We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Applequist, W. L. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants: 69. Taxon66(2): 500–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J. S. (2001). A revision of Euonymus (Celastraceae). Thaiszia11(1/2): 1–264.Google Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Prud'homme van Reine, W. F., Smith, G. F., Wiersema, J. H. & Turland, N. J.(eds and comps) (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code), Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile 154. Oberreifenberg: Koeltz Botanical Books.Google Scholar
Ramamurthy, K. (2000). Celastraceae. In: Singh, N. P., Vohra, J. N., Hajra, P. K. & Singh, D. K. (eds) Flora of India, vol. 5, pp. 75–137. Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India.Google Scholar
Turner, I. M. (2015). (30–41) Requests for binding decisions on the descriptive statements associated with 12 species in Conrad Loddiges and Sons’ The Botanical Cabinet. Taxon64(6): 1333–1335.Google Scholar
Turner, I. M. (2016). Rather for the nomenclaturist than for the scientific botanist: the Botanical Cabinet of Conrad Loddiges & Sons. Taxon65(5): 1107–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallich, N. (1829 [as 1828]–1849). A Numerical List of Dried Specimens of Plants in the East India Company's Museum, Collected Under the Superintendence of Dr. Wallich of the Company's Botanic Garden at Calcutta. London.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. L. (2017). Report of the General Committee: 18. Taxon66(3): 742–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar