Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:02:56.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Maher and Kashima

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Isaac Levi
Isaac Levi
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 101 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Levi, I. 1989. “Reply to Maher.” Economics and Philosophy 5:79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, P. 1989. “Levi on the Allais and Ellsberg Problems.” Economics and Philosophy 5:69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, P., and Kashima, Y.. 1991. “On the Descriptive Adequacy of Levi's Decision Theory.” Economics and Philosophy 7:93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenfeld, T. 1988. “Decision Theory without ‘Independence’ or without ‘Ordering’: What Is the Difference?” Economics and Philosophy 4:267–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar