Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:50:35.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The intranasal infection of mice with Bordetella pertussis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Jean M. Dolby
Affiliation:
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Elstree, Hertfordshire
Doraine C. W. Thow
Affiliation:
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Elstree, Hertfordshire
A. F. B. Standfast
Affiliation:
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Elstree, Hertfordshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bordetella pertussis instified by the intranasal route into the lungs of mice multiply without difficulty even from small inocula, although B. pertussis is not a natural pathogen for mice and mouse to mouse infection could not be demonstrated. When the initial dose was large the bacilli multiplied until the number in the lungs reached a critical level at which the mouse died. With smaller doses the critical level was never reached; a maximum count was achieved in 10–14 days, after which the number of viable bacilli declined. These smaller doses were consistently non-lethal and the figures for the viable counts when plotted gave curves of typical shape which were called ‘sublethal curves’. The decline corresponded in time with the development of specific immunity. Growth in the lung during the first 4 days of the infection was exponential, the rate of increase in the viable count depending on the size of the inoculum; the smaller the inoculum the faster the increase. With infecting doses at about the critical level, the numbers did not increase during the first 3–4 days, and with larger doses they decreased during the first 2–4 days of infection.

Antiserum given with the inoculum reduced the number of viable organisms in the lung at once. Its effect was short-lived, because after 24 hr. the lung count rose; nevertheless, the initial check on the bacteria had converted a lethal in fection into a sublethal infection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, E. K. (1953). Active pertussis immunity in mice after recovery from pulmonary infection or vaccination agains. H. pertussis. Acta path. microbiol. scand. 32, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, E. K. & Bentzon, M. W. (1958). Comparison between pertussis vaccine potency assays in mice challenged by the intracerebral route and mice challenged by the intranassal route (sublethal dose). Acta path. microbiol. scand. 42, 333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, F. M. & Timmins, C. (1937). Experimental infection with Haemophilus pertussis in the mouse by intranasal inoculation. Brit. J. exp. Path. 18, 83.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. N. (1952). Active immunity in mice following the intranasal injection of sub-lethal doses of living Haemophilus pertussis. J. Path. Bact. 64, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolby, J. M. (1958). The separation of the histamine-sensitizing factor from the protective antigens of Bordetella pertuaris. Immunology, 1, 328.Google Scholar
Dolby, J. M. & Standfast, A. F. B. (1958). A comparison of passive protection tests against intranasal and intracerebral challenges with Bordetella pertussis. Immunology, 1, 144.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S. (1955). Multiplication of Haemophilus pertussis in the mouse lung following intranasal infection. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 33, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. E. (1951). A press for disrupting bacteria and other micro-organisms. Brit. J. exp. Path. 32, 97.Google ScholarPubMed
Meynell, G. G. & Meynell, E. W. (1958). The growth of micro-organisms in vivo with particedar reference to the relation between dose and latent period. J. Hyg., Camb. 56, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg., Camb. 38, 732.Google ScholarPubMed
Proom, H. (1947). The immunological aspects of experimental Haemophilus pertussis infection. J. Path. Bact. 59, 165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. (1938). A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Amer. J. Hyg. 27, 493.Google Scholar
Standfast, A. F. B. (1958). The comparison between field trials and mouse protection tests against intranasal and intracerebral challenges with Bordetella pertuesis. Immunology, 1, 135.Google Scholar