Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:46:53.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Red, White, and “Big Blue”: IBM and the Business-Government Interface in the United States, 1956–2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

David Hart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes the evolution of IBM's effort to manage its relationships with the U.S. government from the time that Thomas Watson, Jr. became CEO. While the Watson family controlled the firm, the family members served as the main bridges between IBM and the government. This personalized approach began to give way in the 1960s, as the intensity and scope of pressure from the firm's political environment grew beyond the capability of any individual to handle. During the 1970s and 1980s, IBM constructed a managerial hierarchy, with a newly opened Washington office at its center, which could gather more detailed intelligence and execute more sophisticated political strategies. The firm's crisis in the early 1990s provoked a second major restructuring of the interface, as IBM became more of a Washington “special interest.” Yet, some traces of the Watson imprint remained, even in the Gerstner era. Tracing IBM's evolution helps us to understand better the broader interactions between U.S. firms and their environments in this period. These interactions entailed adaptation by firms to environmental change but also efforts by firms to exert control over external forces, including public policy.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Amatori, Franco, and Geoffrey, Jones eds. Business History Around the World. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L. Basic Interests. Princeton, N.J., 1998.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Rogene A. Business Environment and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1995.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kelly, Martin, and Aspray, William Computer: History of the Information Machine. New York, 1996.Google Scholar
Carroll, Paul. Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM. New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Cherington, Paul W., and Gillen, Ralph L. The Business Representative in Washington. Washington, D.C., 1962.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. The People’s Lobby. Chicago, 1997.Google Scholar
Collins, Robert M. The Business Response to Keynes, 1929–1964. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, Mass., 1992.Google Scholar
DeLamarter, Richard Thomas. Big Blue: IBM’s Use and Abuse of Power. New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha, and Quirk, Paul J. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, D.C., 1985.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles H., and Morris, Charles R. Computer Wars: How the West Can Win in a Post-IBM World. New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Fisher, Franklin M., McGowan, John J. and Greenwood, Joan E. Folded, Spindled, and Mutilated: Economic Analysis and U.S. vs. IBM. Cambridge, Mass., 1983.Google Scholar
Fisher, Franklin M., McKie, James W. and Mancke, Richard B. IBM and the U.S. Data Processing Industry. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Flamm, Kenneth. Mismanaged Trade?: Strategic Policy and the Semiconductor Industry. Washington, D.C., 1996.Google Scholar
Garr, Doug. IBM Redux: Lou Gerstner and the Business Turnaround of the Decade. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Graham, Otis L. Losing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate. Cambridge, Mass., 1992.Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth, and Sicilia, David eds. Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture. New York, 2004.Google Scholar
Lusterman, Seymour. Managing Federal Relations. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Marchand, Roland. Creatingthe Corporate Soul. Berkeley, Calif., 1998.Google Scholar
McGrath, Phyllis S. Redefining Corporate-Federal Relations. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Murmann, Johann Peter. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic ofCollective Action. Cambridge, Mass., 1965.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time. Princeton, N.J., 2004.Google Scholar
Prestowitz, Clyde V. Jr. Trading Places: How We Allowed Japan to Take the Lead. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Schulman, Bruce J. The Seventies: The Great Shift in American Culture, Society, and Politics. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Sobel, Robert. IBM: Colossus in Transition. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Staudenmaier, John M. Technology’s Storytellers. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Stone, Alan. Wrong Number: The Break-Up of AT&T. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Tedlow, Richard S. The Watson Dynasty. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter, and Galambos, Louis. The Fall ofthe Bell System: A Study in Prices and Politics. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Watson, Jr., Thomas, J., and Peter, Petre. Father, Son, and Company. New York, 1990.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Baron, David P. “The Nonmarket Strategy System.” Sloan Management Review 37 (Fall 1995): 73–85.Google Scholar
Englander, Ernie, and Kaufman, Allen “The End of Managerial Ideology: From Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Indifference.” Enterprise & Society 5 (Sept. 2004): 404–450.Google Scholar
Flamm, Kenneth. “Technological Advances and Costs: Computers vs. Communications.” In Changing the Rules, eds. Kenneth, Flamm and Crandall, Robert W. Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 13–61.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis. “Identity and the Boundaries of Business History.” In Business HistoryAround the World, eds. Franco, Amatori and Geoffrey, Jones. New York, 2003, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (Nov. 1985): 481–510.Google Scholar
Grenzke, Janet M. “PACs and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency Is Complex.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (Jan. 1989): 1–24.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard A. “Boundary Spanners, Legitimacy, and Corporate Communications.” In Handbook ofAdministrative Communication, eds. James, Garnett and Kouzmin, Alex. New York, 1997, pp. 309–27.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. “Trade Politics and the Semiconductor Industry.” In The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, ed. Krueger, Anne O. Chicago, 1996, pp. 11–72.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. “The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the New Deal.” American Historical Review 110 (Oct. 2005): 1052–80.Google Scholar
Kipping, Matthias. “Business–Government Relations: Beyond Performance Issues.” In Business History Around the World, eds. Franco, Amatori and Jones, Geoffrey New York, 2003, pp. 372–93.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi, Daniel, Raff, and Temin, Peter “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108 (April 2003): 404–33.Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth. “What Have Lawyers Done for American Business? The Case of Baker and Botts of Houston.” Business History Review 64 (Autumn 1990): 489–526.Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth, and Sicilia, David “Introduction: Crossing Corporate Boundaries.” In Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture, eds. Kenneth, Lipartito and Sicilia, David. New York, 2004, pp. 1 –26.Google Scholar
Marcus, Alfred A., and Irion, Mark S. “The Continued Viability of the Corporate Public Affairs Function.” In Business Strategy and Public Policy, eds. Marcus, Alfred A., Kaufman, Allen M. and Beam, David R. New York, 1987, pp. 267–81.Google Scholar
Sicilia, David. “Cochran’s Legacy: A Cultural Path Not Taken.” Business and Economic History 24 (Fall 1995): 27–40.Google Scholar
Stebenne, David L. “Thomas J. Watson and the Business-Government Relationship, 1933–1956.” Enterprise & Society 6 (March 2005): 45–75.Google Scholar
Usselman, Steven W. “Fostering a Capacity for Compromise: Business, Government, and the Stages of Innovation in American Computing.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 18 (Summer 1996): 30–39.Google Scholar
Wells, Wyatt. “Counterpoint to Reform: Gilbert H. Montague and the Business of Regulation.” Business History Review 78 (Autumn): 423–50.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38 (Sept. 2000): 595–613.Google Scholar
Yoffie, David B. “How an Industry Builds Political Advantage.” Harvard Business Review 66 (May–June 1988): 82–89.Google Scholar

Newspapers and Periodicals

Babcock, Charles R. “Grass-Roots Lobbying Credited with Saving China’s Trade Status.” Washington Post, 27 April, 1997, p. A11.Google Scholar
Brousel, David R. “Coming of Age; a Host of Challenges, Both New and Old, Face Adapso as it Marks its 25th Year.” Datamation, 15Oct., 1986, p. 66.Google Scholar
Brown, Merrill. “Computer-Satellite Alliance Fomenting a Revolution.” Washington Post, 6 July 1980, p. 1.Google Scholar
Chace, Susan. “AT&T and IBM Tread on Each Other’s Toes as Courses Converge.” Wall Street Journal, 4 Sept. 1981, p. 1.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard E. “The Not So Secret CCIA.” National Journal, 25 June, 1977, p. 1005.Google Scholar
Eilperin, Juliet. “High-Tech Lobbying: Microsoft Steps Up Effort.” Roll Call, 27 Oct., 1997.Google Scholar
“Federal Computer Census Shows IBM Position Down.” Datamation, July 1966, p. 109.Google Scholar
Franklin, Ben. “Election Contributions Pose Awkward Queries for Nixon.” New York Times, 7 Jan. 1973, p. 22.Google Scholar
Godwin, Nancy. “NY Assemblyman to Revive VDT Regulation Measure.” Travel Weekly, 20 Dec. 1984, p. 2.Google Scholar
Heilemann, John. “The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth: The Untold Story of the Microsoft Case.” Wired, Nov. 2000, pp. 260–311.Google Scholar
“IBM’s Business Abroad: How It Helps the U.S.” Think, March 1973, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
“IBM’s Canada Unit Halts Its Custom of Political Gifts.” Wall Street Journal, 4 Aug. 1975, p. 2.Google Scholar
Loftus, Joseph A. “House Picks a Lawyer Here to Fight Powell Suit.” New York Times, 15 March, 1967, p. 40.Google Scholar
Lublin, Joann S. “Competition Heats Up in Domestic Satellites as Technology Gains.” Wall Street Journal, 8 Sept., 1978, p. 1.Google Scholar
Marcom, John Jr., “IBM: Behind the Monolith - Tomorrow: $200 Billion by 1995? Maybe But Obstacles Loom.” Wall Street Journal, 7 April, 1986.Google Scholar
Marcom, John Jr. “The Unspoken Truce: IBM, Chastened by Some Serious Blunders Sidesteps Head-On Competition With AT&T.” Wall Street Journal, 24 Feb. 1986.Google Scholar
Markoff, John. “Growing Incompatibility Issue: Computers and User Privacy.” New York Times, 3 March, 1999, p. A1.Google Scholar
“Mind Behind the Microsoft Miracle.” Washington Post, 3 Dec. 1995, H1.Google Scholar
Mintz, John. “Some Firms Urging Workers to Oppose Health Care Bills.” Washington Post, 20 Aug. 1994, p. A6.Google Scholar
Moran, Tom, and LaPlante, Alicia “DRAM Chip Shortage Threatens Price Hikes, Shipping Delays.” Info World, 30 May, 1988.Google Scholar
Morris, Betsy. “Big Blue.” Fortune, 14 April, 1997, pp. 68–81.Google Scholar
Newman, Barry. “Churches Mount First Joint Campaign Against U.S. Firms in Southern Africa.” Wall Street Journal, 15 Feb., 1972, p. 11.Google Scholar
Richards, Evelyn. “Red, White and Big Blue; IBM is Leading the Charge of High-Tech Nationalism.” San Jose Mercury News, 1 July, 1989, p. 1C.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Glenn. “The Health Care Debate: Behind the Scenes.” New York Times, 19 Aug., 1994, p. A1.Google Scholar
Robertson, Jack. “Computer Caucus Seeks New Members.” Electronic News, 12 June, 1989.Google Scholar
Robertson, Jack. “Trade Talks Break Off on Market Access Gauge.” Electronics News, 29 April, 1991, p. 1.Google Scholar
Rosen, Dan. “Flying High With That Bird in the Sky.” Think, May/June, 1981, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
Schrage, Michael. “Semiconductor Wars: Firms Split on Dealing with Japan.” Washington Post, 24 Dec., 1985, p. D6.Google Scholar
“Titans Arm Themselves for a Wrestling Match.” San Jose Mercury-News, 7 July, 1985, p. 1F.Google Scholar
Verity, John W., and Schatz, Willie “Fast Break in Armonk.” Datamation, 1 Jan. 1985, p. 70.Google Scholar
Zengerle, Patricia. “DRAM Chip Famine Taking Its Toll.” MIS Week, 21 March, 1988, p. 1.Google Scholar

Government Documents

U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Operations. Automatic Data Processing Equipment. 1965. 89th Cong., 1st sess. Report no. 802.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate Commerce Committee. Domestic Telecommunications Common Carrier Policies, Part 1. 1977. 95th Cong., 1st sess. CIS-NO: 78–S261–10.Google Scholar

Unpublished Works and Online Sources

Davila, Tony, Georgia, Levenson, and Nanda, Ashish “IBM and Siemens: Revitalizing the Rolm Division - A.” HBS Case Services, 9–397–058, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.Google Scholar
Loomis, Burdett, and Struemph, Micheal “Growing Larger, GoingAbroad, Getting Acquired: D.C. Lobbying as an Industry and as a Cash Flow Source.” Paper presented to the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, 8–11 Jan. 2004.Google Scholar
McKittrick, Charles E. “Governmental Programs at IBM.” HBS Case Services, 8–389–109, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass., July 1988.Google Scholar
Usselman, Steven W. Public Policies, Private Platforms: Antitrust and American Computing.“ Paper presented at the Washington Area Economic History Seminar, 27 Feb. 2004.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics, “Influence, Inc.” available at http://www.opensecretsorg/lobbyists/index.htm.Google Scholar

Oral Histories

Attardo, Michael, interview with author, 27 May 1999.Google Scholar
Bloch, Erich, interview with author, 24 May 1999.Google Scholar
Branscomb, Lewis M., interview with author, 1 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Caine, Christopher, interview with author, 9 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Dam, Kenneth, interview with author, 14 May 1999.Google Scholar
Gelman, Norman, interview with author, 11 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Hackman, Timothy B., interview with author, 10 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Holbein, Bruce, interview with author, 21 April 1999.Google Scholar
Kane, Sanford, interview with author, 28 Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
Kay, Kenneth R., interview with author, 9 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, Bob, interview with author, 21 May 1999.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Richard O., interview with author, 9 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
McGurk, Dan, interview with author, 21 May 1999.Google Scholar
McKittrick, Charles E. Jr., interview with author, 10 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Newmyer, James, interview with author, 12 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Opel, John, interview with author, 13 Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
Pearson, Harriet P., interview with author, 9 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Perry, Edmund F., interview with author, 10 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Phelps, Marshall C. Jr., interview with author, 2 June 1999.Google Scholar
Simon, Les, interview with author, 14 May 1999.Google Scholar
Scalise, George M., interview with author, 30 Nov. 1999.Google Scholar
Sheehy, Timothy J., interview with author, 10 Feb. 1999.Google Scholar
Tasker, Joe, interview with author, 1 Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
Verveer, Philip, interview with author, 25 May 1999.Google Scholar
Wade, Gerry, interview with author, 22 Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
Windham, Patrick, to Hart, David M. personal communication, 27 Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
Wolff, Alan W., interview with author, 25 May 1999.Google Scholar
Worth, Douglas, interview with author, 4 June 1999.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

CEO speech files, IBM Archives, Armonk, N.Y.Google Scholar
Clark, Ramsey, oral history interview IV, conducted by Harri, BakerHarr, 16 April, 1969,Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon B. Presidential Library, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Control Data Corporation Archives, Charles Babbage Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn., Series 4, Box 5, Folder 21.Google Scholar
Frank Cary Papers, IBM Archives, Armonk, N.Y.Google Scholar
IBM Annual Meeting transcripts, IBM Archives, Armonk, N.Y.Google Scholar