Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T03:46:38.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic valuation of non-marketed wild edible plants in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2006

CLAUDIO O. DELANG
CLAUDIO O. DELANG*
Affiliation:
Center for Southeast Asian Studies (CSEAS), Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Tel: +81(0)75-7537327, Fax: +81(0)75-7537350 e-mail: delang@cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tropical forests can provide forest dwellers with a sizable proportion of their dietary needs. Yet, many development and conservation organizations tend to disregard these opportunities, promoting market-oriented reforms that aim at introducing cash crops and markets for non- timber forest products (NTFPs) in the name of poverty alleviation and/or biodiversity conservation. In so doing, they help relegate wild food plants to the position of food for the poor (De Beer & McDermott 1996; Neumann & Hirsch 2000), reserve food in case of famine (Takasaki et al. 2004), or food supplementing that produced on farm plots (Ousseynou & Tieguhong 2004). This comment discusses the economic rationale for the consumption of wild edible plants by forest-dwelling communities, comparing the results obtained from two methods of evaluation. The paper is based on one month of fieldwork during December 2004 carried out by the author together with Theresa Wong and two specially-trained research assistants in Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary (Western Thailand).

Type
Comment
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 285 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D. & Sailer, L. (1984) The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt, M. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beer, J. & McDermott, M. (1996) The Economic Value of Non-timber Forest Products in Southeast Asia. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IUCN.Google Scholar
Delang, C.O. (2006 a) Indigenous systems of forest classification: understanding land use patterns and the role of NTFPs in shifting cultivators’ subsistence economies. Environmental Management 37 (4): 470–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delang, C.O. (2006 b) Not just minor forest products: the economic rationale for the consumption of wild food plants by subsistence farmers. Ecological Economics 55 (2): 257–271.Google Scholar
Godoy, R., Lubowski, R. & Markandya, A. (1993) A method for the economic valuation of non-timber tropical forest products. Economic Botany 47 (3): 220–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, R., Brokaw, N. & Wilkie, D. (1995) The effect of income on the extraction of non-timber tropical forest products: model, hypotheses and preliminary findings from the Sumu Indians of Nicaragua. Human Ecology 23: 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R.P. & Hirsch, E. (2000) Commercialisation of Non-timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Ousseynou, N. & Tieguhong, J.C. (2004) Forest resources and rural livelihoods: the conflict between timber and non-timber forest products in the Congo Basin. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19 (4): 36–44.Google Scholar
Peters, C.M., Gentry, A.H. & Mendelsohn, R.O. (1989) Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 655–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearman, A. (1990) The effects of settler incursion on fish and game resources of the Yuqui, a native Amazonian society of eastern Bolivia. Human Organization 49: 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasaki, Y., Barham, B.L. & Coomes, O.T. (2004) Risk coping strategies in tropical forests: floods, illnesses, and resource extraction. Environment and Development Economics 9: 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollenberg, E. & Nawir, A.S. (1998) Estimating the incomes of people who depend on forests. In: Incomes from the Forest: Methods for the Development and Conservation of Forest Products for Local Communities, ed. Wollenberg, E. & Ingles, A., pp. 157–187. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar