Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:58:23.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the Evolution of Immunity in Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

L. Noon
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute, and the Pathological Laboratory of the University of Cambridge.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following experiments constitute an attempt to follow out in detail the stages by which immunity is established, in the course of a generalised bacterial infection (Pseudotuberculosis of rabbits). Two aspects of immunity are considered, firstly the presence, in the circulating fluids, of specific antibacterial substances, and secondly the power of rapidly producing such substances in answer to the specific stimulus. That is to say, attention is directed, not only to the quantity of specific antibodies present on any day of the disease, but also to the response which the animal can make to various doses of bacterial vaccine. For the immune animal is both more vigorous and more sensitive than the normal, in its reaction to a renewed dose of poison (Wassermann and Citron, 1905). Naturally the facts established with regard to one disease only, cannot be predicated at once of other diseases, in other animals. Still it is hoped that the systematic study of one disease may give some help in coordinating the large but somewhat disjointed mass of clinical observation which is already available.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

References

Aldridge, A. R.. (1898). Note on the serum reaction of Mediterranean fever, and its treatment by antitoxic plasma. Lancet, Vol. I. p. 1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, A. J. (1907). The variations in scarlet fever of the opsonic power of streptococci. Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., Vol. XII. p. 113.Google Scholar
Bassett-Smith, . (1907). The treatment of Mediterranean fever by means of vaccines, with illustrative cases. Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. VII. p. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birt, C. and Lamb, J. (1898). Mediterranean or Malta fever, with special reference to the specific agglutinating substances which make their appearance in the blood in the course of that disease. Lancet, Vol. II. p. 701.Google Scholar
Brieger, and Ehrlich, (1892). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Milch immunisierter Thiere. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, Vol. XIII. p. 336.Google Scholar
Von Dungern, (1903). Die Antikörper. pp. 81et seq.Google Scholar
Durham, H. E. (1899). Some observations on the Micrococcus melitensis (of Bruce). Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., Vol. V. p. 377.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. (1908). Some observations on the opsonic index, with special reference to the accuracy of the method and to some of the sources of error. Practitioner, Vol. LXXX. p. 607.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. S. (1907). Report on the results of experiments in connection with antityphoid vaccine. Journ. of the Roy. Army Med. Corps, Vol. IX. p. 10.Google Scholar
Hektoen, L.. (1907). The opsonic index in certain acute infectious diseases. Centralbl. f. Bakt., I. Abt. Vol. XLIV. p. 456.Google Scholar
Hektoen, L. (1907). Is scarlet fever a streptococcus disease? Journ. American Med. Assoc., Vol. XLVIII. p. 1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, T. and Rankin, J. C. (1907). The opsonic and agglutinative power of blood serum in cerebrospinal fever. Brit. Med. Journ., Vol. II. p. 1414.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, A.. and Madsen, T. (1902). The fate of typhoid and cholera agglutinins during active and passive immunisation. Festskrift ved Indvielsen af Statens Serum Institut, Kopenhagen, No. VI. pp. 21 and 22.Google Scholar
Leishman, W. B. (1905). Report on the blood changes following typhoid inoculation. Antityphoid Inoculation Committee (Wyman and Sons, London).Google Scholar
Leishman, W. B., Harrison, W. S., Grattan, H. W. and Archibald, R. G. (1908). Report on further experiments in connection with antityphoid inoculation. Journ. of the Roy. Army Med. Corps, Vol. X. p. 583.Google Scholar
Leishman, W. B., Harrison, W. S., Grattan, H. W., Webb, A. L. A. and Kenedy, T. C. (1908). Third report on experiments in connection with antityphoid vaccine. Journ. of the Roy. Army Med. Corps, Vol. XI. p. 327.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. G. (1907). Opsonic content of the serum in the course of acute pneumonia. Trans. Pathol. Soc., Vol. LVII. p. 45.Google Scholar
Salomonsen, and Medsen, (1897). Recherches sur la marche de l'immunisation active contre la diphtérie. Ann. de l'inst. Pasteur, Vol. XI. p. 315.Google Scholar
Smallman, A. B. (1909). Preliminary note on the use of antityphoid vaccine in the treatment of enteric fever. Journ. of the Roy. Army Med. Corps, Vol. XII. p. 136.Google Scholar
Wassermann, A. and Citron, J. (1905). Ueber die Bildungsstätten der Typhusimmunkörper; ein Beitrag zur Frage der lokalen Immunität der Gewebe. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, Vol. L. p. 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassermann, A.. and Citron, J. (1905). Die lokale Immunität der Gewebe und ihre praktische Wichtigkeit. Deutsch. med. Wochenschr., Vol. XXXI. p. 1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. H.. (1908). Observations on the opsonic index in infants. Practitioner, Vol. LXXX. p. 635.Google Scholar
Wolf, H. E. (1906). Observations on the opsonic index and the antipneumococcal power of the blood in pneumonia. Journ. of Infect. Dis., Vol. III. p. 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1897). Note on the technique of serum diagnosis of acute specific fevers. Brit. Med. Journ., Vol. I. p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1901). On the changes effected by antityphoid inoculation in the bactericidal power of the blood; with remarks on the probable significance of these changes. Lancet, Vol. II. p. 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1903). A lecture on therapeutic inoculations of bacterial vaccines, and their practical exploitation in the treatment of disease. Brit. Med. Journ., Vol. I. p. 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1904). A short treatise on antityphoid inoculation (A. Constable, Westminster).Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1908). On some points in connection with vaccine-therapy and therapeutic immunisation generally. Practitioner, Vol. LXXX. p. 565.Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1908). Ueber die Prinzipien der Vaccintherapie. Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Arzte Verhandlungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. and Douglas, S. R. (1903). An experimental investigation of the rôle of the blood-fluids in connection with phagocytosis. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Vol. LXXII. p. 357.Google Scholar
Wright, A. E. (1904). Further observations on the rôle of the blood-fluids in connection with phagocytosis. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Vol. LXXIII. p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. E., Douglas, S. R., Freeman, J., Wells, J. H. and Fleming, A. (1907). Studies in connection with therapeutic immunisation. Lancet, Vol. II. p. 1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A. E. and Smith, F. (1897). On the application of the serum test to the differential diagnosis of typhoid and Malta fever. Lancet, Vol. I. p. 656.Google Scholar