Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-10T10:02:13.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symbolic dynamics for pointwise hyperbolic systems on open regions

Part of: Smooth dynamical systems: general theory Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Topological dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2024

CHUPENG WU  and
YUNHUA ZHOU
CHUPENG WU
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China (e-mail: 20200601008@cqu.edu.cn)
YUNHUA ZHOU*
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China (e-mail: 20200601008@cqu.edu.cn)
*
e-mail: zhouyh@cqu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under certain conditions, we construct a countable Markov partition for pointwise hyperbolic diffeomorphism $f:M\rightarrow M$ on an open invariant subset $O\subset M$, which allows the Lyapunov exponents to be zero. From this partition, we define a symbolic extension that is finite-to-one and onto a subset of O that carries the same finite f-invariant measures as O. Our method relies upon shadowing theory of a recurrent-pointwise-pseudo-orbit that we introduce. As a canonical application, we estimate the number of closed orbits for f.

Keywords

pointwise hyperbolicityMarkov partitionsymbolic dynamics

MSC classification

Primary: 37D25: Nonuniformly hyperbolic systems (Lyapunov exponents, Pesin theory, etc.) 37C05: Smooth mappings and diffeomorphisms
Secondary: 37B10: Symbolic dynamics 37C35: Orbit growth
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , First View , pp. 1 - 54
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, R. L. and Weiss, B.. Similarity of Automorphisms of the Torus (Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 98). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, R. L.. Symbolic dynamics and Markov partitions. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 35(1) (1998), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, R. L. and Weiss, B.. Entropy, a complete metric invariant for automorphisms of the torus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 57(6) (1967), 1573–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araujo, E., Lima, Y. and Poletti, M.. Symbolic dynamics for nonuniformly hyperbolic maps with singularities in high dimension. Preprint, 2020, arXiv:2010.11808.Google Scholar
Barreira, L. and Pesin, Y. B.. Nonuniform Hyperbolicity: Dynamics of Systems with Nonzero Lyapunov Exponents (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 115). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Ovadia, S.. Symbolic dynamics for non uniformly hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of compact smooth manifolds. J. Mod. Dyn. 13 (2018), 43–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Ovadia, S.. Summable orbits. J. Mod. Dyn. 19 (2023), 625–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470). Springer, Berlin, 1975, pp. 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzi, J.. The degree of Bowen factors and injective codings of diffeomorphisms. J. Mod. Dyn. 16 (2020), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Hu, H. and Zhou, Y.. SRB measures for pointwise hyperbolic systems on open regions. Sci. China Math. 63(9) (2020), 1671–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevich, B. M.. Topological entropy of a countable Markov chain. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 187(4) (1969), 715–718.Google Scholar
Gurevich, B. M.. Shift entropy and Markov measures in the space of paths of a countable graph. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 192(5) (1970), 963–965.Google Scholar
Hu, H.. Conditions for the existence of SBR measures for “almost Anosov” diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352(5) (2000), 2331–2367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H. and Vaienti, S.. Absolutely continuous invariant measures for non-uniformly expanding maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29(4) (2009), 1185–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H. and Young, L.-S.. Nonexistence of SBR measures for some diffeomorphisms that are “almost Anosov”. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 15(1) (1995), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaloshin, V. Y.. Generic diffeomorphisms with superexponential growth of number of periodic orbits. Comm. Math. Phys. 211(1) (2000), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katok, A.. Bernoulli diffeomorphisms on surfaces. Ann. of Math. (2) 110(3) (1979), 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Y.. Symbolic dynamics for one dimensional maps with nonuniform expansion. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 37(3) (2020), 727–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Y.. Symbolic dynamics for non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 41(9) (2021), 2591–2658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Y. and Matheus, C.. Symbolic dynamics for non-uniformly hyperbolic surface maps with discontinuities. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 51(1) (2018), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Y. and Sarig, O. M.. Symbolic dynamics for three-dimensional flows with positive topological entropy. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 21(1) (2018), 199–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarig, O. M.. Symbolic dynamics for surface diffeomorphisms with positive entropy. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26(2) (2013), 341–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinai, Y. G.. Construction of Markov partitions. Funct. Anal. Appl. 2(3) (1968), 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinai, Y. G.. Markov partitions and C-diffeomorphisms. Funct. Anal. Appl. 2(1) (1968), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar