Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:20:19.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An epidemic of cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O139 in Dhaka, Bangladesh: clinical and epidemiological features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. Mahalanabis*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
A. S. G. Faruque
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
M. J. Albert
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
M. A. Salam
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
S. S. Hoque
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
*
*Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr D. Mahalanabis. Associate Director In-Charge, Clinical Sciences Division, ICDDR. B. GPO Box 128. Dhaka. Bangladesh.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We describe the disease spectrum and socio-demographic and epidemiological features of an epidemic of cholera due to a new pathogen. Vibrio cholerae O139, in patients attending a very large hospital in the metropolitan city of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

This hospital treats 70000–90000 patients a year with diarrhoeal diseases. A 4% systematic sample of 1854 patients attending from January to April 1993 were studied.

Five hundred and two (27%) of the 1854 patients were culture positive for V. cholerae O139 and 63 (3%) were culture positive for V. cholerae O1 biotype El Tor. Patients with V. cholerae O139 were mainly adults with a short history of watery diarrhoea. Eight-three percent of patients had moderate to severe dehydration. All recovered except one 80-year-old man with compromised renal function who died. Seventy-eight percent of patients required initial intravenous rehydration followed by oral rehydration therapy with rice ORS; they also received tetracycline to reduce diarrhoea severity. Most patients were from urban slums with inadequate sanitation facilities and hygiene practices.

The newly recognized V. cholerae O139 infection produced an epidemic of severe dehydrating diarrhoea indistinguishable from clinical cholera in a population which experiences two epidemic peaks of cholera in a year due to V. cholerae O1. Infection with the latter does not appear to confer any cross-protection from V. cholerae O139. The new pathogen suppressed, albeit temporarily, V. cholerae O1. Unlike other non-O1 serogroups of V. cholerae this new serogroup appears to have epidemic potential.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

REFERENCES

1.Ramamurthy, T. Garg, S. Sharma, R. et al. Emergence of novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern and eastern India. Lancet 1993; 341: 703–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Albert, MJ. Siddique, AK. Islam, MS. et al. Large outbreak of clinical cholera due to Vibrio cholerae non-O1 in Bangladesh. Lancet 1993; 341: 704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Shimada, T. Nair, GB. Deb, BC. Albert, MJ, Sack, RB. Takeda, Y. Outbreak of Vibrio cholerae. non-O1 in India and Bangladesh. Lancet 1993; 341: 1347.Google Scholar
4.Morris, JO. Non-O group 1 Vibrio cholerae: a look at the epidemiology of an occasional pathogen. Epiderniol Rev 1990; 12: 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Khan, MU. Eeckels, R. Alam, AN. Rahman, N. Cholera, rotavirus and ETEC diarrhoea: some clinico-epidemiological features. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1988; 28: 485–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.World Health Organization. Programme for control of diarrhoeal diseases (CDD/83.3 Rev 1). In: Manual for laboratory investigation of acute enteric infections. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1987.Google Scholar
7.Monsur, KA. A highly selective gelatin-taurocholate-tellurite medium for the isolation of Vibrio cholerae. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1961; 55: 440–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Mclntyre, OR. Feeley, JC. Greenough, WB III. Benenson, AS. Hassan, SI. Saad, A. Diarrhoea caused by non-cholera vibrios. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1965; 14: 412–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Spira, WM. Daniel, RR. Ahmed, QS. Huq, A. Yusuf, A. Sack, DA. Clinical features and pathogenioity of O group 1 non-agglutinating Vibrio cholerae and other vibrios isolated from cases of diarrhoea in Dacca. Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of 14th Joint Cholera Research Conference. US Japan Cooperative Medical Science Program. Geographic Medicine Branch. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. NIH. 1978; 137–53.Google Scholar
10.Khan, MU. Shahidullah, M. Epidemiologic pattern of diarrhoea caused by non-agglutinating vibrios (NAG) and EF-6 organisms in Dhaka. Trop Geogr Med 1982; 34: 1927.Google Scholar
11.Aldova, E. Laznickova, K. Stepankova, E. Lietava, J. Isolation of non-agglutinable vibrios from an enteritis outbreak in Czechoslovakia. J Infect Dis 1968: 118: 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.World Health Organization. Outbreak of gastroenteritis by non-agglutinable (NAG) vibrios. Weekly Epidemiol Rec 1969; 44: 10.Google Scholar
13.Dakin, WPH. Howell, DJ. Sutton, RGA. O'Keefe, ME. Thomas, P. Gastroenteritis due to non-agglutinable (non-cholera) vibrios. Med J Aust 1974; 2: 487–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Wilson, R. Lieb, S. Robert, A. et al. Non-O group 1 Vibrio cholerae gastroenteritis associated with eating raw oysters. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 293–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed