Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:36:01.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variable assimilation of English word-final /n/: electropalatographic evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2020

ALEXEI KOCHETOV ,
LAURA COLANTONI  and
JEFFREY STEELE
ALEXEI KOCHETOV
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, room 4076, Toronto, OntarioM5S 3G3, Canadaal.kochetov@utoronto.ca
LAURA COLANTONI
Affiliation:
Department of Spanish & Portuguese, University of Toronto, Northrop Frye Hall 304, 73 Queen's Park Cr, Toronto, OntarioM5S 1K7, Canadalaura.colatoni@utoronto.ca
JEFFREY STEELE
Affiliation:
University of Toronto at Mississauga, Department of Language Studies, 3359 Mississauga Road, Maanjiwe nendamowinan, 4th floor, Mississauga, OntarioL5L 1C6, Canadajeffrey.steele@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phonetic realization of the English word-final alveolar nasal /n/ is known to be highly variable. Previous articulatory work has reported both gradient and categorical nasal place assimilation including considerable between-speaker differences. This work, however, has largely focused on a small subset of place contexts (namely, preceding velar /k, ɡ/) in a limited number of English varieties. The present article uses electropalatography to study the articulatory realization of /n/ in a wider range of phonetic contexts and read texts as produced by three speakers of Canadian English. The results reveal considerable inter- and intra-speaker differences in the rates of assimilation. Consistent with previous work, we observed a high degree of variation, both gradient and categorical, before velars. Substantial rates of assimilation were also observed before labials, where the process is unexpected from the point of view of gestural phonology but predicted by traditional phonological analyses. The variation in the place and stricture of /n/ before coronals was more limited and typically gradient. Finally, some differences were observed across the text conditions, with more assimilation occurring in carrier sentences than in the read passage and, to a more limited extent, in function than in content words.

Keywords

phoneticsnasal assimilationCanadian Englishelectropalatography
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 687 - 718
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We wish to acknowledge helpful comments and suggestions provided by two anonymous reviewers and the editor Patrick Honeybone, the assistance of our study participants, funding from the University of Toronto Advancing Teaching and Learning in Arts and Science (ATLAS) program, and the Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council of Canada (Insight Grant #435-2015-2013 to Alexei Kochetov), as well as the assistance of Katherine Sung and Na-Young Ryu with data annotation.

