Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T06:27:03.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calculation of the expected increases of coliform organisms, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, in raw blended mutton tissue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

M. G. Smith
M. G. Smith
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Food Research, Meat Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 12, Cannon Hill, Queensland 4170, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Samples of blended mutton tissue in small polyvinyl chloride sachets were incubated in water baths for different times and at varying temperatures. The temperature of each bath was recorded accurately throughout each experiment. Using equations previously derived for the lag and generation times of coliform organisms in blended mutton tissue, the expected increases of these bacteria were calculated from the time/temperature recordings. These were compared with the data obtained from plate counts made on the tissue samples in the sachets before and after incubation. The studies were done with a strain of Escherichia coli, one of Salmonella lyphimurium and the coliform organisms naturally present on sheep carcasses processed in a commercial abattoir. The calculated growth agreed closely with that measured. Therefore, if mutton, after overnight chilling, is warmed again to temperatures within the growth range of these bacteria, the possible increases in the numbers of cells present can be calculated directly from time and temperature measurements.

The implications for the present codes of practice in abattoirs are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 323 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

REFERENCES

Australian Exrport Meat Manual (1982). Department of Primary Industry. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Council Directive (1983). Amending Directive 64/433/E.E.C. on Health Problems Affecting Intra-Community Trade in Fresh Meat. Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C. (1964). Contamination of meat supplies. Health Congress of the Royal Society of Health, Torquay, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Mackey, B. M, Roberts, T. A., Mansfield, J. & Farkas, g. (1980). Growth of Salmonella on chilled meat. Journal of Hygiene 85, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratkowsky, D. A., Olley, J., McMeeekin, T. A. & Ball, A. (1982). Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. Journal of Bacteriology 149, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, W. J. (1936). The growth of micro-organisms on ox muscle. I. The influence of water content of substrate on rate of growth at 1 °C.Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research 9, 177–190.Google Scholar
Scott, W. J., & Vickery, J. R. (1930). Investigations on chilled beef. II. Cooling and storage in meatworks. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Bulletin No. 120.Google Scholar
Smith, M. G. (1985). The generation time, lag time and minimum temperature of growth of coliform organisms on meat, and the implications for codes of practice in abattoirs. Journal of Hygiene 94, 280–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United States Department Of Agriculture (1981). U.S. Inspected Meat and Poultry Packing Plants, Washington, D.C., USDA.Google Scholar