Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:24:39.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The experimental method and the problem of psychiatry as a science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Michael Shepherd
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editoriali
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , Settembre-Dicembre 1995 , pp. 167 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

REFERENCES

Bernard, C. (1927). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (translated by Greene, H.C.). Macmillan Co.: New York.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Goldberger, J. (1914). The aetiology of pellagra: the significance of certain epidemiological observations with respect thereto. Public Health Reports 29, 1683–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1962). General Psychopathology (translated by Hoenig, J. and Hamilton, Marian W.). Manchester University Press: Manchester.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Temkin, O. (1959). Scientific medicine and historical research. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 3, 70–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terris, M. (1964). Goldberger on Pellagra. Louisiana State University: Baton Rouge.Google Scholar