Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T07:37:04.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On an Outbreak of Sore Throats and of Scarlet Fever caused by Infected Milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Arthur Newsholme
Affiliation:
Medical Officer of Health of Brighton.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The outbreak about to be described raises issues of practical importance which appear to make it worthy of record, in spite of the fact that owing to fear of injury to a particular dairyman it was impracticable to complete the evidence by making inquires at every house supplied with milk by him.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1902

References

page 156 note 1 Also given as (4) Group A.

page 156 note 2 In the neighbouring town of H. to which the dairyman P. (see p. 158) also supplies a portion of his milk one case of scarlet fever in which his milk was drunk was notified on Dec. 6th.

page 158 note 1 This doctor subsequently sent me the following letter:—“I saw K. ’s child on 1st Nov. suffering if I remember right from a mild influenza. There was certainly no throat affection or anything else suspicious. I gave directions for treatment and told them to let me know if the child did not at once get better, and I heard no more. The reason K. sent for me was, I think, that she was afraid it might be something infectious, as P. is very particular.”

page 167 note 1 Report of Med. Off. to the Loc. Gov. Board, New Series, No. VII. 1876, p. 72.Google Scholar

page 167 note 2 Annual Report, Borough of Hackney, 1900, p. 60.Google Scholar

page 169 note 1 “A National System of Notification and Registration of Sickness,” Journ. Roy. Statist. Soc. Vol. LIX. Part I.Google Scholar

“Possible Medical Extensions of Public Health Work,” Journ. State Med. 10 1901.Google Scholar