Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2009
The foregoing report of Professor van Loghem and his co-worker, Miss Benjamins, confirms the results found by Professor Beattie and Dr Lewis, concerning the bactericidal action in milk of the electric current of high voltage. It also proves that the sterilising power of electrical treatment with carbon electrodes is not inferior to that with copper electrodes. These results, and also my experience of the vitamin C sparing effect of the carbon electrodes, have caused me to recommend the use of this kind of electrode in the electric treatment of milk, provided that the milk used be fresh and that it contains but little oxygen. The same reservation applies to milk pasteurised by heat and to pure raw certified milk. It is important that the supply should be fresh.
page 461 note 1 van Leersum, (1925). Nederl. Tijdschr. v. Geneesk. Part 1, p. 338.Google Scholar
page 461 note 2 Beattie, and Lewis, (1920). On the destruction of Bacteria in Milk by Electricity. Med. Res. Council Special Report Series, No. 49 (London). Beattie and Lewis (1925). The Electric Current (apart from the heat generated). A bacteriological agent in the sterilisation of Milk and other fluids. J. of Hygiene, xxiv. 123–137.Google Scholar
page 462 note 1 Hoist, and Froelich, (1907). J. of Hygiens, vii. 634.Google Scholar
page 462 note 2 Delf, and Toser, (1918). Biochem. Journ. xii. 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 462 note 3 McGarrison, (1921). Studies in Deficiency Disease. Oxford Medical Publications. London.Google Scholar
page 463 note 1 van, Leersum (1925). Loc. cit. Google Scholar
page 464 note 1 Hess, and Weinstock, (1924). J. Am. Med. Ass. lxxxii. 952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 465 note 1 Supplee, and Bellis, (1922). J. of Dairy Sci. v. 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 465 note 2 Kohman, (1923). Industr. and Engin. Chem. xv. 237.Google Scholar
page 465 note 3 Landolt-Bornstein, . Physik. Chem. Tab. 1923, i. 766.Google Scholar