Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:29:16.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A second fossil species of the enigmatic rove beetle genus Charhyphus in Eocene Baltic amber, with implications on the morphology of the female genitalia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Phloeocharinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2021

Shûhei YAMAMOTO Open the ORCID record for Shûhei YAMAMOTO [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexey V. SHAVRIN Open the ORCID record for Alexey V. SHAVRIN [Opens in a new window]  and
Kristaps KAIRIŠS Open the ORCID record for Kristaps KAIRIŠS [Opens in a new window]
Shûhei YAMAMOTO*
Affiliation:
The Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Kita 8, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0808, Japan.
Alexey V. SHAVRIN
Affiliation:
Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, Vienibas 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia.
Kristaps KAIRIŠS
Affiliation:
Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, Vienibas 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: s.yamamoto.64@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phloeocharinae is a small and likely non-monophyletic subfamily of rove beetles. The enigmatic genus Charhyphus Sharp, 1887 has long been placed in Phloeocharinae, whereas recent studies have found it to be phylogenetically very distant from the core members of this subfamily, suggesting the possibility that it actually deserves its own separate subfamily status. So far, the sole definitive fossil record for Charhyphus is known based on a single male from Eocene Baltic amber as represented by †Charhyphus balticus Shavrin, 2020. Here, we describe and illustrate another new Charhyphus species, †Charhyphus serratus sp. nov. Yamamoto & Shavrin, from Baltic amber based on a well-preserved female fossil. Considering the general proportions of the body and the head, this new species is most similar to †C. balticus. The new species differs from all known species by the development of strong serration of the lateral edges of the pronotum and features of the shape of the apical margin of the mesoventrite. By using X-ray micro-computed tomography, we succeeded in visualising not only the general habitus but also each individual body part, recovering a previously undocumented sclerite on the female internal genital segments in the genus. Morphological features of extinct and extant species of Charhyphus are briefly discussed. Figures of all extant Charhyphus species and a key for the genus are also provided. Our study is important for considering possible higher palaeodiversity, more common occurrence, and palaeobiogeography of Charhyphus.

Keywords

fossil insectskey to speciesmorphological characternew speciestaxonomyX-ray micro-computed tomography
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 39 - 50
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

8. References

Alekseev, V. I. 2013. The beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Baltic amber: the checklist of described species and preliminary analysis of biodiversity. Zoology and Ecology 23, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alekseev, V. I. 2017. Coleoptera from the middle-upper Eocene European ambers: generic composition, zoogeography and climatic implications. Zootaxa 4290, 401–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alekseev, V. I., Mitchell, J., McKellar, R. C., Barbi, M., Larsson, H. C. E. & Bukejs, A. 2021. The first described turtle beetles from Eocene Baltic amber, with notes on fossil Chelonariidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea). Fossil Record 24, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashe, J. S. 2005. Phylogeny of the tachyporine group subfamilies and ‘basal’ lineages of the Aleocharinae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) based on larval and adult characteristics. Systematic Entomology 30, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashe, J. S. & Newton, A. F Jr.. 1993. Larvae of Trichophya and phylogeny of the tachyporine group of subfamilies (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) with a review, new species and characterization of the Trichophyinae. Systematic Entomology 18, 267–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assing, V. 2015. A new species of Phloeocharis Mannerheim from Spain, with a note on P. brachyptera Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Phloeocharinae). Linzer biologische Beiträge 47, 57–62.Google Scholar
Bernhauer, M. 1923. Synonymische Bemerkungen bezüglich mehrfach beschriebener Staphylinidengattungen und Arten. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung 40, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhauer, M. 1933. Ein neues paläarktisches Piestinen-Genus. Koleopterologische Rundschau 19, 121–22.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R. E. 1952. The generic names of the beetle family Staphylinidae, with an essay on genotypy. United States National Museum Bulletin 200, i–iv, 1–483.Google Scholar
Bogri, A., Solodovnikov, A. & Żyła, D. 2018. Baltic amber impact on historical biogeography and palaeoclimate research: oriental rove beetle Dysanabatium found in the Eocene of Europe (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Paederinae). Papers in Palaeontology 4, 433–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunke, A., Newton, A., Klimaszewski, J., Majka, C. & Marshall, S. 2011. Staphylinidae of eastern Canada and adjacent United States. Key to subfamilies; Staphylininae: tribes and subtribes, and species of Staphylinina. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification 12, 1–110.Google Scholar
Brunke, J. A., Żyła, D., Yamamoto, S. & Solodovnikov, A. 2019. Baltic amber Staphylinini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae): a rove beetle fauna on the eve of our modern climate. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 187, 166–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukejs, A., Alekseev, V. I. & Pollock, D. A. 2019. Waidelotinae, a new subfamily of Pyrochroidae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) from Baltic amber of the Sambian peninsula and the interpretation of Sambian amber stratigraphy, age and location. Zootaxa 4664, 261–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukejs, A., Bezděk, J., Alekseev, V. I., Kairišs, K. & McKellar, R. C. 2020a. Description of the male of fossil Calomicrus eocenicus Bukejs et Bezděk (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Eocene Baltic amber using X-ray microtomography. Fossil Record 23, 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukejs, A., Reid, C. A. M. & Biondi, M. 2020b. Groehnaltica batophiloides, a new genus and species of flea-beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from Baltic amber, described using X-ray microtomography. Zootaxa 4859, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzimanolis, S. & Engel, M. S. 2011. A new species of Diochus from Baltic amber (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Diochini). ZooKeys 138, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzimanolis, S., Newton, A. F., Soriano, C. & Engel, M. S. 2013. Remarkable stasis in a phloeocharine rove beetle from the late cretaceous of New Jersey (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Journal of Paleontology 87, 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coiffait, H. 1957. Les Phloeocharis anophtalmes (subg. Scotodytes Saulcy) (Coleoptera Staphylinidae). Revue Francaise d'Entomologie 24, 232–43.Google Scholar
Coiffait, H. 1974. Staphylinides récoltés en Ussuri (Asie Orientale) par S. M. Khnzorian-Iablokoff. Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie 4, 197–204.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1839. Die käfer der Mark Brandenburg. In Erster Band. Zweite Abtheilung, 385–740. Berlin: Morin.Google Scholar
Fauvel, A. 1878a. Les Staphylinides de l'Amerique du nord. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Normandie 3, 167–269.Google Scholar
Fauvel, A. 1878b. Les Staphylinides de l'Amerique du nord. Notices Entomologiques 7, 1–100.Google Scholar
Gusarov, V. I. 2018. Phylogeny of the family Staphylinidae based on molecular data: a review. In Betz, O., Irmler, U. & Klimaszewski, J. (eds) Biology of rove beetles (Staphylinidae): life history, evolution, ecology and distribution, 7–25. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handlirsch, A. 1907. Die Fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen. Ein Handbuch für Paläontologen und Zoologen 5, 641–800.Google Scholar
Herman, L. H. 1972. A revision of the rove-beetle genus Charhyphus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Phloeocharinae). American Museum Novitates 2496, 1–16.Google Scholar
Herman, L. H. 2001. Catalogue of the Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). 1758 to the end of the second millennium. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 265, i–vi, 1–4218.Google Scholar
Hernando, C. 2003. Phloeocharis (Scotodytes) montnegrensis sp. nov., un nuevo estafílinido endógeo del noreste de la Península Ibérica (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Phloeocharinae). Heteropterus Revista de Entomología 2, 1–5.Google Scholar
Jałoszyński, P., Brunke, A. J., Yamamoto, S. & Takahashi, Y. 2018. Evolution of Mastigitae: Mesozoic and Cenozoic fossils crucial for reclassification of extant tribes (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 184, 623–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jałoszyński, P., Luo, X.-Z., Hammel, J. G., Yamamoto, S. & Beutel, R. G. 2020. The mid-cretaceous †Lepiceratus gen. nov. and the evolution of the relict beetle family Lepiceridae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Myxophaga). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 18, 1127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundrata, R., Bukejs, A., Prosvirov, A. S. & Hoffmannova, J. 2020. X-ray micro-computed tomography reveals a unique morphology in a new click-beetle (Coleoptera, Elateridae) from the Eocene Baltic amber. Scientific Reports 10, 20158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kypke, J. L. & Solodovnikov, A. 2020. Every cloud has a silver lining: X-ray micro-CT reveals Orsunius rove beetle in Rovno amber from a specimen inaccessible to light microscopy. Historical Biology 32, 940–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes. Tome troisième. Familles naturelles et genres, i–xii, 13–468. Paris: F. Dufart.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1863. New species of North American Coleoptera. Part I. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 6, 1–92.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus I. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii. 824 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lü, L., Cai, C.-Y., Zhang, X., Newton, A. F., Thayer, M. K. & Zhou, H. Z. 2020. Linking evolutionary mode to palaeoclimate change reveals rapid radiations of staphylinoid beetles in low-energy conditions. Current Zoology 66, 435–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makranczy, G. 2006. Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the genera in the Carpelimus group (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae). Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 98, 29–120.Google Scholar
McKenna, D. D., Farrell, B. D., Caterino, M. S., Farnum, C. W., Hawks, D. C., Maddison, D. R., Seago, A. E., Short, A. E. Z., Newton, A. F. & Thayer, M. K. 2015. Phylogeny and evolution of Staphyliniformia and Scarabaeiformia: forest litter as a stepping stone for diversification of nonphytophagous beetles. Systematic Entomology 40, 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, I. & Legner, E. F. 1973. The genera of the subfamilies Phloeocharinae and Olisthaerinae of America North of Mexico with description of a new genus and new species from Washington (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). The Canadian Entomologist 105, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, A. F. Jr. 1985. South temperate Staphylinoidea (Coleoptera): their potential for biogeographic analysis of austral disjunctions. In Ball, G. E. (ed.) Taxonomy, phylogeny and zoogeography of beetles and ants. Series Entomologica, 33, 180–220. Dordrecht: W. Junk.Google Scholar
Newton, A. F., Thayer, M. K., Ashe, J. S. & Chandler, D. S. 2000. 22. Staphylinidae Latreille, 1802. In Arnett, R. H. Jr & Thomas, M. C. (eds) American beetles. Volume 1. Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga, Polyphaga: Staphyliniformia, 272–418. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Penney, D. 2016. Sub/fossil resin research in the 21st century: trends and perspectives. PalZ 90, 425–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreau, M., Haelewaters, D. & Tafforeau, P. 2021. A parasitic coevolution since the Miocene revealed by phase-contrast synchrotron X-ray microtomography and the study of natural history collections. Scientific Reports 11, 2672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreau, M. & Tafforeau, P. 2011. Virtual dissection using phase-contrast X-ray synchrotron microtomography: reducing the gap between fossils and extant species. Systematic Entomology 36, 573–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J., Scholz, S. & Maddison, D. R. 2021. Balticeler kerneggeri gen. nov., sp. nov., an enigmatic Baltic amber fossil of the ground beetle subfamily Trechinae (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 68, 207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1900. Adephagous and clavicorn Coleoptera from the Tertiary deposits at Florissant, Colorado with descriptions of a few other forms and a systematic list of the non-Rhynchophorous Tertiary Coleoptera of North America. Monographs of the United States Geological Survey 40, 1–148.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. S. 1887. Staphylinidae. In Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Coleoptera. Volume 1. Part 2, 673–824. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Shavrin, A. V. 2020. New species and records of Paraphloeostiba Steel, 1960 from China and Laos, and descriptions of four new species of related genera (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Omaliini). Zootaxa 4890, 301–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavrin, A. V. & Kairišs, K. 2020. The first fossil Phloeocharinae Erichson, 1839 (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) from the Baltic Eocene amber. Palaeoentomology 3, 375–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavrin, A. V. & Kairišs, K. 2021. A new species of Eusphalerum Kraatz, 1857 from the Eocene Baltic amber (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Omaliinae). Zootaxa 4966, 369–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavrin, A. V. & Yamamoto, S. 2019. Unexpected palaeodiversity of omaliine rove beetles in Eocene Baltic amber (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae). ZooKeys 863, 35–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavrin, A. V. & Yamamoto, S. 2020. A remarkable new species of the rove beetle genus Anthobium Leach, 1819 from Eocene Baltic amber (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Omaliinae). ZooKeys 973, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, A. & Campbell, J. M. 1980. A new genus and two new Phloeocharinae species from the Pacific coast of North America (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). The Canadian Entomologist 112, 1061–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, W. O. 1950. A new genus and four new species of Phloeocharinae (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) from the Australian region. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 75, 334–44.Google Scholar
Steel, W. O. 1953. Anew genus and species of Phloeocharinae (Col., Staphylinidae) from New Zealand. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 89, 162–64.Google Scholar
Thayer, M. K. 2016. Staphylinidae Latreille, 1802. In Beutel, R. G. & Leschen, R. A. B. (eds) Handbook of zoology; Arthropoda: Insecta, Coleoptera, beetles. Morphology and systematics (Archostemata, Adephaga, Myxophaga, Polyphaga Partim). Volume 1, 394–442. Berlin/Heidelberg: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
von Mannerheim, C. G. 1830. Précis d'un nouvel arrangement de la famille des brachélytres de l'ordre des insectes coléoptères. St. Petersbourg, Russia. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Webster, R. P., Sweeney, J. D. & DeMerchant, I. 2012. New Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) records with new collection data from New Brunswick, Canada: Omaliinae, Micropeplinae, Phloeocharinae, Olisthaerinae, and Habrocerinae. ZooKeys 186, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, S. 2021. Tachyporinae revisited: phylogeny, evolution, and higher classification based on morphology, with recognition of a new rove beetle subfamily (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Biology 10, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, S. & Maruyama, M. 2018. Phylogeny of the rove beetle tribe Gymnusini sensu n. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae): implications for the early branching events of the subfamily. Systematic Entomology 43, 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanetti, A., Perreau, M. & Solodovnikov, A. 2016. Two new fossil species of Omaliinae from Baltic amber (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and their significance for understanding the Eocene-Oligocene climate. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 74, 53–64.Google Scholar