Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T12:22:10.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the adoption of vegetative soil conservation measures on farm profit, revenue and variable cost in Darjeeling district, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2019

Chandan Singha Open the ORCID record for Chandan Singha [Opens in a new window]
Chandan Singha*
Affiliation:
Hindu College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: chandan@econdse.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of vegetative soil conservation practices (afforestation and/or bamboo planting) on farm profit and its components, revenue and variable cost. Since farmers self-select themselves as adopters of conservation measures, there could be a problem of selection bias in evaluating their soil conservation practices. We address the selection bias by using propensity score matching. We also check if there exists spatial spillover in adoption of vegetative conservation measures and how it affects matching. We use primary survey data from the Darjeeling district of the Eastern Himalayan region for the year 2013. Our results suggest strong spatial correlation. We find that the propensity score estimated from the spatial model provides better matches than the non-spatial model. While the results show that vegetative soil conservation can lead to significant gains in revenue, it also increases costs so that no significant gains in profit accrue to farmers.

Keywords

propensity score matchingsoil conservationspatial dependence

JEL classification

Q24: Land C11: Bayesian Analysis: General C21: Cross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile Regressions
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 529 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulai, A and Huffman, WE (2005) The diffusion of new agricultural technologies: the case of crossbred-cow technology in Tanzania. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, 645–659.Google Scholar
Adimassu, Z, Mekonnen, K, Yirga, C and Kessler, A (2014) Effect of soil bunds on runoff, soil and nutrient losses, and crop yield in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development 25, 554–564.Google Scholar
Anselin, L (2002) Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 27, 247–267.Google Scholar
Antle, JM and Diagana, B (2003) Creating incentive for the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in developing countries: the role of soil carbon sequestration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, 1178–1184.Google Scholar
Battaglini, M, Nunnari, S and Palfrey, T (2012) The free rider problem: a dynamic analysis. NBER Working Paper 17926, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bhutia, S (2014) Mountain people and their response to environment: a study of Darjeeling Himalaya. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences 4, 191–201.Google Scholar
Bizoza, AR and de Graaff, J (2012) Financial cost–benefit analysis of bench terraces in Rwanda. Land Degradation and Development 23, 103–115.Google Scholar
Bouma, J, van Soest, D and Bulte, E (2007) How sustainable is participatory watershed development in India? Agricultural Economics 36, 13–22.Google Scholar
Bravo‐Ureta, BE, Solis, D, Cocchi, H and Quiroga, RE (2006) The impact of soil conservation and output diversification on farm income in Central American hillside farming. Agricultural Economics 35, 267–276.Google Scholar
Caliendo, M and Kopeinig, S (2008) Some practical guideline for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Survey 22, 31–72.Google Scholar
Chirwa, PW, Akinnifesi, FK, Sileshi, G, Syampungani, S, Kalaba, FK and Ajayi, OC (2008) Opportunity for conserving and utilizing agrobiodiversity through agroforestry in Southern Africa. Biodiversity 9, 45–48.Google Scholar
Colney, TG (1999) GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics 92, 1–45.Google Scholar
Darjeeling District Administration (2012) Annual Admin Report. Available at http://darjeeling.gov.in/admin_rpt/Annual_Admin_Report201112.pdf.Google Scholar
Dehejia, RH and Wahba, S (1999) Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 1053–1062.Google Scholar
Duflo, E, Glennerster, R and Kremer, M (2007) Using randomization in Development Economics research: a toolkit. Discussion Paper No. 6059, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Faltemeier, L and Abdulai, A (2009) The impact of water conservation and intensification evidence for rice farmers in Ghana. Agricultural Economics 40, 365–379.Google Scholar
Feder, G and Slade, R (1985) The role of public policy in the diffusion of improved agricultural technique. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 423–428.Google Scholar
Gardner, K and Barrows, R (1985) The impact of soil conservation investments on land prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 943–947.Google Scholar
Godtland, EM, Sadoulet, E, Janvry, AD, Murgai, R and Ortiz, O (2004) The impact of farmer field schools on knowledge and productivity: a study of potato farmers in the Peruvian Andes. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53, 63–92.Google Scholar
Government of West Bengal (2010) West Bengal District Gazetteers, Darjeeling, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Heckman, JJ and Vytlacil, EJ (2007) Econometric evaluation of social programs, part I: causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. In Heckman, JJ and Leamer, E (eds). Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6B. Elsevier: North Holland, pp. 4779–4874.Google Scholar
Holland, PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 945–960.Google Scholar
Holloway, G, Lapar, M and Lucila, A (2007) How big is your neighbourhood? Spatial implications of market participation among Filipino smallholders. Journal of Agricultural Economics 58, 37–60.Google Scholar
Hueso-González, P, Ruiz-Sinoga, JD, Martínez-Murillo, JF and Lavee, H (2015) Overland flow generation mechanisms affected by topsoil treatment: application to soil conservation. Geomorphology 228, 796–804.Google Scholar
Imbens, GW and Wooldridge, JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47, 5–86.Google Scholar
Kalimpong Soil Conservation Division (2010) Annual Report 2009–2010. Directorate of Forest, Soil Conservation (North) Circle, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.Google Scholar
King, DA and Sinden, JA (1988) Influence of soil conservation on farm land values. Land Economics 64, 242–255.Google Scholar
Kuntashula, E and Mungatana, E (2015) Estimating the causal effect of improved fallows on environmental services provision under farmers’ field conditions in Chongwe, Zambia. Environment and Development Economics 20, 80–100.Google Scholar
Kurseong Soil Conservation Division (2011) Annual Report 2010–2011. Directorate of Forest, Soil Conservation (North) Circle, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.Google Scholar
Lal, R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627.Google Scholar
La Londe, RJ (1986) Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. The American Economic Review 76, 604–620.Google Scholar
Läpple, D and Kelley, H (2015) Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland. European Review of Agricultural Economics 42, 315–337.Google Scholar
LeSage, JP and Pace, RK (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Lopez, R (2002) The economics of agriculture in developing countries: the role of the environment. In Gardner, BL and Rausser, GC (eds). Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. 2A. North Holland: Elsevier, pp. 1213–1247.Google Scholar
Lutz, E, Pagiola, S and Reiche, C (1994) Economic and Institutional Analyses of Soil Conservation Projects in Central America and the Caribbean, vol. 8. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Maharashtra Forest Department (n.d.) Conservation of forest villages into revenue village and settlement of other old habitations. Available at http://mahaforest.gov.in/fckimagefile/Handbook-13.pdf.Google Scholar
Mandal, D and Sharda, VN (2013) Appraisal of soil erosion risk in the Eastern Himalayan region of India for soil conservation planning. Land Degradation and Development 24, 430–437.Google Scholar
Ma, S and Swinton, SM (2011) Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices. Ecological Economics 70, 1649–1659.Google Scholar
Mbaga-Semgalawe, Z and Folmer, H (2000) Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains. Land Use Policy 17, 321–336.Google Scholar
Mwango, SB, Msanya, BM, Mtakwa, PW, Kimaro, DN, Deckers, J and Poesen, J (2016) Effectiveness of mulching under miraba in controlling soil erosion, fertility restoration and crop yield in the Usambara mountains, Tanzania. Land Degradation and Development 27, 1266–1275.Google Scholar
National Land Use and Conservation Board (1992) Evaluation study of soil conservation in the river valley project of Teesta Catchment. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, SK and Burty, DT (2005) A spatial complementarity of forests and farms: accounting for ecosystem services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, 995–1008.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, SK and Kramer, RA (2001) Worth of watersheds: a producer surplus approach for valuing drought mitigation in eastern Indonesia. Environment and Development Economics 6, 123–146.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, SK and Mercer, DE (1998) Valuing soil conservation benefits of agroforestry: contour hedgerows in the Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Agricultural Economics 18, 31–46.Google Scholar
Shiferaw, B and Holden, ST (2001) Farm-level benefits to investments for mitigating land degradation: empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics 6, 335–358.Google Scholar
Soil and Land Use Survey of India (1992) Rapid Reconnaissance Survey. Available at http://www.slusi.dacnet.nic.in/rrs.pdf.Google Scholar
Somanathan, E (1991) Deforestation, property rights and incentives in Central Himalaya. Economic and Political Weekly 26, PE37–PE46.Google Scholar
Stocking, M and Murnaghan, N (2001) Handbook for the Field Assessment of Land Degradation. London: Earth Scan Publications.Google Scholar
Teklewold, H, Kassie, M and Shiferaw, B (2013) Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 597–623.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Matemba-Mutasa, R and Rusinamhodzi, L (2015) Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa. Soil and Tillage Research 146, 230–242.Google Scholar
Tirkey, LP and Nepal, P (2010) Tea planting in the Darjeeling Hills: geo-ecological impact and livelihood implications. Available at http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/HN/article/viewFile/7104/5766.Google Scholar
TNAU Agritech Portal (2015) Agro-climatic zones of India and Tamil Nadu – Ago ecological zones of India. Web portal run by Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Available at http://agridr.in/tnauEAgri/eagri50/AGRO101/lec07.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Dollar to Indian Rupee Spot Exchange Rates for 2013 from the Bank of England (2019) Historical Chart of U.S. Dollar to Indian Rupee. Available at https://www.poundsterlinglive.com/bank-of-england-spot/historical-spot-exchange-rates/usd/USD-to-INR-2013.Google Scholar
Van Oost, KK, Govers, GG, de Alba, SS and Quine, TA (2006) Tillage erosion: a review of controlling factors and implications for soil quality. Progress in Physical Geography 30, 443–466.Google Scholar
Walker, DJ and Young, DL (1986) The effect of technical progress on erosion damage and economic incentives for soil conservation. Land Economics 62, 83–93.Google Scholar
Wang, H, Iglesias, EM and Wooldridge, JM (2013) Partial maximum likelihood estimation of spatial probit models. Journal of Econometrics 172, 77–89.Google Scholar
Wossen, T, Berger, T and Di Falco, S (2015) Social capital, risk preference and adoption of improved farm land management practices in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics 46, 81–97.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Singha supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Singha supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 848.6 KB