Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:46:50.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of alpha-chlorhydrin in sewer rat control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. V. Andrews  and
R. W. Belknap
R. V. Andrews
Affiliation:
Departments of Physiology and Biology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska USA 68178
R. W. Belknap
Affiliation:
Departments of Physiology and Biology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska USA 68178
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A single application of the male chemosterilant, α-chlorhydrin, to a problem sewer rat infestation resulted in reductions of rat numbers and distribution which was comparable to effects of warfarin baiting methods. Rat numbers were reduced by more than 85% by both methods. More rapid mortality and recruitment were evident for warfarin effects; the α-chlorhydrin treated population had a longer lag phase of growth so that reinfestation of sewer habitat to pre-treatment numbers, and distribution over a 40 square block area, required approximately 1·5–2 times longer after α-chlorhydrin treatment when compared with warfarin treatment. Comparisons of changes in rat densities in infested sewers following the two treatments indicate that recovery of warfarin treated populations is achieved by reproductive recruitment followed by dispersal while α-chlorhydrin treated populations recover by slower immigration and later reproductive recruitment. Alpha-chlorohydrin should be a useful addition to a limited arsenal of rat control agents because of its specificity for the Norway rat, its single dose effectiveness as a toxicant-chemosterilant, and its short environmental half-life.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 359 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, R. V., Belknap, R. W. & Keenan, E. J. (1974). Demographic responses of wild Norway rats to antifertility control measurements. Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 868–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R. V. & Belknap, R. W. (1975). An effective application of U-5897 to the control of established feral rats. Nebraska Medical Journal 60, 40–77.Google Scholar
Bowerman, A. M. & Brooks, J. E. (1971). Evaluation of U-5897 as a male chemosterilant for rat control. Journal of Wildlife Management 35, 618–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J. W. & Bowerman, A. M. (1966). Effects of Norbormide on sewer rats. Californian Vector News 13, 3–6.Google Scholar
Davis, D. E. (1961). Principles of population control by gametocides. Transactions of the. North American Wild and Natural Resources Conference 26, 100–107.Google Scholar
Gratz, N. G. (1973). A critical review of currently used single-dose rodenticides. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 48, 469–477.Google ScholarPubMed
Gwynn, G. W. & Kurtz, S. M. (1970). Acceptability and efficacy of an anti-fertility agent in Norway rats. Journal of Wildlife Management 34, 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffer, A. P. & Hamilton, D. W. (1970). Effects of U-5897 on fine structure of the rat epididymus. Analytical Record 166, 319.Google Scholar
Howard, W. E. & Marsh, R. E. (1969). Mestranol as a reproductive inhibitor in rats and voles. Journal of Wildlife Management 33, 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, W. B., Brooks, J. E., Bowerman, A. M. & Kaukeinen, D. E. (1975). Anti-coagulant resistance in Norway rata as found in U.S. cities. Pest Control 43 (4), 12–18.Google Scholar
Kennelly, J. J., Garrison, M. V. & John, B. E. (1970). Laboratory studies of the effect of U-5807 on the reproduction of wild male rats. Journal of Wildlife Management 34, 508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. E. & Howard, W. D. (1969). Evaluation of mestranol as a reproductive inhibitor of Norway rats in garbage dumps. Journal of Wildlife Management 33, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. E. & Howard, W. E. (1973). Prospects of chemosterilant and genetic control of rodenta. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 48, 309–316.Google Scholar