Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T00:50:19.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimension of the generalized 4-corner set and its projections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

BALÁZS BÁRÁNY
BALÁZS BÁRÁNY*
Affiliation:
Department of Stochastics, Institute of Mathematics, Technical University of Budapest, 1521 Budapest, PO Box 91, Hungary (email: balubsheep@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last two decades, considerable attention has been paid to the dimension theory of self-affine sets. In the case of generalized 4-corner sets (see Figure 1), the iterated function systems obtained as the projections of self-affine systems have maps of common fixed points. In this paper, we extend our result [B. Bárány. On the Hausdorff dimension of a family of self-similar sets with complicated overlaps. Fund. Math. 206 (2009), 49–59], which introduced a new method of computation of the box and Hausdorff dimensions of self-similar families where some of the maps have common fixed points. The extended version of our method presented in this paper makes it possible to determine the box dimension of the generalized 4-corner set for Lebesgue-typical contracting parameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 1190 - 1215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Barański, K.. Hausdorff dimension of the limit sets of some planar geometric constructions. Adv. Math. 210 (2007), 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barreira, L.. A non-additive thermodynamic formalism and applications of dimension theory of hyperbolic dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 16 (1996), 871–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bárány, B.. On the Hausdorff dimension of a family of self-similar sets with complicated overlaps. Fund. Math. 206 (2009), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Falconer, K.. The Hausdorff dimension of self-affine fractals. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 103(2) (1988), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Falconer, K.. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. Wiley, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
[6]Falconer, K. J.. Techniques in Fractal Geometry. Wiley, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
[7]Falconer, K. and Miao, J.. Dimensions of self-affine fractals and multifractals generated by upper-triangular matrices. Fractals 15(3) (2007), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Feng, D.-J. and Wang, Y.. A class of self-affine sets and self-affine measures. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 11(1) (2005), 107–124.Google Scholar
[9]Hueter, I. and Lalley, S. P.. Falconer’s formula for the Hausdorff dimension of a self-affine set in ℝ2. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 15(1) (1995), 77–97.Google Scholar
[10]Lalley, S. P. and Gatzouras, D.. Hausdorff and box dimension of certain self-affine fractals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41(2) (1992), 533–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Pollicott, M. and Simon, K.. The Hausdorff dimension of λ-expansions with deleted digits. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347(3) (1995), 967–983.Google Scholar
[12]Simon, K. and Solomyak, B.. On the dimension of self-similar sets. Fractals 10(1) (2002), 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Simon, K., Solomyak, B. and Urbański, M.. Hausdorff dimension of limit sets for parabolic IFS with overlaps. Pacific J. Math. 201(2) (2001), 441–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Simon, K., Solomyak, B. and Urbański, M.. Invariant measures for parabolic IFS with overlaps and random continued fractions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), 5145–5164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar