Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:24:19.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the effect of penicillin upon Gram-negative bacteria. Penicillin-sulphonamide synergy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. T. Stewart
Affiliation:
From the City Hospital Laboratory, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of penicillin alone, and with sulphonamide upon various Gram-negative bacteria, has been investigated.

S. typhi, S. paratyphi B and strains of Proteus vulgaris were inhibited by penicillin in concentrations of 8–20 units/c.c. Certain coliforms were inhibited by 30–128 units.

Organisms which were inhibited to some extent by penicillin and sulphonamide acting separately were inhibited under experimental conditions at lower concentrations when both agents acted together. The mechanism of this reaction has been discussed.

A proportion of the insensitive coliform strains were identified as penicillinase producers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

References

REFERENCES

Bigger, J. W. (1944). Lancet, 2, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, J. W. (1946). Lancet, 1, 82.Google Scholar
Garrod, L. P. (1944). Lancet, 2, 674.Google Scholar
Harper, G. J. & Cawston, W. C. (1945). J. Path. Bact. 57, 59.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. F. & Sung, C. (1944). Amer. J. Dis. Child. 68, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobby, G. L. & Dawson, M. H. (1944). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 56, 184.Google Scholar
Klein, M. & Kalter, S. S. (1946). J. Bact. 51, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, G. (1946). J. Exp. Med. 83, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. T. (1945). Lancet, 2, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. R. & Levine, M. (1945). J. Bact. 49, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, J. (1943). Nature, Lond., 152, 245.Google Scholar