Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:53:51.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of acute respiratory disease in the community of Port Chalmers. II. Influenza A/Port Chalmers/1/73: intrafamilial spread and the effect of antibodies to the surface antigens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

L. C. Jennings  and
J. A. R. Miles
L. C. Jennings
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. A. R. Miles
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the first year of a study of respiratory disease in the semi-isolated community of Port Chalmers, New Zealand, an epidemic of clinical influenza occurred from which the variant influenza A/Port Chalmers/1/73 (H3N2) was isolated. Within a selected group of 26 families, 59 (46%) members had clinical or laboratory evidence of infection. During intrafamilial spread the infection frequency was highest for school-aged children (77%), followed by female adults (67%), infants (64%) and male adults (41%). The index infection in each family was a school-age child on 10 occasions, suggesting the role of this age group in the transmission of influenza A in this community. The secondary attack rate (SAR) of 58·3% was higher than expected.

In sera taken before the 1973 epidemic, 59% of family members had detectable HI antibody and 25% NI antibody to A/England/42/72 while 38% had detectable HI antibody and 8% NI antibody to A/Port Chalmers/ 1/73. The relation between pre-existing antibody and infection frequency is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , August 1978 , pp. 67 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Aymard-Henry, M., Coleman, M. T., Dowdle, W. R., Laver, W. G., Schild, G. C. & Webster, R. G. (1973). Influenzavirus neuraminidase-inhibition test procedures. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48, 199–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Bradstreet, C. M. P. & Taylor, C. E. D. (1962). Technique of complement-fixation test applicable to the diagnosis of virus diseases. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 21, 96–104.Google Scholar
Cooney, M. K., Hall, C. E. & Fox, J. P. (1972). The Seattle Virus Watch. III. Evaluation of isolation methods and summary of infections detected by virus isolations. American Journal of Epidemiology 96, 286–305.Google Scholar
Foy, H. M., Cooney, M. K. & Allan, I. (1976). Longitudinal studies of types A and B influenza among Seattle schoolchildren and families, 1968–1974. Journal of Infectious Diseases 134, 362–9.Google Scholar
Grist, N. R., Ross, C. A., Bell, E. J. & Stott, E. J. (1966). Diagnostic Methods in Clinical Virology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hall, C. E., Cooney, M. K. & Fox, J. P. (1973). The Seattle Virus Watch. IV. Comparative epidemiologic observations of infections with influenza A and B viruses, 1965–1969, in families with young children. American Journal of Epidemiology 98, 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, G. K. (1942). The quantitative determination of influenza virus and antibodies by means of red cell agglutination. Journal of Experimental Medicine 75, 49–64.Google Scholar
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1970). First outbreak of Hong Kong influenza in a general practice population in Great Britain. A field and laboratory study. British Medical Journal iii, 74–7.Google Scholar
Jennings, L. C., Macdiarmid, R. D. & Miles, J. A. R. (1978). A study of acute respiratory disease in the community of Port Chalmers. I. Illnesses within a group of selected families and the relative incidence of respiratory pathogens in the whole community. Journal of Hygiene 81, 49–66.Google Scholar
Jordan, W. S. Jr (1961). The mechanism of spread of Asian influenza. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 83, 29–35.Google Scholar
Kilbourne, E. D., Butler, W. T. & Rossen, R. D. (1973). Specific immunity in influenza –summary of influenza workshop. III. Journal of Infectious Diseases 127, 220–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B. R., Kasel, J. A. & Chanock, R. M. (1972). Association of serum anti-neuraminidase antibody with resistance to influenza in man. New England Journal of Medicine 286, 1329–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, D. F., Coleman, M. T., Dowdle, W. R. & Schild, G. C. (1975). Advanced Laboratory Techniques for Influenza Diagnosis. Immunological Series, no. 6, Procedural Guide, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service.Google Scholar
Philip, R. N., Bell, J. A., Davis, D. J., Beem, M. O., Beigelman, P. M., Engler, J. I., Mellin, G. W., Johnson, J. H. & Lerner, A. M. (1961). Epidemiolgic studies on influenza in familial and general population groups, 1951–1956. II. Characteristics of occurrence. American Journal of Hygiene 73, 123–37.Google Scholar
Schulman, J. L. (1970). Effects of immunity on the transmission of influenza: experimental studies. Progress in Medical Virology 12, 128–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Webster, R. G. & Layer, W. R. (1971). Antigenic variation in influenza virus biology and chemistry. Progress in Medical Virology 13, 271–338.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1973). Influenza. Weekly Epidemic Record 48, 396.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1974). Antigenic characteristics of current influenza A isolates: Recommended composition of influenza vaccines for use in the 1974–1975 season. Weekly Epidemic Record 49, 41–5.Google Scholar