Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:04:35.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The susceptibility of Rattus rattus and Bandicota bengalensis to a new anticoagulant rodenticide, flocoumafen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

V. R. Parshad  and
G. Chopra
V. R. Parshad
Affiliation:
AICRP on Rodent Control, Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
G. Chopra
Affiliation:
AICRP on Rodent Control, Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The anticoagulant rodenticide flocoumafen was evaluated against Rattus rattus and Bandicota bengalensis, In no-choice 24 h feeding tests 100% mortality occurred at 0·00125% concentration of the poison in the bait in the case of B. bengalensis and at 0·00375% in R. rattus. Feeding of 0·0025% poison bait in 1-day, no-choice and 2-day choice tests resulted in 60% and 75% mortality of R. rattus, respectively, and 100% of B. bengalensis. The differences between the consumption of plain food in the pretreatment period and of poison bait in no-choice tests were non-significant, except in one case. The rodents consumed significantly more (P < 0·01) poison bait than the plain alternative in the choice trials. Median period of survival and its 95% confidence limits of R. rattus and B. bengalensis, at the 100% mortality dose levels of the poison, were 6·3 (5·04–7·88) and 6·2 (4·92–7·81) days respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , June 1986 , pp. 475 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

REFERENCES

Bowler, D. J., Entwhistle, I. D. & Porter, A. J. (1984). WL 108366 – a potent new rodenticide. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference, Brighton.Google Scholar
Chopra, G. & Parshad, V. R. (1985). Evaluation of coumatetralyl against two predominant murid species. Journal of Hygiene 94, 327–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubock, A. C. (1980). The development and practical use of the novel anticoagulant rodenticide brodifacoum. Plant Protection Bulletin (Taiwan) 22, 223–238.Google Scholar
Litchfield, J. T. Jr. (1949). A method for rapid graphic solution of time per cent effect curves. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Experimental Therapeutics 97, 399–408.Google ScholarPubMed
Lund, M. (1981). Comparative effect of the three rodenticides warfarin, difenacoum and brodifacoum on eight rodent species in short feeding periods. Journal of Hygiene 87, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, R. E. (1977). Bromadiolone, a new anticoagulant rodenticide. EPPO Bulletin 7, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, A. P. (1978). Rodenticidal activity of bromadiolone a new anticoagulant. Proceedings of the 8th Vertebrate Pest Conference. Sacramento, pp. 122–126.Google Scholar
Parshad, V. R.Ahmad, N. & Chopra, G. (1985). Laboratory and field evaluation of brodifacoum for rodent control. International Biodeterioration 21, 107–112.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1973). Introduction to Biostatistics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar