Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T13:01:07.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Hydraulic Fracturing Threats to Species with Restricted Geographic Ranges in the Eastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Jennifer L. Gillen  and
Erik Kiviat
Jennifer L. Gillen
Affiliation:
Environmental and Urban Studies Program, Bard College, Annandale, New York
Erik Kiviat*
Affiliation:
Hudsonia Ltd., Annandale, New York
*
Erik Kiviat, Executive Director, Hudsonia Ltd., PO Box 5000, Annandale, NY 12504; (phone) 845-758-7273; (fax) 845-758-7033; (e-mail) kiviat@bard.edu
Get access

Abstract

High-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is a new technology that poses many threats to biodiversity. Species that have small geographic ranges and a large overlap with the extensively industrializing Marcellus and Utica shale-gas region are vulnerable to environmental impacts of fracking, including salinization and forest fragmentation. We reviewed the ranges and ecological requirements of 15 species (1 mammal, 8 salamanders, 2 fishes, 1 butterfly, and 3 vascular plants), with 36%–100% range overlaps with the Marcellus-Utica region to determine their susceptibility to shale-gas activities. Most of these species are sensitive to forest fragmentation and loss or to degradation of water quality, two notable impacts of fracking. Moreover, most are rare or poorly studied and should be targeted for research and management to prevent their reduction, extirpation, or extinction from human-caused impacts.

Environmental Practice 14:1–12 (2012)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 320 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 2010. Academy of Natural Sciences: Marcellus Shale Needs Scientific Study to Set Guidelines. PA Environment Digest, October 18, 2010. http://www.paenvironmentdigest.com/newsletter/default.asp?NewsletterArticleID=17078 (accessed May 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Arkema, K., Bernhardt, J., and Verutes, G.. 2011. Habitat Risk Assessment. Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Available at http://stanford.edu/~woodsp/natcap/invest/docs/21/habitat_risk_assessment.html (accessed May 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Ash, A.N. 1997. Disappearance and Return of Plethodontid Salamanders to Clearcut Plots in the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains. Conservation Biology 11(4):983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, R., and Lazell, J.. 2008. Sylvilagus obscurus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2011.2, http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/41301/0 (accessed April 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Besharse, J.C., and Holsinger, J.R.. 1977. Gyrinophilus subterraneus, a New Troglobitic Salamander from Southern West Virginia. Copeia 1977(4):624–634.Google Scholar
Bratton, S.P., and Meier, A.J.. 1998. Restoring Wildflowers and Salamanders in Southeastern Deciduous Forests. Restoration & Management Notes 16(2):158–165.Google Scholar
Bunch, M., Davis, R., Miller, S., and Harrison, R.. 2012. Appalachian Cottontail: Sylvilagus obscurus. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Columbia, 7 pp. Available at http://www.dnr.sc.gov/cwcs/pdf/AppalachianCottontail.pdf (accessed April 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Butterflies and Moths of North America (BAMONA). 2012. Montana State University, Bozeman. http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/species/ (accessed May 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Cannings, S., and Hammerson, G.. 2012. Sylvilagus obscurus. NatureServe Explorer, Arlington, VA. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Sylvilagus+obscurus (accessed August 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Cole, C.T., and Kuchenreuther, M.A.. 2001. Molecular Markers Reveal Little Genetic Differentiation among Aconitum noveboracense and A. columbianum (Ranunculaceae) Populations. American Journal of Botany 88(2):337–347.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B., and Robinson, G.R.. 2012. A Geographic Model to Assess and Limit Cumulative Ecological Degradation from Marcellus Shale Exploitation in New York, USA. Ecology and Society 17(2):art. 25. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04822-170225 (accessed August 21, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakare, S., Lennon, J.J., and Hillebrand, H.. 2006. The Imprint of the Geographic, Evolutionary and Ecological Context on Species-Area Relationships. Ecology Letters 9(2):215–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, M.B., DuRant, S.E., Ostby, B.J.K., Roberts, J.H., and Willson, J.D.. 2011. A Multi-taxa Biological Survey of Passage Creek, Virginia. Northeastern Naturalist 18(3):357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, L., Morse, L., Russell, C., Gottlieb, S., Pearson, J., Maybury, K., Neid, S., and Oliver, L.. 2009. Aconitum noveboracense. NatureServe Explorer, Arlington, VA. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ (accessed May 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Entrekin, S., Evans-White, M., Johnson, B., and Hagenbuch, E.. 2011. Rapid Expansion of Natural Gas Development Poses a Threat to Surface Waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9(9):503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J.P., Breisch, A.R., Ducey, P.K., Johnson, G., Behler, J.L., and Bothner, R.C.. 2007. The Amphibians and Reptiles of New York State: Identification, Natural History, and Conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 422 pp.Google Scholar
Habib, L., Bayne, E.M., and Boutin, S.. 2007. Chronic Industrial Noise Affects Pairing Success and Age Structure of Ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. Journal of Applied Ecology 44(1):176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerson, G. 2004. Plethodon nettingi. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2011.2, http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed May 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Hammerson, G., and Beachy, C.. 2004. Gyrinophilus subterraneus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2011.2, http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed March 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Hammerson, G., and Mitchell, J.. 2004. Plethodon punctatus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2011.2, http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed May 5, 2012).Google Scholar
Harnishfeger, R. 2010. Appalachian Cottontail. In Terrestrial Vertebrates of Pennsylvania: A Complete Guide to Species of Conservation Concern, Steele, M.A., Brittingham, M.C., Maret, T.J. and Merritt, J.F., eds. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 354–358.Google Scholar
Herfenist, A., Power, T., Clark, K.L., and Peakall, D.B.. 1989. A Review and Evaluation of the Amphibian Toxicological Literature. Canadian Wildlife Service [CWS] Technical Report Series 61. CWS, Ottawa, Canada, 222 pp.Google Scholar
Highton, R. 1999. Geographic Protein Variation and Speciation in the Salamanders of the Plethodon cinereus Group with the Description of Two New Species. Herpetologica 55(1):43–90.Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2011.2, http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed April 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Johnson, N. 2010. Pennsylvania Energy Impacts Assessment: Report 1—Marcellus Shale Natural Gas and Wind. The Nature Conservancy–Pennsylvania Chapter, Harrisburg, 46 pp. Available at http://www.nature.org/media/pa/pa_energy_assessment_report.pdf (accessed April 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Kiviat, E., and Schneller-McDonald, K.. 2011. Fracking and Biodiversity: Unaddressed Issues in the New York Debate. News from Hudsonia 25(1-2):1–3, 8–10.Google Scholar
LoGiudice, K. 2003. Trophically Transmitted Parasites and the Conservation of Small Populations: Raccoon Roundworm and the Imperiled Allegheny Woodrat. Conservation Biology 17(1):258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losey, J., Roble, S., and Hammerson, G.. 2011. Etheostoma camurum. NatureServe Explorer, Arlington, VA. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ (accessed August 22, 2012).Google Scholar
Marsh, D.M., Gorham, N.P., and Beckman, N.G.. 2005. Forest Roads as Partial Barriers to Terrestrial Salamander Movement. Conservation Biology 19(6):2004–2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (MNHESP). 2009. Bailey's Sedge (Carex baileyi). MNHESP, Massachusetts Division of Fish & Wildlife, Westborough, 2 pp.http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/species_info/nhfacts/carex_baileyi.pdf (accessed May 5, 2012).Google Scholar
Mitchell, J.C., Wicknick, J.A., and Anthony, C.D.. 1996. Effects of Timber Harvesting Practices on Peaks of Otter Salamander (Plethodon hubrichti) Populations. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 1(1):15–19.Google Scholar
NatureServe. 2012. NatureServe Explorer: An Online Encyclopedia of Life. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ (accessed October 13, 2012).Google Scholar
Naugle, D.E. 2011. Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation in Western North America. Island Press, Washington, DC, 305 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP). 2011. Online Conservation Guide for Celastrina neglectamajor. NYNHP, Albany. http://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=7871 (accessed April 19, 2012).Google Scholar
Noel, L.E., Pollard, R.H., Ballard, W.B., and Cronin, M.A.. 1998. Activity and Use of Active Gravel Pads and Tundra by Caribou, Rangifer tarandus granti, within the Prudhoe Bay Oil Field, Alaska. Canadian Field-Naturalist 112(3):400–409.Google Scholar
Noss, R.F., and Cooperrider, A.Y.. 1994. Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC, 416 pp.Google Scholar
Ohio Natural Heritage Program (ONHP). 2007. Aconitum noveboracense. Division of Wildlife, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus. http://ohiodnr.com/Portals/3/Abstracts/Abstract_pdf/A/Aconitum_noveboracense.pdf (accessed April 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Payne, J.L., and Finnegan, S.. 2007. The Effect of Geographic Range on Extinction Risk During Background and Mass Extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104(25):10506–10511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program (PNHP). 2012. Bluebreast Darter (Etheostoma camurum). PNHP, Harrisburg. 2 pp.http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/factsheets/11411.pdf (accessed April 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Petranka, J.W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 587 pp.Google Scholar
Petranka, J.W., Eldridge, M.E., and Haley, K.E.. 1993. Effects of Timber Harvesting on Southern Appalachian Salamanders. Conservation Biology 7(2):363–370.Google Scholar
Rowan, E.L., Engle, M.A., Kirby, C.S., and Kraemer, T.F.. 2011. Radium Content of Oil- and Gas-Field Produced Waters in the Northern Appalachian Basin (USA): Summary and Discussion of Data. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5135. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 31 pp. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5135/ (accessed October 14, 2012).Google Scholar
Rozell, D.J., and Reaven, S.J.. 2012. Water Pollution Risk Associated with Natural Gas Extraction from the Marcellus Shale. Risk Analysis 32(8):1382–1393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, C.W. 2011. Blind Rush? Shale Gas Boom Proceeds Amid Human Health Questions. Environmental Health Perspectives 119(8):a348–a353.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R.E., and Kiviat, E.. 2007. State Records and Habitat of Clam Shrimp, Caenestheriella gynecia (Crustacea: Conchostraca), in New York and New Jersey. Canadian Field-Naturalist 121(2):128–132.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L.B. 1986. On the Susceptibility of Different Species to Extinction: Elementary Instructions for Owners of a World. In The Preservation of Species, Norton, B.G., ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 226–242.Google Scholar
Stein, B.A., Kutner, L.S., and Adams, J.S.. 2000. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 339 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2012. Plants Database. USDA, Washington, DC. http://plants.usda.gov/java/ (accessed May 5, 2012).Google Scholar
US Energy Information Administration (US EIA). 2012. http://www.eia.gov (accessed October 13, 2012).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2010. Biological Indicators of Watershed Health: Minnows (Cyprinidae). USEPA, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/bioiweb1/html/fish_minnows.html (accessed August 21, 2012).Google Scholar
US Geological Survey (USGS). 2002. http://www.usgs.gov (accessed October 13, 2012).Google Scholar
Walton, D., Ormes, M., and Morse, L.. 2012. Taenidia montana. NatureServe Explorer, Arlington, VA. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Taenidia+montana (accessed August 21, 2012).Google Scholar
Warner, N.R., Jackson, R.B., Darrah, T.H., Osborn, S.G., Down, A., Zhao, K., White, A., and Vengosh, A.. 2012. Geochemical Evidence for Possible Natural Migration of Marcellus Formation Brine to Shallow Aquifers in Pennsylvania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109(30):11961–11966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, H.H. Jr., and Droege, S.. 2001. A Case for Using Plethodontid Salamanders for Monitoring Biodiversity and Ecosystem Integrity of North American Forests. Conservation Biology 15(3):558–569.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 424 pp.Google Scholar
Wyman, R.L. 1991. Multiple Threats to Wildlife: Climate Change, Acid Precipitation, and Habitat Fragmentation. In Global Climate Change and Life on Earth, Wyman, R.L., ed. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York, 134–155.Google Scholar
Wyman, R.L. 2003. Conservation of Terrestrial Salamanders with Direct Development. In Amphibian Conservation, Semlitsch, R.D., ed. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 37–52.Google Scholar
Yates, E.D., Levia, D.F. Jr., and Williams, C.L.. 2003. Recruitment of Three Nonnative Invasive Plants into a Fragmented Forest in Southern Illinois. Forest Ecology and Management 190(2-3):119–130.Google Scholar