Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:24:16.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accidental subdural injection of local anaesthetic: diagnosis by pressure measurement and response to aspiration of injectate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

M. Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
N. Bano
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
A. Gaur
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
S. Kaushik
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
Get access

Abstract

A healthy 22-year-old man received an initial injection of 12 mL of lignocaine/bupivacaine solutions (2 mL test, then 10 mL) into an epidural catheter. This produced a satisfactory regional blockade that seemed to be epidural but, when a supplementary 6 mL injection was given 1 h later, the patient developed impaired motor function as far as the upper cranial nerves, with loss of pinprick sensation to the shoulder. The emergence of fluid dribbling freely from the catheter prompted measurement of the pressure, which was 36 mmHg. The fluid was proved not to be cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by the absence of glucose (on dextrostix), by the appearance of turbidity with added thiopentone, and later by microscopy. Slow aspiration of 7 mL of the presumed injectate reduced the pressure in the catheter to 8 mmHg, which promptly reversed the additional excessive blockade, allowing surgery to proceed uneventfully. The retrieval of injectate argues strongly that the catheter tip had found its way subdurally, and the promptness of the reversal with aspiration argues for a mechanical rather than a pharmacological cause for the extensive neurological dysfunction after the second injection. Pressure measurement and aspiration may be helpful in other similar cases.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
1997 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)