Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:08:34.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Influence of Boric Acid and Borax upon the General Metabolism of Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. W. Tunnicliffe  and
Otto Rosenheim
F. W. Tunnicliffe
Affiliation:
Professor of Materia Medica and Pharmacology in King's College, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both boric acid and borax are extensively used as food preservatives, and much interest attaches to the question of their influence if any upon the general nutrition of the consumer, especially children. Although this method of preserving food has existed for a comparatively long period there seems no agreement as to the harmfulness or otherwise of these substances when taken with a mixed diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1901 , pp. 168 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1901

References

1 Analyst, 1891, p. 126.Google ScholarPubMed

2 Journ. Americ. Chem. Soc., 1892, p. 4.Google Scholar

3 Lancet, 1896 (I.), p. 1516.Google Scholar

4 Analyst, 1897, xxii., p. 182.Google Scholar

5 Journ. Franklin Inst., 1899, p. 103.Google Scholar

6 Vierteljahrsschr. f. gerichtl. Medicin, 1900, p. 83.Google Scholar

7 Brit. Med. Journ., 1900, ii. p. 1.Google Scholar

8 Dietetic and Hygienic Gazette, 1893, p. 25.Google Scholar

9 Journ. Americ. Chem. Soc., 1897, p. 889.Google Scholar

10 Public Health, 1899, No. 3, p. 554.Google ScholarPubMed

11 loc. cit.

12 Ringer, , Journ. of Physiol. 1895, p. 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Maybery and Goldsmith's results, apparently in conflict with the above statement, are however vitiated by the variation in their control experiments.

1 Arch. f. exp. Path. u. Pharm. 1881, p. 149.Google Scholar

2 Lancet, 1899, ii. p. 1282.Google Scholar

3 Lancet, 1900, i. p. 228.Google Scholar

4 loc. cit.

5 The experiments of Annett (loc. cit.) in this regard cannot be considered conclusive. Vide Liebreich (Lancet, 1900, i. p. 13), and Rideal (loc. cit.).Google Scholar

6 These observations will be published in extenso elsewhere.

7 Comptes rendus, 1878, T. lxxxvii. p. 845.Google Scholar

8 Zeitschr. f. Biologie, 1880, p. 198.Google Scholar

9 American Journ. of Physiol. 1898, p. 1.Google Scholar

10 loc. cit.

1 Virchow, R., Berl. klin. Wochenschr. No. 1, 1884Google Scholar; Gaucher, , Bull. Méd., 1890, No. 46Google Scholar (quoted from Lehmann, , Die Methoden der prakt. Hygiene, Wiesbaden, 1901, p. 305), amongst many others.Google Scholar

2 Arch. f. Hygiene, 1884, ii. p. 75.Google Scholar

1 Zeitschr. f. Biologie, 1897, p. 287.Google Scholar

2 Die Arbeit der Verduaungsdrüsen, Wiesbaden, 1898.Google Scholar

1 Der Stoffwechsel des Kindes. Tübingen, 1896.Google Scholar

1 For this we are indebted to Mr Droop Richmond of the Aylesbury Dairy Co.

1 Zeitschr. für analyt. Chemie, 1889, p. 89.Google Scholar

2 Zeitschr. für physiol. Chemie, xxix. p. 151.Google Scholar

3 Zeitschr. für Biol., xxvii. p. 555.Google Scholar

4 Centralbl. f. Physiol., 1897, p. 434.Google Scholar It has been shown by the most recent workers that the initial precipitation of uric acid by means of ammonium chloride is just as reliable as the more complicated method of Salkowski-Ludwig when certain conditions are observed. Ritter, Folin, Wörner, etc.

5 Zeitschr. f. physiol. Chem., i. 70.Google Scholar See also Neubauer, and Vogel, , Analyse des Harns, p. 724.Google Scholar

1 Vide Droop, Richmond and Harrison, , Analyst, 1900, p. 116.Google Scholar

1 The term assimilation in this sense is perhaps not strictly correct, we do not purpose however entering here into the actual source of the faecal phosphorus.

1 In these remarks throughout the entire paper we refer to the average daily excretion in question.

1 Chittenden and Gies (loc. cit.), where also references to former observers are given.