Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:22:03.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Typhoid carriers and Vi agglutinins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Adrianus Pijper  and
Clarice G. Crocker
Adrianus Pijper
Affiliation:
From the authors' private laboratory, Pretoria, South Africa
Clarice G. Crocker
Affiliation:
From the authors' private laboratory, Pretoria, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Seven more carriers, all possessing appreciable quantities of Vi agglutinins, are added to those already known.

Vi agglutination tests performed on 2526 inhabitants of the Transvaal, both native and white, showed that 5·3 % had similar quantities of Vi agglutinins.

A fair number of these positive reactors were further examined for the presence of typhoid bacilli in their excreta, but the number of positive findings was very small.

It is argued that there are a large number of typhoid faecal carriers who are such minimal excreters that the typhoid bacilli in their stools escape detection.

We wish to thank Dr T. Lötter, Acting Medical Officer of Health of Pretoria, and his staff, for their kindly help in collecting the material for this paper. Our special thanks are due to Lieut.-Col. H. Nelson, Medical Officer of Health of Pretoria, now on active service, for his never-failing interest in our work which has been such a great encouragement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 1943 , pp. 201 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

References

REFERENCES

Bensted, H. J. (1940). J. Roy. Army Med. Cps, 74, 1.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, S. S. (1938). Brit. Med. J. 2, 1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, S. S., Speechly, C. G. J. & Singh, M. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 663.Google Scholar
Davis, L. J. (1940). J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 406.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. P. (1940). Amer. J. Hyg. 31, B 8.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1938). Lancet, 2, 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A., Krikorian, K. S. & Reitler, R. (1935). J. Hyg., Camb., 35, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, D. L. (1942). S. Afr. Med. J. 16, 168.Google Scholar
Giovanardi, A. (1936). Boll. Soc. Ital. Bologna sper. 11, 3, 163.Google Scholar
Giovanardi, A. (1936a). Boll. Soc. Ital. Bologna sper. 11, 10, 943.Google Scholar
Horgan, E. S. & Drysdale, A. (1940). Lancet, 1, 1084.Google Scholar
Lane, C. R. T. & Francis, A. E. (1938). Lancet, 1,612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, H. (1942). S. Afr. Med. J. 16, 283.Google Scholar
Pijper, A. & Crocker, C. G. (1937). J. Hyg., Camb., 37, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pijper, A. & Crocker, C. G. (1937a). S. Afr. Med. J. 11, 252.Google Scholar
Radowsky, H. (1942). Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 36, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. M. (1941). Lancet, 1, 389.Google Scholar