References

Baković, Eric. 2007. Local assimilation and constraint interaction. In Lacy, Paul de (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 335–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3), 255–78. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, Martin C. 1985. A palatographic study of connected speech processes. Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Barry, Martin C. 1991. Temporal modelling of gestures in articulatory assimilation. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, vol. 4, 14–17. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steven. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1, no. 7, 1–23.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni Jean. 1986. Topics in the lexical phonology of English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6, 201–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1995. Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In Bell-Berti, Fredericka & Raphael, Lawrence J. (eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues, 19–33. Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 1992. Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: A gestural model. Phonetica 49, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celata, Chiara, Calamai, Silvia, Ricci, Irene & Bertini, Chiara. 2013. Nasal place assimilation between phonetics and phonology: An EPG study of Italian nasal to velar clusters. Journal of Phonetics 41, 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Keating, Patricia. 2009. Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics 37(4), 466–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2, 223–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Kochetov, Alexei. 2012. Nasal variability and speech style: An EPG study of coda nasals in two Spanish dialects. Italian Journal of Linguistics 24, 11–42.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 8th edn. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2018. The 14 Billion Word iWeb Corpus. Available online at https://corpus.byu.edu/iWeb/Google Scholar
De Jong, Kenneth, Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan. 1993. The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Language and Speech 36(2–3), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Lucy & Hardcastle, William J.. 2002. Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics 30, 373–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnetani, Edda & Busà, Maria Grazia. 1994. Italian clusters in continuous speech. Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, vol. 1, 359–62.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1999. Palatography. In Hardcastle, William & Hewlett, Nigel (eds.), Coarticulation: Data, theory and techniques, 229–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Jacobs, Haike. 2017. Understanding phonology. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. 1995. Assimilation of alveolar stops and nasals in connected speech. In Windsor Lewis, J. (ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics in honour of Professor J. D. O'Connor, 49–67. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1992. Commentary on F. Nolan, ‘The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation’. In Docherty, Gerry J. & Robert Ladd, D. (eds.). Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 280–6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honorof, Douglas. 1999. Articulatory gestures and Spanish nasal assimilation. PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Marion & Hoole, Philip. 2011. Articulatory factors influencing regressive place assimilation across word boundaries in German. Journal of Phonetics 39, 413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1962. An outline of English phonetics, 9th edn. Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 1995. Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Colantoni, Laura. 2011. Spanish nasal assimilation revisited: A cross-dialect electropalatographic study. Laboratory Phonology 2, 487–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei, Colantoni, Laura & Steele, Jeffrey. 2017. A comparison of Articulate and Reading EPG palates: Capturing place/manner contrasts. Paper presented at the 11th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP 2017), 16–19 October 2017, Tianjin, China.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Pouplier, Marianne. 2008. Phonetic variability and grammatical knowledge: An articulatory study of Korean place assimilation. Phonology 25, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivokapić, Jelena & Byrd, Dani. 2012. Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study. Journal of Phonetics 40(3), 430–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B.. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohaghegh, Mercedeh. 2016. Connected speech processes and lexical access in real-time comprehension. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis. 1992. The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation. In Robert Ladd, D. & Docherty, Gerry J. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II, 261–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis & Kerswill, Paul E.. 1990. The description of connected speech processes. In Ramsaran, Susan (ed.), Studies in the pronunciation of English: A commemorative volume in honour of A. C. Gimson, 295–316. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Stricture in feature geometry. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Perkell, Joseph S., Matthies, Melanie L., Tiede, Mark, Lane, Harlan, Zandipour, Majid, Marrone, Nicole, Stockmann, Ellen & Guenther, Frank H.. 2004. The distinctness of speakers’ /s/ /ʃ/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 1259–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitt, Mark A., Dilley, Laura, Johnson, Keith, Kiesling, Scott, Raymond, William, Hume, Elizabeth & Fosler-Lussier, Eric. 2007. Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech, 2nd release. Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org [computer program]Google Scholar
Ramsammy, Michael. 2011. The realization of coda nasals in Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Mira, Meritxell. 2015. Place and manner assimilation in Catalan consonant clusters. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 45, 115–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, Margaret E., Baghai-Ravary, Ladan, Temple, Ros & Coleman, John S.. 2013. Assimilation of word-final nasals to following word-initial place of articulation in United Kingdom English. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013 19(1), 060257.Google Scholar
Rogers, Henry. 2000. The sounds of language: An introduction to phonetics. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Shockey, Linda. 1991. Electropalatography of conversational speech. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 3, 10–13. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Shosted, Ryan K. 2011. An articulatory-aerodynamic approach to stop excrescence. Journal of Phonetics 39, 660–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Jeffrey, Colantoni, Laura & Kochetov, Alexei. 2018. Gradient assimilation in French cross-word /n/+velar stop sequences. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. Published online: 20 March 2018, 1–22.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Lisa S. & Harrington, Jonathan. 2002. Assimilation of place of articulation: Evidence from English and Japanese. Proceedings of the 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 592–7.Google Scholar
Wrench, Alan. 2007. Advances in EPG palate design. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9(1) 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrench, Alan, Gibbon, Fiona, McNeill, Alison M. & Wood, Sara. 2002. An EPG therapy protocol for remediation and assessment of articulation disorders. In Hansen, John H. L. & Pellom, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 965–8. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
Wright, Susan & Kerswill, Paul. 1989. Electropalatography in the analysis of connected speech processes. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 3(1). 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth. 1995. An acoustic and electropalatographic study of lexical and postlexical palatalization in American English. In Connell, Bruce & Arvanti, Amalia (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology IV, 282–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar