Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:29:12.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental standard and employment: impact of productivity effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2011

Anindita Sen  and
Rajat Acharyya
Anindita Sen
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Golapbag, University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713104, West Bengal, India. Email: tinnisen@yahoo.com
Rajat Acharyya
Affiliation:
Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. Email: rajat.acharyya@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of environmental standards on aggregate employment in the presence of a productivity effect in a multi-sector general equilibrium framework of an open economy. The productivity effect is generated among the skilled and unskilled workers as an improvement in the environmental quality improves their health, leading to an increase in their productivity. Though the productivity effect initially lowers labour demand as labour requirement per unit of production falls, a standard may raise employment depending on the parametric configurations. In this paper, we identify the role of this productivity effect on the change in employment and show that it may actually improve the chances of an employment expansion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 207 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arora, S. and Gangopadhyay, S. (1995), ‘Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation 28: 289–309.Google Scholar
Bansal, S. and Gangopadhyay, S. (2003), ‘Tax/subsidy policy in the presence of environmentally aware consumers’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 333–355.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. and Mitra, N. (2005), ‘Economic and environmental impacts of pollution content regulation on small-industries: a case study’, Ecological Economics 54(1): 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, C.-C., Kerkvliet, J.R., and Yu, E.S.H. (2000), ‘Environmental preservation, sectoral unemployment, and trade in resources’, Review of Development Economics 4(1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daitoh, I. (2003), ‘Environmental protection and urban unemployment: policy reform in a polluted dualistic economy’, Review of Development Economics 7(3): 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, K., Haley, D., and Kozak, R. (1999), ‘Will consumers pay more for certified wood products?’, Journal of Forestry 97(2): 18–22.Google Scholar
Gabszewicz, J.J. and Thisse, J.-F. (1979), ‘Price competition, quality and income disparities’, Journal of Economic Theory 20: 340–359.Google Scholar
Irland, L.C. (1993), ‘Wood producers face green marketing era’, Wood Technology 120(2): 34–36.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Singh, H. (1994), ‘Eco labelling: policy considerations’, Kyklos 47(1): 53–65.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, R.D., Pizer, W.A., and Shih, J.-S. (2002), ‘Jobs versus the environment: an industry-level perspective’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43: 412–436.Google Scholar
Mussa, M. and Rosen, S. (1978), ‘Monopoly and product quality’, Journal of Economic Theory 18: 301–317.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. (1974), ‘Advertising as information’, Journal of Political Economy (July/August): 729–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimon, W. and Beghin, J. (1999), ‘Ecolabels and international trade in the textile and apparel market’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(5): 1078–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. and Acharyya, R. (2002), ‘Pollution content tariff, environmental quality and welfare’, in Khasnobis, R. (ed.), Issues in Sustainable Development, Calcutta: Department of Business Management, University of Calcutta, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
Sen, A. and Acharyya, R. (2007), ‘Environmental standards and employment: does a trade-off exist?’, Artha Beekshan 15(4): 62–70.Google Scholar
Shaked, A. and Sutton, J. (1982), ‘Relaxing price competition through product differentiation’, Review of Economic Studies XLIX: 1–13.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. (1989), The Theory of Industrial Organisation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Upton, C. and Bass, S. (1996), The Forest Certification Handbook, Delray Beach, FL: St Lucie Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, T. (2005), ‘Environmental policy and the equilibrium rate of unemployment’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(1): 132–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.C. III (2002), ‘Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar