Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:35:00.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William A. Kretzschmar Jr, Language and complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp xiv. + 230. ISBN 9781107100459.

Review products

William A. Kretzschmar Jr, Language and complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp xiv. + 230. ISBN 9781107100459.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2017

Diane Larsen-Freeman  and
Philip Herdina
Diane Larsen-Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, School of Education, 610 E. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259, USAdianelf@umich.edu
Philip Herdina
Affiliation:
University of Innsbruck, Department of English, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaPhilip.Herdina@uibk.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 539 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane (eds.). 2009. Language as a complex adaptive system. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2003. The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister's pox: Mending the gap between science and the humanities. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine (ed.). 1991. Chaos and order: Complex dynamics in literature and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herdina, Philip. 2017. Entrenchment, embeddedness, and entanglement: A dynamic complexity view. In Schmid, Hans-Jörg (ed.), Entrenchment, memory and automaticity: The psychology of linguistic knowledge and language learning, 387−407. Boston: American Psychological Association and De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139−57.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 2015. An emergentist approach to grammar. In MacWhinney, Brian & O'Grady, William (eds.), The handbook of language emergence, 314−27. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. 2009. The linguistics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2003. Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle/Cengage.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2011. Review of William A. Kretzschmar's The linguistics of speech. English World-Wide 32(2), 237−42.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2017a. Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Ortega, Lourdes & Han, ZhaoHong (eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2017b. The fractal shape of language. Paper delivered at AILA 2017 (International Association of Applied Linguistics), Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1998. Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar