Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:14:40.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clonal study of enterotoxin-B producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. Renaud ,
N. Bornstein ,
H. Meugnier ,
F. Forey ,
M. Bes  and
J. Fleurette
F. Renaud
Affiliation:
Research Department of Medical Bacteriology (RDMB) and Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
N. Bornstein
Affiliation:
Research Department of Medical Bacteriology (RDMB) and Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
H. Meugnier
Affiliation:
Research Department of Medical Bacteriology (RDMB) and Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
F. Forey
Affiliation:
Research Department of Medical Bacteriology (RDMB) and Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
M. Bes
Affiliation:
Research Department of Medical Bacteriology (RDMB) and Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
J. Fleurette
Affiliation:
Research Department of Medical Bacteriology (RDMB) and Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté de Médecine Alexis-Carrel, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sixty-nine Staphylococcus aureus strains. 39 of which produced staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB + ) and 14 of which were associated with toxic shock (TS + ), were studied using the following markers: serotyping, phage typing, antibiotyping. ribotyping, zymotyping and pulsed-field electrophoresis typing. Analysis of the results showed that the enterotoxin B producing strains were derived from at least three clones: the first two consisted of methicillin-susceptible strains, while the third included the methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains. TS+ strains of non-genital origin appeared to be distributed between the three clones, with no specific characters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 112 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 501 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

REFERENCES

1.Musser, JM, Schlievert, PM, Chow, AW et al. , A single clone of Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of cases of toxic shock syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990: 87: 225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Hallander, HO, Körlof, B. Enterotoxin-producing staphylococci. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1967; 71: 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Mochmann, H, Rose, I, Richter, U, Karsch, W, Witte, W. Detection of enterotoxins in Staphylococcus aureus strains obtained from autopsy materials. In: Jeljaszewicz, J. ed. The staphylococci. Zbl Bakt Suppl 14. Stuttgart. New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. 1985: 349.Google Scholar
4.Melconian, AK, Fleurette, J, Brun, Y. Studies on Staphyloeocci from toxic shock syndrome in France, 1981–1983. J Hyg 1985: 94: 23–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Crass, BA, Bergdoll, MS. Involvement of staphylococcal enterotoxins in nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23: 1138–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Schlievert, PM. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B and toxic-shock syndrome toxin-1 are significantly associated with non-menstrual TSS. Lancet 1986; i: 1149–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Asheshov, EH, Coe, AW, Porthouse, A. Properties of strains of Staphylococcus aureus in the 94/96 complex. J Clin Microbiol 1977; 10: 171–8.Google Scholar
8.Melconian, AK, Brun, Y, Fleurette, J. Enterotoxin production, phage typing and serotyping of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical materials and food. J Hyg 1983: 91: 235–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Dornbusch, K, Hallander, HO. Transduction of penicillinase production and methicillin-resistance – enterotoxin B production in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Gen Microbiol 1973: 76: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Lee, VTP, Chang, AH, Chow, AW. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B among toxic shock syndrome (TSS)- and non-TSS-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Infect Dis 1992: 166: 911–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Bornstein, N, Tardy, F, Reat, S, Marmet, D, Dumain, MH, Fleurette, J. Détection par méthode immunoenzymatique (Méthode ELISA et technique de Dot Blot) de l'entérotoxine B et de la toxine du choc toxique (TSST-1) produite par des souches de S. aureus. In XIIIèmes Journées Nationales de Biologic, Lyon, 26 01 1990: 229–30.Google Scholar
12.Marples, RR, Yan Leeuwen, WJ. International committee on systematic bacteriology. Subcommittee on phage-typing of staphylococci. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37: 174–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Oeding, P. Serological typing of staphylococci. Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1952; 93: 356–63.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Fleurette, J, Modjadedy, A. Attempts to combine and simplify two methods for serotyping of Staphylococcus aureus. Zbl Bakt Parasit Infekt Hyg Abt 01 1976; Suppl 5: 71–80.Google Scholar
15.Eriesson, HM, Sherris, JC. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study. Path Microbiol Scand Sect B Suppl 1971; 217: 1–9.Google Scholar
16.Selander, RK, Caugant, DA, Ochman, H, Musser, JM, Gilmour, MN, Whittam, TS. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial populations: genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 51: 873–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Renaud, F, Etienne, J, Bertrand, A et al. , Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from an Albanian hospital. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 1493–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Schaffer, HE, Sederoff, RR. Improved estimation of DNA fragment length from agarose gel. Anal Biochem 1981: 115: 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Prévost, G, Pottecher, B, Dahlet, M, Bientz, M, Mantz, JM, Piémont, Y. Pulsed field electrophoresis as a new epidemiological tool for monitoring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 1991; 17: 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lina, B, Yandenesch, F, Etienne, J, Kreiswirth, B, Fleurette, J. Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsed-field electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992; 92: 133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Sneath, PHA, Sokal, RR. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: Freeman. 1973.Google Scholar
22.Varaldo, PE. The borderline methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrobial Chemother 1993; 31: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.De Buyser, ML, Morvan, A, Grimont, F, El Sohl, N. Characterization of Staphylococcus species by ribosomal RNA gene restriction pattern. J Gen Microbiol 1989; 135: 989–99.Google Scholar
24.De Buyser, ML, Morvan, A, Aubert, S, Dilasser, F, El Sohl, N. Evaluation of a ribosomal RNA gene probe for the identification of species and subspecies within the genus Staphylococcus. J Gen Microbiol 1992: 138: 889–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed