Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:21:23.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grammatical overkill in Japan?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Abstract

KAZUO KATO replies to Torkil Christensen, whose article ‘Grammatical overkill?’ appeared in ET20 (Oct 89).

Type
Angles of Vision
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfonso, A. (1974) Japanese Language Patterns. Tokyo: Sophia University L.L. Center of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Burnaby, B., and Sun, Y. (1989) ‘Chinese Teachers' Views of Western Language Teaching: Context Informs Paradigms’, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 219238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T. (1989) ‘Grammatical Overkill?English Today, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp 3841.Google Scholar
Kharma, N. N., and Hajjaj, A. H. (1989) ‘Use of Mother Tongue in the ESL Classroom’, IRAL, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 223235.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, K. (1988) ‘Language Habits of the Japanese’, English Today, Vol. 4, No. 3 pp 1925.Google Scholar
Saporta, S. (1966) ‘Applied Linguistics and Generative Grammar’, in Valdman, A. (ed.), Trends in Language Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp 8192.Google Scholar