Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:54:47.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Combined antiemetic treatment with tropisetron and metoclopramide vs. metoclopramide alone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

L. Papadimitriou
Affiliation:
The Anaesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece
S. Livanios
Affiliation:
The Anaesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece
G. Katsaros
Affiliation:
The Anaesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece
D. Hassiakos
Affiliation:
The Anaesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece
T. Koussi
Affiliation:
The Anaesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece
T. Demesticha
Affiliation:
The Anaesthesiology Unit, Aretaieion Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective Female patients undergoing gynaecological procedures, especially laparoscopically, are at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. No available antiemetic is entirely effective. This double-blinded randomized trial examines the efficacy and safety of tropisetron and metoclopramide in combination and compares the results with metoclopramide alone in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.

Methods One hundred and twenty female patients scheduled for minor gynaecological laparoscopy, aged 27–43 years, were randomly allocated to receive pretreatment with metoclopramide 10 mg intravenously (n = 57) or tropisetron 5 mg with metoclopramide 5 mg (n = 63).

Results Fewer patients in the combined treatment group experienced postoperative nausea and vomiting (14% vs. 37%, P = 0.008) or needed rescue antiemetic treatment (3% vs. 16%, P = 0.038). No significant adverse events were observed.

Conclusions The combination of the antiemetics was superior, which is probably explained by the fact that the two drugs have different sites of action, thus preventing emesis by blocking different pathways.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2001 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)