Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T16:16:02.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A descriptive study of stress fractures in competitive event horses in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Emma Hayton
Affiliation:
School of Biological & Earth Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK
Jennifer C Sneddon*
Affiliation:
School of Biological & Earth Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK
Get access

Abstract

The impact of stress fractures on competitive event horses in the UK is completely unknown. Ninety-one replies to 450 questionnaires sent to competitive event riders across the UK indicated that 11 horses, representing 12% of the responders, had a confirmed stress fracture. As data on the total number of horses owned or ridden by the riders were not available, the true prevalence of stress fractures in this sample of horses could not be directly assessed. Within the bounds of this study, competitive level of the rider had a significant effect on stress fracture prevalence (X2(0.05, df. 2) = 24.74, P<0.05), as did years of eventing experience (X2(0.05, df. 1) = 27.80, P<0.01). Training regime was also influential (X2(0.05,df. 1) = 26.30, PX20.01). There was a predominance of fractures in geldings (X2(0.05, df. 1) = 24.45, P<0.03); however, geldings constituted 82% of reported cases. Thoroughbred cross horses had a significantly lower incidence of stress fractures than Thoroughbreds (X2(0.05, df. 1) = 20.82, P<0.01) but constituted only 18% of the sample. Horses in the oldest age category (9–12 years) had 6% of all stress fractures (X2(0.05, df. 2) = 24.54, P<0.1). All fractures occurred on the foreleg at the knee or below, with no significant effect of anatomical location. Seventy-three per cent of horses were not competing when diagnosed (X2(0.05, df. 1) = 22.27, P<0.1). These data indicate that useful preliminary data were yielded by the questionnaire and that further research with a larger sample size is justified.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Martin, RB, Gibson, VA, Stover, M, Gibeling, JC and Griffin, LV (1997). Residual strength of equine bone is not reduced by intense fatigue loading: implications for stress fracture. Journal of Biomechanics 30: 2109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Dyson, P (2003) Stress fractures: vets report Horse April 9598.Google Scholar
3Riggs, CM (2002). Fractures–a preventable hazard of racing thoroughbreds?. Veterinary Journal 163: 119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Pilsworth, R and Shepherd, M (1997). Stress fractures. In: Robinson, EN (ed) Current Therapy in Equine Medicine. Newmarket, UK: Saunders, pp. 104112.Google Scholar
5Wilson, AM, McGuigan, MP, Su, A and van den Bogert, AJ (2001). Horses damp the spring in their step. Nature 414: 895899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Martin, RB (1995). Mathematical model for repair of fatigue damage and stress fracture in osteonal bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 13: 309316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Johnston, AM and Loving, NS (1995). Veterinary Manual for the Performance Horse. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
8Nunamaker, DM, Butterweck, DM and Provost, MT (1990). Fatigue fractures in thoroughbred racehorses: relationships with age, peak bone strain and training. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 8: 604611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Pinchbeck, GL, Clegg, PD, Proudman, CJ, Morgan, KL, Wood, JLN and French, NP (2002). Risk factors and sources of variation in horse falls in steeplechase racing in the UK. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 55: 179192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Clegg, P (2002). Breaking point. Horse and Hound December, 1416.Google Scholar