Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:40:50.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HAVING TO DO WITH KNOWLEDGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

Baron Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I articulate the value of the epistemic and the central importance of epistemology in response to a challenge from Allan Hazlett. I argue that epistemic evaluations should not be simply absorbed into a single, all-things-considered point of view.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 13 , Special Issue 4: 2015 Episteme Conference , December 2016 , pp. 549 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, J. 1982. ‘The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist.’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 28: 1–29.Google Scholar
Hazlett, A. 2016. ‘What Does “Epistemic” Mean?’ Episteme. doi: 10.1017/epi.2016.29.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. 2005. ‘The Wrong Kind of Reason.’ Journal of Philosophy, 102: 437–57.Google Scholar
Reed, B. 2015. ‘Reasons for Reasons.’ Episteme, 12: 241–7.Google Scholar
Reed, B. Forthcoming. ‘Practical Interests and Reasons to Believe.’ In Whiting, D. (ed.), Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, S. 2006. ‘Epistemic Partiality in Friendship.’ Ethics, 116: 498–524.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (ed.) 1973. ‘Deciding to Believe.’ In Problems of the Self, pp. 136–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar