Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:35:56.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacteriophage typing of staphylococcus aureus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. E. O. Williams
Affiliation:
Staphylococcal Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale
Joan E. Rippon
Affiliation:
Staphylococcal Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The routine methods for propagation of staphylococcal typing bacteriophages, and for their use in identifying strains of staphylococci, are described.

Most of the phages can be propagated in fluid media as well as on agar, and for some glucose-peptone-water is a better medium than nutrient or Todd-Hewitt broth.

Many phage filtrates derived from broth or agar propagation contain, in addition to the phage, an agent that inhibits the growth of staphylococci.

Investigations of variations in the routine typing technique showed that considerable latitude is permissible in the age of cultures used for typing and in the inoculation procedures. It is, however, important to test all phage filtrates after propagation for purity and freedom from the inhibitory agent; and to repeat the tests frequently during use to detect alterations in titre.

About 40% of staphylococci are not lysed by the phages used at their test dilution; about half of these untypable strains are lysed by undiluted phage filtrates.

An analysis was made of the results of typing 567 independent strains of staphylococci; 229 of these showed strong lysis by one or more phages, but there were no fewer than 82 distinct phage patterns represented, and only 118 strains were lysed strongly by a single phage. Certain phages tend to appear together in patterns and on the basis of such associations three main phage groups can be distinguished; they are known respectively as the ‘3A’, ‘6/47’ and ‘52’ groups.

No method was discovered for segregating patterns into ‘types’, but conventions have been devised on the basis of the variation observed in sets of strains from various sources, for distinguishing between different patterns.

We are deeply indebted to Dr V. D. Allison for teaching us the bacteriophage typing methods and for giving us the benefit of his wide experience.

We are grateful to the following for sending us phages, and in some cases discussing their results with us: Dr Phyllis Rountree, Sydney; Dr R. Wahl, Paris; Dr G. Wallmark, Stockholm; Dr H. Williams Smith, Poultry Research Station, and Mr A. M. Hood, Birmingham.

Our thanks are also due to Miss S. Mayo, Mrs E. Lyons and Mr D. Woodroof for technical assistance. The photographs for PI. 14 were taken by Mr W. Clifford.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

References

REFERENCES

Allison, V. D., Hobbs, Betty C. & Martin, P. H. (1949). A widespread outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth, Lond., 8, 38.Google ScholarPubMed
Barber, Maby, Hayhoe, F. G. J. & Whitehead, J. E. M. (1949). Penicillin-resistant staphylococcal infection in a maternity hospital. Lancet, ii, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. S. K. (1950). The symbiotic bacteriophages of Salmonella typhi-murium. J. Path. Bact. 62, 501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie, R. & Keogh, E. V. (1940). Physiological and serological characteristics of staphylococci of human origin. J. Path. Bact. 51, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, S. T. (1939). Classification of staphylococci by slide agglutination. J. Path. Bact. 48, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigie, J. & Felix, A. (1947). Typing of typhoid bacilli with Vibacteriophage. Suggestions for its standardization. Lancet, i, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, G. D., Kalz, G. & Foley, A. R. (1950). An investigation of an out break of staphylococcus folliculitis (pemphigus neonatorum) by the use of bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus pyogenes. Canad. med. Ass. J. 62, 219.Google Scholar
Elek, S. D. & Levy, E. (1950). Distribution of haemolysins in pathogenic and non-pathogenic staphylococci. J. Path. Bact. 62, 541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felix, A. (1951). Laboratory control of the enteric fevers. Brit. med. Bull. 7, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisk, R. T. (1942 a). Studies on staphylococci. I. Occurrence of bacteriophage carriers amongst strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. infect. Dis. 71, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, R. T. (1942 b). Studies on staphylococci. II. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus by means of bacteriophage. J. infect. Dis. 71, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, R. T. & Mordvin, Olga E. (1944). Studies on staphylococci. III. Further observations on the bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. Amer. J. Hyg. 40, 232.Google Scholar
Hartley, P. (1922). The value of Douglas's medium for the preparation of diphtheria toxin. J. Path. Bact. 25, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Betty C. (1948). A study of the serological type differentiation of Staphylococcus pyogenes. J. Hyg., Camb., 46, 222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, E. L. M. & Pownall, Margabet (1950). Food poisoning in Sheffield in 1949. Brit. med. J. ii, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oddy, J. G. & Clbgg, H. W. (1947). An outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning. Brit, med. J. i, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rountree, Phyllis M. (1947). Staphylococcal bacteriophages. V. Bacteriophage absorption by staphylococci. Austr. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 25, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rountree, Phyllis M. (1949 a). The phenomenon of lysogenicity in staphylococci. J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rountree, Phyllis M. (1949 b). The serological differentiation of staphylococcal bacteriophages. J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rountree, Phyllis M.Thomson, E. F. (1949). Incidence of penicillin-resistant staphylococci in a hospital. Lancet, ii, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwabacher, H., Cunliffe, A. C., Williams, R. E. O. & Harper, G. J. (1945). Hyaluroni-dase production by staphylococci. Brit. J. exp. Path. 26, 124.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1948 a). Investigations on the typing of staphylococci by means of bacteriophage. I. The origin and nature of lysogenic strains. J. Hyg., Camb., 46, 74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. (1948 b). Investigations on the typing of staphylococci by means of bacteriophage II. The significance of lysogenic strains in staphylococcal type designation. J. Hyg., Camb., 46, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1948 c). Calcium-deficient media: their effect on phage action. Nature, Lond., 161, 397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. (1948 d). The typing of staphylococci of animal origin by the bacteriophage method. J. comp. Path. 58, 180.Google ScholarPubMed
Todd, E. W.Hewitt, L. F. (1932). A new culture medium for the production of antigenic streptococcal haemolysin. J. Path. Bact. 35, 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, R. Josse-Goichot Jacqueline (1950 a). Le facteur bactériostatique des lysats bactériophagiques. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 230, 1703.Google Scholar
Wahl, R. Josse-Goichot Jacqueline (1950 b). Bactériostase et bactériolyse de bactéries dites phago-résistantes par des lysats bactériophagiques riches en produits bactériens. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 230, 1225.Google Scholar
Wahl, R. & Lapeyre-Mensignac, P. (1950 a). L' identification des staphylocoques par les bactériophages. I. Application aux staphylococcies cutanées récidivantes. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 78, 353.Google Scholar
Wahl, R. & Lapeyre-Mensignac, P. (1950b). L'identification des staphylocoques par les bactériophages. II. Essai de classification des staphylocoques par la méthode des phages. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 78, 765.Google Scholar
Wallmark, G. (1949). Fagtypning av patogena stafylokocker. Nord. med. 41, 806.Google Scholar
Welsch, M. Salmon J. (1950). Quelques aspects de la staphylolyse. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 79, 802.Google Scholar
Williams, S. Timmins Cecily (1938). An investigation of the source of staphylococcal infection in acute osteomyelitis. Med. J. Aust. ii, 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. & Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Typing of staphylococci by the bacteriophage method. Lancet, i, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar