Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T19:55:07.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EQUALITY VERSUS PRIORITY: A USEFUL DISTINCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2015

John Broome
John Broome*
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford OX1 4JF, UK. Email: john.broome@philosophy.ox.ac.uk. URL: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfop0060/.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Both egalitarianism and prioritarianism give value to equality. Prioritarianism has an additively separable value function whereas egalitarianism does not. I show that in some cases prioritarianism and egalitarianism necessarily have different implications: I describe two alternatives G and H such that egalitarianism necessarily implies G is better than H whereas prioritarianism necessarily implies G and H are equally good. I also raise a doubt about the intelligibility of prioritarianism.

Keywords

EgalitarianismPrioritarianismUtilitarianismFairness
Type
Symposium on Equality versus Priority
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , July 2015 , pp. 219 - 228
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allais, M. 1979. The foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School. In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, ed. Allais, M. and Hagen, O., 27–145. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E.. 1980. Lectures on Public Economics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Broome, J. 1991. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 2015. Equality versus priority: how relevant is the distinction?Economics and Philosophy 31: 203–217.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M. 2015. Equality versus priority: a misleading distinction. Economics and Philosophy 31: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. 2002. Prioritarianism for prospects. Utilitas 14: 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar