Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:28:48.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal forest management for timber value and carbon sequestration benefits in tropical planted forests: a case study of household foresters in Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2014

Nhung Nghiem
Nhung Nghiem*
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Manawatu, New Zealand; and Department of Public Health, University of Otago, P.O. Box 7343, Wellington 6021, New Zealand. Tel:+64 4 918 6183. Fax:+64 4 389 5319. E-mail: nhung.nghiem@otago.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Enhancing carbon sequestration is crucial to mitigate rising global levels of greenhouse gases, and for developing countries, carbon sequestration may also provide economic benefits via international carbon trading schemes. This study aimed to determine the optimal management strategy for tropical planted forests when timber and carbon sequestration are valued. The survey data were collected from 291 household foresters, who were growing Eucalyptus urophylla and Acacia mangium in Yen Bai Province, Vietnam. The regression exercise suggests that financial status was negatively correlated with forest management practices, and ethnicity and financial status were correlated with carbon sequestration management. The survey results suggest that the mean rotation age employed by household foresters is five years. However, the optimization modelling suggests that the optimal rotation age for maximizing net present value is greater than nine years. The differences between current practices and optimal practices therefore favour a role for government policy interventions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 746 - 766
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adhikari, B., Di Falco, S., and Lovett, J.C. (2004), ‘Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal’, Ecological Economics 48(2): 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, R.H., Pattanayak, S.K., Yang, J.-C., Murray, B.C., and Abt, R.C. (2005), ‘Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis’, Forest Policy and Economics 7(3): 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, D.T. and Hong, B.N. (2006), ‘Payments for environmental services in Vietnam: assessing an economic approach to sustainable forest management’, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Singapore.Google Scholar
Diaz-Balteiro, L. and Rodriguez, L.C.E. (2006), ‘Optimal rotations on Eucalyptus plantations including carbon sequestration - a comparison of results in Brazil and Spain’, Forest Ecology and Management 229(1–3): 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolisca, F., Carter, D.R., McDaniel, J.M., Shannon, D.A., and Jolly, C.M. (2006), ‘Factors influencing farmers' participation in forestry management programs: a case study from Haiti’, Forest Ecology and Management 236(2–3): 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, E.V. (2002), ‘Government-initiated community resource management and local resource extraction from Nepal's forests’, Journal of Development Economics 68(1): 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englin, J. and Callaway, J. (1993), ‘Global climate change and optimal forest management’, Natural Resource Modeling 7(3): 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faustmann, M. (1849), ‘Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry’, Journal of Forest Economics 1(1995)(1): 7–44.Google Scholar
Gellrich, M., Baur, P., Koch, B., and Zimmermann, N.E. (2007), ‘Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: a spatially explicit economic analysis’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118(1–4): 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Y., Bull, G., and Baylis, K. (2010), ‘Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: the role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules’, Ecological Economics 69(6): 1292–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Vietnam (1997), ‘Nghị Quyết của Quốc hội Nước Cộng Hòa Xã Hội Chủ Nghĩa Việt Nam số 08/1997/QH10 về Dự án trồng mới 5 triệu ha rừng’ (Decision by The National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam No. 08/1997/QH10 regarding afforestation and reforestation of 5 million ha), Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (1999), ‘Decree of the Government on allocation of forest lands to households, individuals and organizations for long-term forestry purposes’, Decree No. 163/1999/QD-CP, 16 November 1999, Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2003), ‘Luật Đất đai của Quốc hội nước Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam số13/2003/QH11 về đất đai’ (Land-use Law by the Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam No. 13/2003/QH11 regarding land-uses), Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2005), ‘Quyết Định Số 170/2005/QĐ-TTg ngày 8/7/2005 của Chính phủ Ban hành chuẩn nghèo áp dụng cho giai đoạn 2006 - 2010’ (Decision No. 170/2005/QD-TTg, 8 July, of the Prime Minister regarding the standardised low income level in period 2006–2010), Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2006), ‘Nghi Dinh Chinh phu ve viec thuc thi Luat Bao ve va Phat trien Rung’ (Decree of the Government on implementation of the Law of Forest Protection and Development), Decree No. 23/2006/QD-CP, 3 March, Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2007), ‘Quyet dinh ve mot so co che, chinh sach tai chinh doi voi du an dau tu theo co che phat trien sach’ (Decisions on mechanisms and policies for CDM projects), No. 130/2007/QD-TTg, 2 August, Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2008), ‘Quyet dinh Chinh sach thi diem chi tra dich vu moi truong rung’ (Decisions on policies to implement a trial payment for environmental forest services), No. 380/2008/QD-TTg, 10 April, Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2009), ‘Quyet dinh cua Thu tuong Chinh phu ve viec ho tro lai suat cho cac to chuc, ca nhan vay von trung, dai han cua ngan hang de san xuat, kinh doanh’ (Decision of the Prime Minister regarding the subsidy interest rate from bank loans for individuals and organizations), Decision No. 443/2009/QD- TTg, 4 April, Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Government of Vietnam (2010), ‘Luật sửa đổi Luật Đật đai của Quốc hội nước Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam số13/2003/QH11 về đất đai’ (Modifications of the Land-use Law by the Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam No. 13/2003/QH11 regarding land-uses), Hanoi: Government of Vietnam.Google Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., and Wunder, S. (2005), ‘How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America’, World Development 33(9): 1511–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, G. and Kumareswaran, D. (2009), ‘Carbon subsidies, taxes and optimal forest management’, Environmental & Resource Economics 43(2): 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutrich, J. and Howarth, R.B. (2007), ‘Carbon sequestration and the optimal management of New Hampshire timber stands’, Ecological Economics 62(3–4): 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, H.M., Noordwijk, M. v., and Thuy, P.T. (2008), ‘Payment for environmental services: experiences and lessons in Vietnam’, Hanoi: World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF Vietnam.Google Scholar
Kideghesho, J., Roskaft, E., and Kaltenborn, B. (2007), ‘Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania’, Biodiversity and Conservation 16(7): 2213–2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantz, V. and Feng, Q. (2006), ‘Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where's the EKC?’, Ecological Economics 57(2): 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, D., Duff, E., and Elston, D. (2001), ‘Modelling the non-market environmental costs and benefits of biodiversity projects using contingent valuation data’, Environmental and Resource Economics 18(4): 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marey-Perez, M.F. and Rodriguez-Vicente, V. (2009), ‘Forest transition in Northern Spain: local responses on large-scale programmes of field-afforestation’, Land Use Policy 26(1): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Forestry (1996), National Exotic Forest Description. Regional Yield Tables as at 1 April 1995, Wellington: Ministry of Forestry Google Scholar
Nghiem, N. (2013), ‘Biodiversity conservation attitudes and policy tools for promoting biodiversity in tropical planted forests’, Biodiversity and Conservation 22(2): 373–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nghiem, N. (2014), ‘Optimal rotation age for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in Vietnam’, Forest Policy and Economics 38: 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nghiem, T.H.N. (2011), ‘Optimal forest management for carbon sequestration and biodiversity maintenance’, PhD thesis, Massey University, Manawatu, [Available at] http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/2669.Google Scholar
Nguyen, N.B., Nguyen, V.T., Bui, C.N., and Trinh, Q.T. (2006), ‘Why do farmers choose to harvest small-sized timber? A Survey in Yen Bai Province, Northern Vietnam’, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), Penang.Google Scholar
Phu, N.T. (2008), Ve chi tra dich vu moi truong rung o Viet Nam (About payment for environmental services in Vietnam), Hanoi, Goverment Office.Google Scholar
Roos, A. and Nyrud, A. (2008), ‘Description of green versus environmentally indifferent consumers of wood products in Scandinavia: flooring and decking’, Journal of Wood Science 54(5): 402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su-See, L. (1999), ‘Forest health in plantation forests in South-East Asia’, Australasian Plant Pathology 28(4): 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.P., Adams, D., and Sessions, J. (2009), ‘Radiative forcing and the optimal rotation age’, Ecological Economics 68(10): 2713–2720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC (1997), The Kyoto Protocol to UNFCCC, [Available at] http://www.unfccc.int.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2012), ‘The Kyoto Protocol Lives on: second commitment period secured in last minutes of Durban’, [Available at] http://unfccc.int/press/news_room/newsletter/in_focus/items/6672.php.Google Scholar
Valdivia, C. and Poulos, C. (2009), ‘Factors affecting farm operators' interest in incorporating riparian buffers and forest farming practices in northeast and southeast Missouri’, Agroforestry Systems 75(1): 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kooten, G.C., Binkley, C.S., and Delcourt, G. (1995), ‘Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(2): 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2003), Yield Table of 14 Dominant Tree Species in Productive Planted Forests in Vietnam, Hanoi: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2007), Forest Statistics, [Available at] http://www.kiemlam.org.vn/Desktop.aspx/News/So-lieu-dien-bien-rung-hang-nam/.Google Scholar
Vietnam Ministry of Resources and Environment (2012), Chi trả dịch vụ môi trường rừng: Vướng khâu đo đạc và xác định ranh giới rừng (Payment for forest environmental services: obstacles in measurements and indentifying forest boundaries), Hanoi: Ministry of Resources and Environment, [Available at] http://www.monre.gov.vn/v35/default.aspx?tabid=428&CateID=24&ID=115104&Code=5X0I115104.Google Scholar
Vo, D.H., Dang, T.T., Nguyen, H.T., Nguyen, V.B., and Dang, T.D. (2009), Productivity and Carbon Sequestration of Some Major Planted Forest in Vietnam, Hanoi: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
World Bank (2008), World Development Indicators 2007, Washington, DC: World Bank, [Available at] http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/ext/ddpreports/ViewSharedReport?&CF=&REP0RTJD=9147&REQUEST_TYPE=VIEWADVANCED&HF=N/CPProfile.asp&WSP=N.Google Scholar
Yen Bai Forestry Department (2008), Bao cao hien trang rung (Report on forest status), Hanoi: Yen Bai Forestry Department.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Nghiem Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Nghiem Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 110.5 KB