Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T07:13:31.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental policy in a linear city model of product differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

Ana Espínola-Arredondo
Affiliation:
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, 111C Hulbert Hall Pullman, WA 99164, USA. Tel: 509 335 8494. Fax: 509 335 1173. Email: anaespinola@wsu.edu
Huan Zhao
Affiliation:
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, USA. Email: huanzhao@wsu.edu

Abstract

This paper analyzes how a tax/subsidy policy affects consumers' behavior when choosing between green (pollution-free goods) and conventional products, and its effects on welfare when a proportion of consumers have strong preferences for green goods. We analyze a Hotelling's linear city model where final products by two firms are symmetric in all dimensions except for the externality their production process generates. Our efficiency comparisons suggest that, under a setting of horizontal product differentiation, an environmental regulation (either on polluting firms or consumers buying their products) yields higher social welfare than the absence of policy. Moreover, the proportion of consumers who prefer green products affects the welfare gains from a subsidy or tax policy.

Type
Theory and Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bansal, S. and Gangopadhyay, S. (2003), ‘Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(2): 333355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, K. (2005), ‘Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment’, Environmental & Resource Economics 31(1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R., Morgan, D.J., Radenovic, H., Renzi, S., and Born, B. (2007), ‘Seattle Food System Enhancement Project’, University of Washington, Program on the Environment Certificate in Environmental Management Keystone Project, 2006–2007, Department of Neighborhoods, Seattle.Google Scholar
Cornes, R. and Sandler, T. (1996), The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, 2nd ednNew York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cremer, H. and Thisse, J. (1999), ‘On the taxation of polluting products in a differentiated industry’, European Economic Review 43(3): 575594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, C. (2004), ‘Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated products example’, Resource and Energy Economics 26(3): 281293.Google Scholar
Kotchen, M. (2006), ‘Green markets and private provision of public goods’, Journal of Political Economy 114(4): 816834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. (2009), How green is my orange?’, New York Times, 22 January, pp. B1.Google Scholar
Moraga-Gonzalez, J.L. and Padro-Fumero, N. (2002), ‘Environmental policy in a green market’, Environmental & Resource Economics 22(3): 419447.Google Scholar
Parry, I., Williams, R., and Goulder, L. (1999), ‘When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37(1): 5284.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Ibeas, R. (2007), ‘Environmental product differentiation and environmental awareness’, Environmental & Resource Economics 36(2): 237254.Google Scholar
Sartzetakis, E., Xepapadeas, A., and Petrakis, E. (2009), ‘The role of information provision as a policy instrument to supplement environmental taxes: empowering consumers to choose optimally’, Working Paper No. 2009.46, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. (1974), ‘Prices vs. quantities’, Review of Economic Studies 41(4): 477491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar