Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:57:06.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory and field evaluation of pyriminyl as a poison for Rattus norvegicus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

B. D. Rentnison ,
R. Redfern ,
A. C. Dubock ,
J. E. Gill  and
C. G. J. Richards
B. D. Rentnison
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Science Service, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
R. Redfern
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Science Service, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
A. C. Dubock
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Science Service, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
J. E. Gill
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Science Service, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
C. G. J. Richards
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Science Service, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Laboratory tests indicated that the optimum concentration for pyriminyl in rat baits was between 1% and 3%. In field trials in which 0·5% pyriminyl (the concentration in commercial use) was compared with 2·5% zinc phosphide for the control of rats on farms, the pyriminyl treatments were significantly less effective than the zinc phosphide even when the poisoned baits were left down for 7 days instead of 1 day after prebaiting. Both poisons were as effective in medium oatmeal bait as they were in medium oatmeal containing 5% corn oil and 5% sugar.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 347 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Dubock, A. C., & Kaukeinen, D. E. (1978). Brodifacoum (Talon Rodenticide), a novel concept. Proceedings of the Eighth Vertebrate Pest Conference, Sacramento, California, 1978, pp. 127–37.Google Scholar
Howard, W. E., & Marsh, R. E. (1974). Rodent control manual. Pest Control 42 (8), D-U.Google Scholar
Huson, L. W. (1980). Statistical analysis of comparative field trails of acute rodenticides. Journal of Hygiene 84, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. E. (1975). Recent and future developments in rodenticides. Bulletin of the Society of Vector Ecologists 2, 1–56.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. E., & Howard, W. E. (1975). A new series of acute rodenticides. International Pest Control 17 (6), 4–9.Google Scholar
Peardon, D. D. (1978). Vacor, a new rodenticide: its success in the field. Proceedings of the Eighth Vertebrate Pest Conference, Sacramento, California, 1978, pp. 120–1.Google Scholar
Prosser, P. R., & Karam, J. H. (1978). Diabetes mellitus following rodenticide ingestion in man. Journal of the American Medical Association 239 (12), 1148–50.Google Scholar
Ramkrishnan, L., & Suchak, P. B. (1975). ‘Vacor’ a new rodenticide from Rohm and Haas Company, Philadelphia. Proceedings of the All India Rodent Seminar, Ahmedabad, 1975, pp. 148–54.Google Scholar
Rennison, B. D. (1975). An example of the use of analysis of covariance for evaluating the results of field trials of rodenticides. EPPO Bulletin 5 (1): Guidelines for the Development and Biological Evaluation of Rodenticides, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Rennison, B. D. (1976). A comparative field trial, conducted without pre-treatment census baiting, of the rodenticides zinc phosphide, thallium sulphate and gophacide against Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 77, 55–62.Google Scholar