Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T17:49:12.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Better Understanding of the Positive/Normative Distinction in Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Samuel C. Weston
Samuel C. Weston
Affiliation:
University of Dallas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This essay argues in favor of retaining the positive/normative distinction in economics, in spite of developments in methodology and epistemology that have cast doubt on the possibility of a “value-free” economics. The central claim is that it is worthwhile to distinguish between positive economic analysis and normative judgments, even if economics is viewed as being permeated with ethical values. This argument is presented without trying either to demonstrate that there is (or is not) a profound epistemological difference between science and ethics or to show that positive science can (or cannot) afford us access to objective reality.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balabkins, Nicholas W. 1987. “Value and Value-Judgements in Economics: Rugina's Contribution.” International Journal of Social Economics 14:50–62.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1983. “The Cambridge Debate on the Theory of Capital and Distribution.” In The Crisis in Economic Theories, edited by Caravale, G., pp.102–30. Milan: Franco Angeli Editore.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth. 1970. Economics as a Science. New York:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1991. “Clarifying Popper.” journal of Economic Literature 29:l–33.Google Scholar
Heyne, Paul. 1978. “Economics and Ethics: The Problem of Dialogue.” In Belief and Ethics, edited by Widick, Schroeder and Gibson, Winter. Chicago:Center for the Scientific Study of Religion.Google Scholar
Hume, David.[1777] 1960. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. LaSalle, Illinois:The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Neville.[1917] 1973. The Scope and Method of Political Economy, 4th ed. New York:Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz. 1965. “Why Economists Disagree.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109:1–7.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz. 1969. “Positive and Normative Economics.” In Economic Means and Social Ends, edited by Robert, Heilbroner, pp.99–129. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. [1920] 1982. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. Philadelphia:Porcupine Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Richard B. 1981. “The Necessary Normative Context of Positive Economics.” journal of Economic Issues 15:703–19.Google Scholar
Menger, Carl. 1871. Principles of Economics, trans. James, Dingwell and Bert, F.Hoselitz. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. [1954] 1984. “Implicit Values in Economics.” In The Philosophy of Economics, edited by Hausman, Daniel M., pp.250–59. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. [1954] 1958. “International Integration.” In Value in Social Theory: A Selection of Essays on Methodology by Gunnar Myrdal, edited by Paul, Streeten, pp. 1–8. New York:Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
O'Brien, John Conway.1981. “The Economist's Quandary:Ethical Values.” International Journal of Social Economics 8:26–46.Google Scholar
Roy, Subroto. 1992. Philosophy of Economics. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J.1980. “Economics as a Science and Its Relation to Policy: The Example of Free Trade.” journal of Economic Issues 16:163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. 1988. “An Essay on the Nature and Significance of the Normative Nature of Economics.” journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 10:347–54.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. [1836] 1965. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. New York:Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1949. “The Meaning of 'Ethical Neutrality' in Sociology and Economics.” In Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited by Edward A, Shils and Harry A, Finch, pp. 1–47. Glencoe, Illinois:The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard. [1832] 1966. Introductory Lectures on Political Economy, 2nd ed. New York:Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Wilber, Charles K. and Roland, Hoksbergen. 1984. “Current Thinking on the Role of Value Judgments in Economic Science: A Survey.” In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, volume 2, edited by Samuels, Warren J, pp.179–94. Greenwich, Connecticut:JAI Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar