Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:10:08.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Principles v. Rules in Financial Regulation: Re-assessing the Balance in the Credit Crisis Symposium at Cambridge University, 10–11 April 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Kern Alexander
Affiliation:
Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
Get access

Extract

The European Business Organization Law Review presents three articles, by Schwarcz, Kane and Mayes, analysing some of the main issues regarding principles versus rules in financial regulation. These articles result from papers presented at a symposium in April 2008 entitled ‘Principles v. Rules in Financial Regulation’ organised by the Centre for Financial Analysis and Policy and the Centre for Corporate and Commercial Law Studies at the University of Cambridge. The symposium attracted academics, policy-makers, regulators and practitioners from several leading jurisdictions representing a range of disciplines including accounting, economics, finance and law, who were invited to present papers on specific areas of the principles-versus-rules debate in financial regulation and to discuss the impact of the global credit and financial crisis on principles-based regulation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)