Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:27:48.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scorpions from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland, with a revision of the infraorder Mesoscorpionina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Andrew J. Jeram
Andrew J. Jeram
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Ulster Museum, Botanic Gardens, Belfast BT9 5AB, N. Ireland, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scorpions from East Kirkton Quarry are represented by abundant cuticle fragments and rarer articulated specimens. Cuticles isolated from their matrix are exquisitely preserved, permitting this fauna to be described in more detail than other Carboniferous scorpion faunas. Most of the material is attributed to Pulmonoscorpius kirktonensis n. gen. n. sp. Specimens possibly indicating the presence of two additional Pulmonoscorpius species are referred to under open nomenclature. Rare fragments of an aquatic ‘archaeoctonoid’, and an orthostern scorpion, also occur. Most specimens of Pulmonoscorpius are juveniles. The range of taphonomic effects observed in these and larger individuals suggests that, as a consequence of poor preservation, the morphology of some Upper Palaeozoic scorpions has been misinterpreted by previous workers. Within the infraorder Mesoscorpionina two groups are recognised. These are distinguished by the position of the posterior pair of coxae. Pulmonoscorpius n. gen. belongs to group A, in which the posterior coxae abut the sternum. This group includes the known Lower Carboniferous mesoscorpions and ranges from the Upper Devonian to the Upper Carboniferous. All group-A mesoscorpions are reviewed here. In group-B mesoscorpions the posterior pair of coxae apparently abut the genital opercula, but confirmation of this derived character and formal taxonomic recognition of these groupings must await a restudy of the group-B mesoscorpions, which are known from the Upper Carboniferous and Triassic.

Keywords

Scorpionpreservationtaphonomysystematicsfunctional morphologycuticleecologyCarboniferousEast KirktonScotland
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 84 , Issue 3-4: Volcanism and early terrestrial biotas , 1993 , pp. 283 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartram, K. M., Jeram, A. J. & Selden, P. A. 1987. Arthropod cuticles in coal. J GEOL SOC LONDON 144, 313–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauckmann, C. 1988. Hagen-Vorhalle, a new important Namurian Insecta-bearing locality (Upper Carboniferous: FR Germany). ENTOMOL GENERALIS 14, 73–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzijn, H. W. C. 1976. Functional anatomy of the walking-legs of Scorpionida, with remarks on terminology and homologization of leg segments. NETHERL J ZOOL 26, 453–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, R. 1898. A fossil scorpion from Airdrie, with historical note. ANN KILMARNOCK GLENFIELD RAMBLERS 2, 60–1.Google Scholar
Filshie, B. K. & Hadley, N. F. 1979. Fine structure of the cuticle of the desert scorpion, Hadrurus arizonensis. TISSUE CELL 11, 249–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeram, A. J. 1989. Terrestrial arthropod Lagerstätten: the significance of cuticle preservation. ABSTR 28TH INT GEOL CONGR 2, 121.Google Scholar
Jeram, A. J. 1990. Book-lungs in a Lower Carboniferous scorpion. NATURE 343, 360–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1972. Brontoscorpio anglicus: a gigantic Lower Palaeozoic scorpion from central England. J PALAEONTOL 46, 39–42.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1986. A restudy of the fossil Scorpionida of the World. PALAEONTOGR AM 55, 1–287.Google Scholar
Moore, J. I. 1923. A review of the present knowledge of fossil scorpions, with the description of a new species from the Pottsville Formation of Clay County, Indiana. PROC INDIANA ACAD SCI 38, 125–34.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N. 1881. On some new species of fossil scorpions from the Carboniferous rocks of Scotland and the English Borders. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 30, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. 1953. Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Arachnids of Europe. MEM GEOL SOC AM 53, 1–128.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. 1955. Arachnida. In Moore, R. C. (Ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. P. Arthropoda 2, 42–162. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas & Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1911. A monograph of the terrestrial Carboniferous Arachnida of Great Britain. PALAEONTOGR SOC MONOGR 64, 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A. 1990. Ecology. In Polis, G. A. (Ed.) The Biology of Scorpions, 247–93. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I. 1988. Early life on land—the East Kirkton discoveries. EARTH SCI CONSERV 25, 22–8.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I. & Beckett, C. M. 1984. Autecology of Silurian Xiphosurida, Scorpionida, and Phyllocarida. SPEC PAP PALAEONT 32, 27–37.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I., Durant, G. P., Baird, W. J., Chaplin, C., Paton, R. L. & Reekie, R. J. 1994. The East Kirkton Limestone, Viséan, West Lothian, Scotland: introduction and stratigraphy. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 177–188.Google Scholar
Root, T. M. 1990. Neurobiology. In Polis, G. A. (Ed.) The biology of scorpions, 341–413. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. & Jeram, A. J. 1989. Palaeophysiology of terrestrialisation in the Chelicerata. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 80, 303–10.Google Scholar
Shear, W. A. & Kukalová-Peck, J. 1990. The ecology of Palaeozoic terrestrial arthropods: the fossil evidence. CANAD J ZOOL 68, 1807–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahnke, H. L. 1970. Scorpion nomenclature and mensuration. ENTOMOL NEWS 81, 279–316.Google Scholar
Stockwell, S. A. 1989. Revision of the phylogeny and higher classification of the scorpions (Chelicerata). PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkley. Published by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan (available in printed form from publisher).Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1963. Gigantoscorpio willsi, a new scorpion from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland and its associated preying microorganisms. SKR NOR VIDENSK-AKAD MATNATURVIDENSK KL 8, 1–171.Google Scholar
Thorell, T. & Lindström, G. 1885. On a Silurian scorpion from Gotland. K SVENSK VETENSK-AKAD HANDL 21, 1–33.Google Scholar
Vachon, M. 1973. Étude des caractères utilisés pour classer les families et les genres de Scorpions (Arachnides). 1. La trichobothriotaxie en Arachnologie. Sigles trichobothriaux et types de trichobothriotaxie chez les scorpions. BULL MUS NAT HIST NATUR PARIS 3e sér 140, 857–958.Google Scholar
Walossek, D., Li, C.-S. & Brauckmann, C. 1990. A scorpion from the Upper Devonian of Hubei Province, China (Arachnida, Scorpionida). N JB GEOL PALAEONT MH 1990(3), 169–80.Google Scholar
Waterston, C. D. 1985. Chelicerata from the Dinantian of Foulden, Berwickshire, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 76, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, L. J. 1947. A monograph of the British Triassic scorpions. PALAEONTOGR SOC MONOGR 100, 101 pp.Google Scholar
Wills, L. J. 1960. The ventral anatomy of some Carboniferous ‘scorpions’. Part 2. PALAEONTOLOGY 3, 276–332.Google Scholar