Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:14:16.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The diagnosis of salmonella abortion in cattle with particular reference to Salmonella dublin. A review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. Hinton
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, Avon BS18 7DU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The diagnosis of abortion in cattle caused by Salmonella dublin depends upon the isolation of the organism from either the products of conception, uterine discharges, vaginal mucus or milk together with serological evidence of active infection. S. dublin may be isolated when an active or a latent carrier cow aborts but in these cases an active infection will not be demonstrable. The retrospective identification of a case of S. dublin abortion may prove difficult as excretion of the organism is usually transient and the serum agglutinating antibodies frequently fall to low titres soon after the abortion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

References

REFERENCES

Avery, R. J. & Nillo, L. (1963). A note on salmonellosis in adult cattle caused by contaminated bone meal. Canadian Veterinary Journal 4, 73.Google ScholarPubMed
Bert, F. (1943). Gehäuftes Auftreten von Gärtnerinfektionen in einen Rinderbestande mit einen Abortusfall. Deutsche tierärztliche Wochenschrift/Tierärztliche Rundschau 51/49, 11.Google Scholar
Bishop, G., Schatz, W. & Canham, A. S. (1943). Salmonella enteritidis var. dublin, infection in adult cattle. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association 14, 67.Google Scholar
Carlson, V. L. & Snoeyenbos, G. H. (1972). Relationship of population kinetics of Salmonella typhimurium and cultural methodology. American Journal of Veterinary Research 33, 177.Google ScholarPubMed
Chattopadhyay, B. & Pilfold, J. N. (1976). The effect of prolonged incubation of selenite F broth on the rate of isolation of Salmonella from faeces. Medical Laboratory Sciences 33, 191.Google ScholarPubMed
Corbel, M. J. (1973). The direct fluorescent antibody test for detection of Brucella abortus in bovine abortion material. Journal of Hygiene 71, 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cottereau, P., Rancien, P. & Sendral, R. (1970). Enzooties d'avortements à Salmonella dublin sur des vaches du départements de Saône-et-Loire. Revue médicale et vétérinaire 5, 447.Google Scholar
Davies, G. & Sojka, W. J. (1971). Identification of a vaccine strain of Salmonella dublin. Veterinary Record 88, 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. R. (1975). Assessment of a new selective medium for the isolation of salmonellae. Journal of Medical Microbiology 8, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, S. M. (1969). Laboratory diagnosis of infectious bovine abortion. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 155, 1913.Google ScholarPubMed
Field, H. I. (1948). A survey of bovine salmonellosis in mid and west Wales. Veterinary Journal 104, 251, 294 and 325.Google ScholarPubMed
Findlay, C. R. (1971). The survival of Salmonella dublin in cattle slurry. Veterinary Record 89, 224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frik, J. F. (1969). Salmonella dublin infection in cattle in the Netherlands. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and relationship to fascioliasis. Proefschrift Fac. Diergeneesk. Rijksuniv. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Hall, M. L. M. & Taylor, J. (1970). Salmonella dublin: The relation between a living calf vaccine strain and those isolated from human and other sources. Veterinary Record 86, 534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, S. G. (1964). A comparison between calcium alginate and cotton wool in the examination of cattle for salmonellae. Journal of Medical Laboratory Technology 21, 120.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1967). The examination of samples infected with multiple salmonella serotypes. Journal of Hygiene 65, 423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1968). Elevated temperature incubation of enrichment media for the isolation of salmonellas from heavily contaminated materials. Journal of Hygiene 66, 377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1974). Isolation of Salmonellas. Public Health Laboratory Service Monograph Series No. 8. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1975). Studies on the isolation of Salmonella dublin. Journal of Hygiene 74, 369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). Optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 149.Google ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M. (1971). Salmonella abortion in cattle. Veterinary Bulletin 41, 973.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. (1972 a). The effect of the method of whey preparation on the clarity of whey and the salmonella whey agglutination test. Research in Veterinary Science 13, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. (1972 b). Thesis. Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, London.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. (1973 a). Salmonella dublin abortion in cattle. I. Observations on the serum agglutination test. Journal of Hygiene 71, 459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M. (1973 b). Salmonella dublin abortion in cattle. II. Observations on the whey agglutination test and the milk ring test. Journal of Hygiene 71, 471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M. (1974). Salmonella dublin abortion in cattle: Studies on the clinical aspects of the condition. British Veterinary Journal 130, 556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M. (1975). Salmonella dublin abortion in cattle: Incidence and epidemiology. British Veterinary Journal 131, 94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hynes, M. (1942). The isolation of intestinal pathogens by selective media. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 54, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, J. E. (1962). A discussion of the dynamics of salmonella enrichment. Journal of Hygiene 60, 193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kossakowska, A. & Kafel, S. (1972). Investigations on the toxic effect of selective enrichment media on the growth of some salmonella types. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute, Pulawy 16, 34.Google Scholar
Lawson, G. H. K., McPherson, E. A. & Wooding, P. (1974). The epidemiology of Salmonella dublin infection in à dairy herd. II. Serology. Journal of Hygiene 72, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1968). Avortements à Salmonella dublin chez les bovins en Moselle. Bulletin mensuel de la Société vétérinaire pratique de France 52, 351.Google Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1969). Avortements des bovins à Salmonella dublin serologie – Note conjointe sur un cas d'entérite bovine. Bulletin mensuel de la Société vétérinaire pratique de France 53, 211.Google Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1970). Les avortements des bovins à Salmonella dublin. Bilan de la recherche en Moselle en 1969. Bulletin mensuel de la Société vétérinaire pratique de France 54, 123.Google Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1971). Les avortements des bovins à Salmonella dublin. La fixation du complement. Bulletin mensuel de la Société vétérinaire pratique de France 55, 117.Google Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1972 a). Une nouvelle reaction d'hémolyse rapid appliqueé au diagnostic de la brucellose, de la salmonellose et de la maladie de johne chez des bovins. Revue médicale et vétérinaire 12, 1589.Google Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1972 b). Les avortements des bovins à Salmonella dublin étude conjointe aux avortements brucelliques s'étendant sur 4 années en Moselle. Bulletin Académie et Société Lorraines des Sciences 11, 132.Google Scholar
Le Guilloux, M. (1975). Contribution au diagnostic sérologique de la salmonellose bovine à Salmonella dublin. L'agglutination somatique rapide par chauffage et centrifugation. Revue médicale Vétérinaire 126, 641.Google Scholar
Le Minor, L. & Nicolle, P. (1964). Sur deux souches de Salmonella dublin possédant l'antigène Vi. Annales de l'institut Pasteur 107, 550.Google Scholar
Le Pennec, J. (1970). Incidence des salmonelles dans le contexte abortif bovin en Vendée. Bulletin mensuel de la Société vétérinaire pratique de France 54, 35.Google Scholar
McCaughey, W. J. & Hanna, J. (1969). The vaginal mucus test. Veterinary Record 85, 695.Google ScholarPubMed
McCaughey, W. J., McClelland, T. G. & Hanna, J. (1971). Some observations on Salmonella dublin infection in clinically healthy beef cattle. British Veterinary Journal 127, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, C. E., Martin, W. T. & Boring, J. R. (1966). Efficiency of cultures of rectal swabs and faecal specimens in detecting salmonella carriers: Correlation with numbers of salmonellas excreted. Journal of Hygiene 64, 261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maclaren, A. P. C. (1972). Association of Salmonella dublin in cattle with abortion in cattle. Veterinary Record 91, 687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magee, M. F. & Hinton, M. (1974). The growth of Salmonella dublin and Salmonella typhimurium on MacConkey media containing brilliant green. Medical Laboratory Technology 31, 175.Google ScholarPubMed
Pantekoek, J. F. C., A.Rhodes, C. S. Rhodes, C. S. & Saunders, J. R. (1974). Salmonella folliculitis in veterinarians infected during obstetrical manipulation of a cow. Canadian Veterinary Journal 15, 123.Google ScholarPubMed
Plinguier, J. (1974). Thesis, Ecole Nationale Vétérinarie D'Alfort.Google Scholar
Read, R. B. & Reyes, A. L. (1968). Variation in plating efficiency of salmonellae on eight lots of brilliant green agar. Applied Microbiology 16, 746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Report (1967). Report on the Animal Health Services in Great Britain 1966. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Report (1972). Animal Health 1971. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Report (1975). Animal Health 1973. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Richardson, A. (1973 a). The transmission of Salmonella dublin to calves from adult carrier cows. Veterinary Record 92, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, A. (1973 b). Obstetrical difficulty in Salmonella dublin carrier cows. Veterinary Record 92, 151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, A. & Fawcett, A. F. (1973). Isolation of Salmonella dublin. Tijdsehrift voor Diergeneeskunde 98, 681.Google ScholarPubMed
Seanson, D. C. (1975). A new selective medium for the isolation of salmonellae other than Salmonella typhi. Journal of Medical Microbiology 8, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1951). The typing of Salmonella dublin by means of bacteriophage. Journal of General Microbiology 5, 919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. (1952). The evaluation of culture media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. Journal of Hygiene 50, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. W. (1965). The immunization of mice, calves and pigs against Salmonella dublin and Salmonella cholerae-suis infections. Journal of Hygiene 63, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sojka, W. J., Thomson, P. D. & Hudson, E. B. (1974). Excretion of Salmonella dublin by adult bovine carriers. British Veterinary Journal 130, 482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thal, E. & Holmqvist, H. (1957). Observations on in vivo dissociation of Salmonella dublin. Nordisk Veterinärmediein 9, 421.Google Scholar
Veterinary Investigation Service (1975). Veterinary Record 96, 123.Google Scholar
Walton, J. R. (1972). Bacteriological, biochemical and virulence studies on Salmonella dublin. Veterinary Record 90, 236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, J. R. & Hadfield, G. E. (1975). Differentiation of rough field strains of Salmonella dublin from the part-rough vaccine strain HWS 51. Journal of Comparative Pathology 85, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1969). Salmonella dublin skin lesions in a veterinary surgeon. Lancet ii, 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, C. & Clark, J. (1974). The bacteriocinogenicity and bacteriocin sensitivity of Salmonella dublin. Research in Veterinary Science 17, 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, C. & Sojka, W. J. (1976). A study of the complement fixation test in Salmonella dublin infection. Research in Veterinary Science 21, 184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, C., Morris, J. A. & Sojka, W. J. (1975). A comparison of indirect haemaglutination tests and serum agglutination tests for the serological diagnosis of Salmonella dublin infection in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 131, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar