Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:35:34.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regeneration of Quercus spp. along interactive forest boundaries in a fragmented peri-urban landscape of Mexico City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2019

Yilotl Cázares Open the ORCID record for Yilotl Cázares [Opens in a new window] ,
Pablo M Vergara  and
Arturo García-Romero
Yilotl Cázares*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geografía Física, Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito exterior S/N, CP 04510, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
Pablo M Vergara
Affiliation:
Departamento de Gestión Agraria, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av. Lib. B O’Higgins 3363, PC 7254758, Santiago, Chile
Arturo García-Romero
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geografía Física, Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito exterior S/N, CP 04510, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
*
Author for correspondence: Yilotl Cázares, Email: yilotlcazsan9@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Biodiversity conservation in forest fragments surrounded by a low-quality matrix requires an understanding of how ecological conditions prevailing in the matrix enter the fragments and interact with local habitat conditions. We assessed the regeneration of oak species along edge–interior gradients in forest fragments at the periphery of Mexico City. The abundance of oak saplings was sampled along transects to the forest, while the edge effect was analysed using segmented zero-inflated Poisson models for abundance data. Three oak species were dominant in terms of their relative abundances: Quercus laeta, Quercus castanea and Quercus obtusata. Regeneration of nine oak species responded nonlinearly to the edge distance, with greater sapling abundance from the edge up to 10 m into the fragment. Canopy cover and tree height decreased from edge to fragment interior, while saplings increased in open areas within the fragments (i.e., independent of edge distance). A posterior analysis indicated that Q. obtusata reacted positively to edges. These results indicate that oak regeneration is promoted by suitable habitat conditions near the boundaries. Therefore, we suggest that forest management should focus on promoting seed production and oak establishment in forest interior habitats.

Keywords

Bayesian inferenceecotonesedge effectfragmentationland-use changetemperate forest
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 1: Thematic Section: Bringing Species and Ecosystems Together with Remote Sensing Tools to Develop New Biodiversity Metrics and Indicators , March 2020 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benavides, R, Escudero, A, Coll, L, Ferrandis, P, Ogaya, R, Gouriveau, F, Valladares, F (2016) Recruitment patterns of four tree species along elevation gradients in Mediterranean mountains: not only climate matters. Forest Ecology and Management 360: 287–296.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, M, Davis, FW, Oyler, LD (1989) Interactions of factors affecting seedling recruitment of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) in California. Ecology 70: 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, CN, Merenlender, AM (2001) Determining the pattern of oak woodland regeneration for a cleared watershed in northwest California: a necessary first step for restoration. Restoration Ecology 9: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, DS, Sharik, TL, Isebrands, JG (1998) Regeneration of northern red oak: positive and negative effects of a competitor removal. Ecology 79: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, STA, Weatherns, KC, Jones, CG (2003) A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53: 750–759.10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0750:AFFATO]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotteau, JS, Ritchie, MW, Varner, JM (2014) A mixed-effects heterogeneous negative binomial model for postfire conifer regeneration in northeastern California, USA. Forest Science 60: 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Días, FS, Miller, DL, Marques, TA, Marcelino, J, Caldeira, MC, Cerdeira, JO, Bugalho, MN (2016) Conservation zones promote oak regeneration and shrub diversity in certified Mediterranean woodlands. Biological Conservation 195: 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duelli, P, Studer, M, Marchand, I, Jakob, S (1990) Population movements of arthropods between natural and cultivated areas. Biological Conservation 54: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewers, RM, Didham, RK (2006) Continuous response functions for quantifying the strength of edge effects. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, RT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology 10: 133–142.10.1007/BF00133027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, M, DeBlois, J (2007) Modelling tree recruitment with zero-inflated models: the example of hardwood stands in southern Québec, Canada. Forest Science 53: 529–539.Google Scholar
García-Romero, A (2002) An evaluation of forest deterioration in the disturbed mountains of western Mexico City. Mountain Research and Development 22: 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Romero, A, Vergara, PM, Granados-Peláez, C, Santibañez-Andrade, G (2019) Landscape-mediated edge effect in temperate deciduous forest: implications for oak regeneration. Landscape Ecology 34: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascon, C, Williamson, GB, Fonseca, G (2000) Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 288: 1356–1358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, JE, Gysel, LW (1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field–forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Aparicio, L, Zavala, MA, Bonet, FJ, Zamora, R (2009) Are pine plantations valid tools for restoring Mediterranean forests? An assessment along abiotic and biotic gradients. Ecological Applications 19: 2124–2141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granados, C, Serrano, D, García-Romero, A (2014) Efecto de borde en la composición y estructura de los bosques templados. Sierra de Monte-Alto, centro de México. Caldasia 36: 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guevara, S, Laborde, J, Sánchez-Ríos, G (2004) Rain forest regeneration beneath the canopy of fig trees isolated in pastures of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biotropica 36: 99–108.Google Scholar
Hall, DB (2000) Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects: a case study. Biometrics 56: 1030–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, J, Kroll, A, Giovanini, J, Duke, S, Betts, M (2011) Estimating thresholds in occupancy when species detection is imperfect. Ecology 12: 2299–2309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotze, DJ, Samways, MJ (2001) No general edge effects for invertebrates at Afromontane forest/grassland ecotones. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahti, DC (2001) The ‘edge effect on nest predation’ hypothesis after twenty years. Biological Conservation 99: 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, WF, Nascimento, HEM, Laurance, SG, Andrade, A, Ewers, RM, Harris, KE et al. (2007) Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis. PLoS One 2: e107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidicker, WZJ (1999) Responses of mammals to habitat edges: an overview. Landscape Ecology 14: 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenmayer, D, Fischer, J (2007) Edge effects. In: Managing and Designing Landscapes for Conservation: Moving from Perspectives to Principles , eds Lindenmayer, DB, Hobbs, RJ, pp. 165–178. Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Barrera, F, Armesto, JJ, Williams-Linera, G, Smith-Ramíez, C, Manson, RH (2007) Fragmentation and edge effects on plant-animal interactions, ecological processes and biodiversity. In: Biodiversity Loss and Conservation in Fragmented Forest Landscapes: The Forests of Montane Mexico and Temperate South America , ed. Newton, Adrian, pp. 69–101. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
López-Barrera, F, Manson, RH, González, E M, Newton, AC (2006) Effects of the type of montane forest edge on oak seedling establishment along forest-edge–exterior gradients. Forest Ecology and Management 225: 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Barrera, F, Newton, A (2005) Edge type effect on germination of oak tree species in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 217: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, AL (1995) Distance and non-randomness of seed dispersal by the dwarf cassowary Casuarius bennetti . Ecography 18: 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magrach, A, Rodríguez-Pérez, J, Campbell, M, Laurance, WF (2014) Edge effects shape the spatial distribution of lianas and epiphytic ferns in Australian tropical rain forest fragments. Applied Vegetation Science 17: 754–764.10.1111/avsc.12104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malt, JM, Lank, DB (2007) Temporal dynamics of edge effects on nest predation risk for the marbled murrelet. Biological Conservation 140: 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, MG, Bennett, EM, Gonzalez, A (2014) Forest fragments modulate the provision of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 909–918.10.1111/1365-2664.12241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murcia, C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naudiyal, N, Schmerbeck, J (2018) Linking forest successional dynamics to community dependence on provisioning ecosystem services from the Central Himalayan forests of Uttarakhand. Environmental Management 62: 915–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navarro-González, I, Pérez-Luque, AJ, Bonet, FJ, Zamora, R (2013) The weight of the past: land use legacies and recolonization of pine plantations by oak trees. Ecological Applications 23: 1267–1276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, CD, Burkhardt, EC, Skojac, DA (2005) The increasing scarcity of red oaks in Mississippi River floodplain forests: influence of the residual overstory. Forest Ecology and Management 210: 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olupot, W (2009) A variable edge effect on trees of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, and its bearing on measurement parameters. Biological Conservation 142: 789–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual, G, Molinas, M, Verdaguer, D (2002) Comparative anatomical analysis of the cotyledonary region in three Mediterranean basin Quercus (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinelli, G (2000) Oaks (Quercus sp.) and only oaks? Relations between habitat structure and home range size of the middle spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos medius). Biological Conservation 93: 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlikowski, NC, Coppoletta, M, Knapp, E, Taylor, AH (2019) Spatial dynamics of tree group and gap structure in an old-growth ponderosa pine–California black oak forest burned by repeated wildfires. Forest Ecology and Management 434: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-López, P, López-Barrera, F, García-Oliva, F, Cuevas-Reyes, P, González-Rodríguez, A (2013) Natural regeneration processes in oak forests: facilitating and limiting factors. Biologicals Special Publication 1: 18–24.Google Scholar
Peyras, M, Vespa, N, Bellocq, MI, Zurita, GA (2013) Quantifying edge effects: the role of habitat contrast and species specialization. Journal of Insect Conservation 17: 807–820.10.1007/s10841-013-9563-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porensky, LM, Young, TP (2013) Edge effect interactions in fragmented and patchy landscapes. Conservation Biology 27: 509–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana-Ascencio, PF, González-Espinosa, M, Ramírez-Marcial, N (1992) Acorn removal, seedling survivorship, and seedling growth of Quercus crispipilis in successional forests of the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119: 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Marcial, N (2003) Survival and growth of tree seedling in anthropogenically disturbed Mexican montane rain forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 881–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, L, Sisk, TD (2010) What is an edge species? The implications of sensitivity to habitat edges. Oikos 119: 1636–1642.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18414.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, LR, Fletcher, J, Battin Sisk, TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 491–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, MB, Westfall, JA, Woodall, CW (2017) Modeling browse impacts on sapling and tree recruitment across forests in the northern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47: 1474–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S, Pressey, RL, Faith, DP, Margueles, CR, Fuller, T, Stoms, DM et al. (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environmental and Resources 31: 123–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarlöv, HI (2001) Approaches to forest edges as dynamic structures and functional concepts. Landscape Research 26: 27–43.Google Scholar
Saunders, DA, Hobbs, RJ, Margules, CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–32.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaepfer, MA, Gavin, TA (2001) Edge effects on lizards and frogs in tropical forest fragments. Conservation Biology 15: 1079–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, S, Ayzama, S (2003) Rapid turnover and edge effects in dung beetle assemblages (Scarabaeidae) at a Bolivian Neotropical Forest–Savanna Ecotone. Biotropica 35: 394–404.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D, Thomas, A, Best, N, Lunn, D (2003) WinBUGS user manual. Version 1.4 MRC. Biostatistics Unit. Institute of Public Health and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK [www document]. URL https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/the-bugs-project-winbugs.Google Scholar
Stamps, J, Buechner, M, Krishnan, V (1987) The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. American Naturalist 129: 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, DL, Power, ME, Fagan, WF, Pickett, ST, Belnap, J (2003) A classification of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53: 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo, V, Carabias, J, Gonzales, C (1989) The Rural Population in Mexico: Eco-Friendly Alternatives . Collection Environment. No. 6. Mexico City, Mexico: Fundación Universo Veintuno.Google Scholar
Torres-Miranda, A, Luna-Vega, I, Oyama, K (2011) Conservation biogeography of red oaks (Quercus, section Lobatae) in Mexico and Central America. American Journal of Botany 98: 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hees, AFM, Clerkx, APPM (2003) Shading and root-shoot relations in saplings of silver birch, pedunculate oak and beech. Forest Ecology and Management 176: 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villard, MA (1998) On forest-interior species, edge avoidance, area sensitivity, and dogmas in avian conservation. Auk 115: 801–562.Google Scholar
Xiang, W, Lei, X, Zhang, X (2016) Modelling tree recruitment in relation to climate and competition in semi-natural Larix–Picea–Abies forests in northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management 382: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X, Lei, Y, Cai, D, Liu, F (2012) Predicting tree recruitment with negative binomial mixture models. Forest Ecology and Management 270: 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Shi, Y, Sichilima, AM, Zhu, M, Lu, J (2016) Evidence on the adaptive recruitment of Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis BL): influence on repeated germination and constraint germination by food-hoarding animals. Forests 7: 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurita, G, Pe’er, MI, Bellocq, M, Hansbauer, M (2012) Edge effects and their influence on habitat suitability calculations: a continuous approach applied to birds of the Atlantic forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuur, A, Ieno, N, Walker, N, Saveliev, A, Smith, G (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions . New York, NY, USA: Springer Science and Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cázares et al. supplementary material

Cázares et al. supplementary material

Download Cázares et al. supplementary material(File)
File 64.6 KB