Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:53:04.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Textiles – New Possibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Eva Andersson Strand ,
Karin Margarita Frei ,
Margarita Gleba ,
Ulla Mannering ,
Marie-Louise Nosch  and
Irene Skals
Eva Andersson Strand
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Karin Margarita Frei
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Margarita Gleba
Affiliation:
University College London, UK
Ulla Mannering
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Marie-Louise Nosch
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Irene Skals
Affiliation:
National Museum of Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Textile research has become an important field of archaeology. Although the established analytical methods are often viewed as specialized, their integration with other interdisciplinary approaches allows us to deal with broader archaeological issues and provides the interpretational base for a much more comprehensive investigation of textiles in ancient times. Analyses of fibres, dyes, archaeobotanical and archaeozoological remains, as well as palaeoenvironmental and geochemical investigations, provide information about available resources, while tool studies, experimental testing, and visual grouping are approaches that explore the technology and techniques. Together, these approaches can provide new knowledge about textile production and consumption and, thereby, about people and society in ancient times.

La recherche textile est devenue un domaine important de l'archéologie. Bien que les méthodes analytiques en vigueur soient souvent considérées comme spécialisées, leur combinaison à d'autres approches interdisciplinaires nous permet de traiter des questions archéologiques plus générales et apporte une base à interprétation pour étudier beaucoup plus en détail les textiles provenant des temps anciens. Des analyses de fibres, de teintures et de résidus archéobotaniques et archéozoologiques ainsi que des enquêtes paléoenvironnementales et géochimiques fournissent des informations sur les ressources disponibles, tandis que des études d'outils, des tests expérimentaux et le groupement visuel explorent technologie et techniques. La combinaison de ces deux approches peut apporter de nouvelles connaissances sur la production et la consommation de textiles, et de ce fait, sur les hommes et la société d'autrefois.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Textilforschung ist zu einem bedeutenden Feld der Archäologie geworden. Obwohl die angewendeten analytischen Methoden oftmals als spezialisiert angesehen werden, erlaubt uns ihre Integration in andere interdisziplinäre Ansätze, weiterführende archäologische Fragestellungen zu behandeln und bietet die Deutungsbasis für eine wesentlich umfassendere Erforschung antiker Textilien. Analysen von Fasern, Farben, archäobotanischen und archäozoologischen Resten wie auch umweltgeschichtliche und geochemische Untersuchungen erbringen Informationen über zugängliche Ressourcen, während Werkzeugstudien, experimentelle Arbeiten und visuelle Gruppierungen Ansätze sind, die Technologien und Techniken erforschen. Gemeinsam können diese Methoden neue Erkenntnisse über die Textilproduktion und -nutzung – und dabei über die Menschen und die Gesellschaft in früheren Zeiten – liefern.

Keywords

archaeologydyeexperimental archaeologyfibreisotopestextilestextile toolsarchéologieteinturearchéologie expérimentalefibreisotopestextilesoutils textilesArchäologieFarbeExperimentelle ArchäologieFaserIsotopeTextilienTextilwerkzeuge
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , 2010 , pp. 149 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfaro, C. and Karali, L. eds, 2008. Purpureae vestes II: Vestidos, Textiles y Tintes: Estudios sobre la produccion de bienes de consumo en la antiguidad. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Alfaro, C., Wild, J.P. and Costa, B., eds, 2004. Purpureae vestes: Actas del I Symposium Internacional sobre Textiles y Tintes del Mediterráineo en época romana (Ibiza, 8 al 10 de noviembre, 2002). Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Allaby, R.G., Peterson, G.W., Merriwether, D.A. and Fu, Y.-B., 2005. Evidence of the domestication history of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) from genetic diver-sity of the sad2 locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112(1):58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, E, 2003. Tools for Textile Production from Birka and Hedeby. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet (Birka Studies 8: Excavations in the Black Earth 1990–1995).Google Scholar
Andersson, E., 2007. Engendering Central Places: some aspects of the organisation of textile production during Viking Age. In Rast-Eicher, A. and Windler, R. (eds), Archäologische Textilfunde Archaeological Textiles NESAT IX: 148–153. Ennenda: ArcheoTex.Google Scholar
Andersson, E., Mårtensson, L., Nosch, M.-L. and Rahmstorf, L., 2008. New research on Bronze Age textile production. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 51:171–174.Google Scholar
Andersson Strand, E. and Nosch, M.-L., eds, forthcoming. Tools, Textiles and Contexts. Investigations of Textile Production in the Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Appleyard, J.M., 1960. Guide to the Identification of Animal Fibres. Leeds: Wool Industries Research Association.Google Scholar
Barber, E.J.W., 1991. Prehistoric Textiles. The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, E.J.W., 1999. The Mummies of Ürümchi. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Barker, G. and Rasmussen, T., 1998. The Etruscans. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, M., Mayr, A., Moser, L. and Rast-Etcher, A., eds, 2003. Textiles. Intrecci e tessuti dalla preistoria europea. Riva del Garda, Trento: Provincia Autonoma di Trento.Google Scholar
Beard, B.L. and Johnson, C.M., 2000. Strontium isotope composition of skeletal material can determine the birthplace and geographic mobility of humans and animals. Journal of Forensic Sciences 45(5):1049–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Bender, 1986. Forhistoriske textiler i Skandinavien. Prehistoric Scandinavian Textiles. Copenhagen: Det kgl. Nordiske Oldskriftselskab (Nordiske Fortidsminder, ser. B, 9).Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Bender, 1992. North European Textiles until AD 1000. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L., and Walton, P, 1986, Dyes and fleece types in prehistoric textiles from Scandinavia and Germany, Journal of Danish Archaeology 5:177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, L.V., Hattori, E.M., Taylor, H.E., Poulson, S.R. and Jolie, E.A., 2006. Isotope sourcing of prehistoric willow and tule textiles recovered from western Great Basin rock shelters and caves – proof of concept. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(11):1588–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A., 2003. Human mobility at the early Neolithic settlement of Vaihingen, Germany: evidence from strontium isotope analysis. Archaeometry 45(3):471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Price, T.D., Lüning, J., Gronenborn, D., Wahl, J. and Fullagar, P.D., 2002. Prehistoric migration in Europe: strontium isotope analysis of early Neolithic skeletons. Current Anthropology 43(5):799–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergfjord, C. and Holst, B., forthcoming. A new method for identifying textile bast fibres using microscopy. Ultramicroscopy.Google Scholar
Bichler, P., Grömer, K., Hofmann-De Keijzer, R., Kern, A. and Reschreiter, H., eds, 2005. Hallstatt Textiles: Technical Analysis, Scientific Investigation and Experiment on Iron Age Textiles. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1351).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnichsen, R., Hodges, L., Ream, W., Field, K.G., Kirner, D.L., Selsor, K. and Taylor, R.E., 2001. Methods for the study of ancient hair: radiocarbon dates and gene sequences from individual hairs. Journal of Archaeological Science 28(7):775–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgard, P. and Puybaret, M.P., 2004. Le travail de la laine au début de l'Empire: l'apport du modéle pompéien. Quels artisans? Quels équipements? Quelles techniques? In Alfaro, C. (ed.), Purpureae Vestes. Acts of the 1st International Symposium on Textiles and Dyes in the Mediterranean Roman World, 8 and 9 November 2002, Ibiza: 47–59. Valéncia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Cardon, D., 2007. Natural Dyes. Sources, Tradition, Technology and Science. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Christiansen, C.A., 2004. A reanalysis of fleece evolution studies. In Maik, J. (ed.), Priceless Invention of Humanity – Textiles. NESAT VIII: 11–18. Lodz: Lodzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Cybulska, M., Florczak, T. and Maik, J., 2010. Virtual reconstruction of archaeological textiles. In Andersson Strand, E.B., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgard, M. (eds), North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X: 36–40. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
De, Grossi, Mazzorin, J., 2004. Some considerations about the evolution of the animal exploitation in Central Italy from the Bronze Age to the Classical period. In Frizell, B. S. (ed.), PECUS. Man and Animal in Antiquity. Proceedings of the Conference at the Swedish Institute in Rome, September 9–12, 2002: 38–49. Rome: The Swedish Institute in Rome.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., 1982. The textile remains. In Young, R. S. (ed.), Gordion Excavation Reports I: Three Great Early Tumuli (P, MM, W): 294–310. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Franglpane, M., Andersson Strand, E., Laurito, R., Möller-Wiering, S., Nosch, M.-L., Rast-Eicher, A. and Wisti Lassen, A., 2009. Arslantepe (Turkey): textiles, tools and imprints of fabrics from the 4th to the 2nd millennium BC. Paléorient 35(1):5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, K. M., 2009. News on the geographical origin of the Gerum cloak's raw material. Journal of Swedish Antiquarian Research 104(4):313–315.Google Scholar
Frei, K. M., Frei, R., Mannering, U., Gleba, M., Nosch, M.-L. and Lyngstrøm, H., 2009. Provenance of ancient textiles – a pilot study evaluating the Sr isotope system in wool. Archaeometry 51(2):252–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, K. M., Skals, I., Mannering, U., Gleba, M. and Lyngstrøm, H., 2009. The Huldremose Iron Age textiles, Denmark: an attempt to define their provenance applying the strontium isotope system. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(9):1965–1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennard, D.E., 1985. Observations on the evidence for flax growth in Ireland provided by pollen analysis. Circaea 3(3):159–162.Google Scholar
Gilbert, T.P.M., Wilson, A., Bunce, M., Hansen, A., Willerslev, E., Shapiro, B., Highan, T., Richards, M., O'Connell, T. and Tobin, D., 2004. Ancient mitochondrial DNA from hair. Current Biology 14(12):R463–R464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleba, M., 2008. Textile Production in Pre-Roman Italy. Oxford: Oxbow Books (Ancient Textiles Series 4).Google Scholar
Good, I., 1999. The Ecology of Exchange: Textiles from Shahr-I Sokhta, Eastern Iran. Unpublished , University of Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
Grupe, G., Price, T.D., Schroter, P., Sollner, F., Johnson, C.M. and Beard, B.L., 1997. Mobility of Bell Beaker people revealed by strontium isotope ratios of tooth and bone: a study of southern Bavarian skeletal remains. Applied Geochemistry 12(4):517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hald, M., 1980. Ancient Danish Textiles from Bogs and Burials. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Hammarlund, L., 2005. Handicraft Knowledge Applied to Archaeological Textiles. The Nordic Textile Journal 2005: 86–119. Borås: University College of Borås.Google Scholar
Hammarlund, L. and Vestergård Pedersen, K., 2007. Textiles: appearance and visual expression - craft knowledge applied to archaeological textiles. In Rast-Eicher, A. and Windler, R. (eds), Architologische Textilfunde - Archaeological Textiles. NESAT IX, Braunwald, 18–21 Mai. 2005:213–219. Ennenda: ArcheoTex.Google Scholar
Hammarlund, L., Kirjavainen, H., Vestergård Pedersen, K. and Vedeler, M., 2008. Visual textiles: a study of appearance and visual impression in archaeological textiles. In Netherton, R. and Owen-Crocker, G. (eds), Medieval Clothing and Textiles 4:69–98. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haubrichs, R., 2005. L'étude de la pourpre: histoire d'une couleur, chimie et expérimentations. Preistoria Alpina 40(Suppl.1):133–160.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M., 1964. The Warp-Weighted Loom. Studies in the History and Technology of an Ancient Implement. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget (Studia Norvegica 14).Google Scholar
Karg, S., ed., forthcoming. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Cross-disciplinary investigations on the evolution and cultural history on flax and linen. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. Special Issue.Google Scholar
Kenward, H.K. and Hall, A.R., 1995. Biological Evidence from Coppergate. York: Council for British Archaeology (The Archaeology of York, 14/7).Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, H., 2002. Medieval archaeological textiles in Turku. In Helmig, G., Scholkmann, B. and Untermann, M. (eds), Centre - Region - Periphery (Vol. 2 of Medieval Europe): 346–351. Basle: Hertingen.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, A. and Hoffmann, M., 1991. Tekstiler. In Schia, E. and Molaug, P.B. (eds), De Arkeologiske Utgravninger i Gamlebyen, Oslo, Volume 8: 3–80. Oslo: Riksantikvaren/Universitetets Oldsakssamling.Google Scholar
Knudson, K.J., Tung, T.A., Nystrom, K.C., Price, T.D. and Fullagar, P.D., 2005. The origin of the Juch'uypampa Cave mummies: strontium isotope analysis of archaeological human remains from Bolivia. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(6):903–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, H., 1982. Kulturpflanzen von Tiryns. Archäologischer Anzeiger: 467–485.Google Scholar
Lalueza-Fox, C., Römpler, H., Caramelli, D., Stäubert, C., Catalano, G., Hughes, D., Rohland, N., Pilli, E., Longo, L., Condemi, S., De La Rasilla, M., Fortea, J., Rosas, A., Stoneking, M., Schöneberg, M.T., Bertranpetit, J. and Hofreiter, M., 2007. A Melanocortin 1 Receptor Allele suggests varying pigmentation among Neanderthals. Science 318(5855):1453–1455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambert, J.B., 1997. Traces of the Past. Unravelling the Secrets of Archaeology through Chemistry. Reading: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Lynnerup, N., 2007. Mummies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology: 162–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannering, U., Gleba, M., Heinemeier, J. and Possnert, G., 2010. Dating textiles and skins from bog finds by 14C-AMS. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(2):261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannering, U. and Gleba, M., forthcoming. Designed for Life and Death. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Mårtensson, L., 2007. Investigating the function of Mediterranean Bronze Age textile tools using wool and flax fibres. Experimentelle Archäologie in Europa Bilanz 6:97–106.Google Scholar
Mårtenssen, L., Nosch, M.-L. and Andersson Strand, B., 2009. Shape of Things: understanding a Loom Weight. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 28(4):373–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorriston, J., 1997. The fiber revolution. Textile extensification, alienation, and social stratification in ancient Mesopotamia. Current Anthropology 38(4):517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Médard, F., 2000. L'artisanat textile au Néolithique. L'exemple de Delley-Portalban II (Suisse) 3272–2462 avant J.-C. Montagnac: Editions Monique Mergoil (Collection Préhistoires vol. 4).Google Scholar
Möller-Wierng, S., 2010. War and Worship. Oxford: Oxbow Books (Ancient Textiles Series).Google Scholar
Müller, M., Murphy, B., Burghammer, M., Snigireva, I., Riekel, C., Gunnerweg, J. and Pantos, E., 2006. Identification of single archaeological textile fibres from the Cave of Letters using synchrotron radiation microbearn diffraction and microfluorescence. Applied Physics A 83:183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nockert, M. and Possnert, P., 2002. Att dattera textilier. Södertälje: Gidlunds Förlag.Google Scholar
Nosch, M.-L., forthcoming. L'archéologie expérimentale et les tests systématiques d'outils de la production textile. In Blondé, F. and Müller, A. (eds), L'artisanat en Gréce, table ronde, École française d'Athénes, octobre 2007.Google Scholar
Peacock, E.E., 2001. The contribution of experimental archaeology to the research of ancient textiles. In Walton Rogers, P., Bender Jørgensen, L. and Rast-Eicher, A. (eds), The Roman Textile Industry and its Influence. A Birthday Tribute to John Peter Wild: 181–192. Exeter: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Peek, C. and Nowak-Böck, B., 2007. 3D Computertomographie - Neue Möglichkeiten zur Untersuchung archäologischer Textilien. In Rast-Eicher, A. and Windler, R. (eds), Archälogische Textilfunde. Archaeological Textiles. NESAT IX: 79–85. Ennenda: ArcheoTex.Google Scholar
Plowman, J.E., Bryson, W.G. and Jordan, T.W., 2000. Application of proteomics for determining protein markers for wool quality traits. Electrophoresis 21(9):1899–1906.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, A.M. and Bray, P., 2007. A bicycle made for two? The integration of scientific techniques into archaeological interpretation. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polosmak, N.V. and Barkova, L.L., 2005. Костюм и текстиль пазырыкцев Алтая (IV–III в в. д о н. э.) Novosibirsk: Infolio.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Burton, J.H. and Bentley, R.A., 2002. The characterization of biologically available strontium isotope ratios for the study of prehistoric migration. Archaeometry 44(1):117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T.D., Grupe, G. and Schrotter, P., 1994. Reconstruction of Migration Patterns in the Bell Beaker Period by Stable Strontium Isotope Analysis. Applied Geochemistry 9(4):413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T.D., Knipper, C., Grupe, G. and Smrcka, V., 2004. Strontium isotopes and prehistoric human migration: the Bell Beaker period in Central Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 7(1):9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T.D., Manzanilla, L. and Middleton, W.D., 2000. Immigration and the ancient city of Teotihuacan in Mexico: a study using strontium isotope ratios in human bone and teeth. Journal of Archaeological Science 27(10):903–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, F., 2006. Clothing Culture: Dress in Egypt in the First Millennium AD. Manchester: The Whitworth Art Gallery, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A., 2005. Bast before wool: the first textiles. In Bichler, P., Grömer, K., Hofmann-De Keijzer, R., Kern, A. and Reschreiter, H. (eds), Hallstatt Textiles: Technical Analysis, Scientific Investigation and Experiment on Iron Age Textiles: 117–131. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1351).Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A., 2008. Textilien, Wolle, Schafe der Eisenzeit in der Schweiz. Basel: Archäologie Schweiz (Antigua 44).Google Scholar
Reese, D.S., 2005. Whale bones and shell purple-dye at Motya (western Sicily, Italy). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 24(2):107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. and Bahn, P., 2008. Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice (Fifth Edition). London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Ryder, M.L., 1969. Changes in the fleece of sheep following domestication. In Ucko, P.J. and Dimbleby, G.W. (eds), The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals: 495–521. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ryder, M.L., 1974. Wools from antiquity. Textile History 5:100–110. Guilford: Maney Publishing.Google Scholar
Ryder, M.L., 1983. Sheep and Man. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ryder, M.L., 1992. The interaction between biological and technological change during the development of different fleece types in sheep. Anthropozoologica 16:131–140.Google Scholar
Schierer, I., 2005. Experiments with the warp-weighted loom of Gars-Thunau, Austria. In Bichler, P., Grömer, K., Hofmann-De Keijzer, R., Kern, A. and Reschreiter, H. (eds), Hallstatt Textiles: Technical Analysis, Scientific Investigation and Experiment on Iron Age Textiles: 101–105. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1351).Google Scholar
Schlabow, K., 1976. Textilfunde der Eisenzeit in Norddeutschland. Neumünster: K. Wachholtz (Göttinger Schriften zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte Bd. 15).Google Scholar
Schmidt Colinet, A., Stauffer, A. and Al-As'Ad, K., 2000. Die Textilien aus Palmyra. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Schrenk, S., 2004. Textilien des Mittelmeerraumes aus spätantiker bis früislamischer Zeit. Riggisberg: Abegg-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Schweissing, M.M. and Grupe, G., 2003. Stable strontium isotopes in human teeth and bone: a key to migration events of the late Roman period in Bavaria. Journal of Archaeological Science 30(11):1373–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden Berghe, I., 2002. Appendice 1: analisi del colore. In von Eles, P. (ed.), Guerriero e sacerdote. Autorit´ e comunita nell'et´ del ferro a Verucchio. La Tomba del Trono: 220. Florence: All'Insegna dell Giglio.Google Scholar
Vanden Berghe, I., Gleba, M. and Mannering, U., 2009. Towards the identification of dyestuffs in Early Iron Age Scandinavian peat bog textiles. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(9):1910–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden Berghe, I., Gleba, M. and Mannering, U., 2010. Dyes: to be or not to be? Investigation of dyeing in Early Iron Age Danish bog textiles. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgaard, M. (eds), North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X: 247–251. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Van Der Plicht, J., Van Der Sanden, W.A.B., Aerts, A.T. and Streurman, H.J., 2004. Dating bog bodies by means of 14C-AMS. Journal of Archaeological Science 31(4):471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Carnap-Bornheim, C., Nosch, M.L., Grupe, G., Mekota, A.M. and Schweissing, M.M., 2007. Stable strontium isotopic ratios from archaeological organic remains from the Thorsberg peat bog. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 21(9):1541–1545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, P., 1988. Dyes and wools in Iron Age textiles from Norway and Denmark. Journal of Danish Archaeology 7:144–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, P., 1989. Textiles, Cordage and Raw Fibre from 16–22 Coppergate. York: Council for British Archaeology (The Archaeology of York 17/5).Google Scholar
Walton, P. and Eastwood, G., 1983. A Brief Guide to the Cataloguing of Archaeological Textiles. York: Wordplex Wordprocessing Bureau.Google Scholar
Walton Rogers, P., 1997. Textile Production at 16–22 Coppergate. York: Council for British Archaeology (The Archaeology of York 17/11).Google Scholar
Walton Rogers, P., 2007. Cloth and Clothing in Early Anglo-Saxon England AD 450–700. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Wieczorek, A. and Lind, C., eds, 2007. Ursprünge der Seidenstrasse. Stuttgart: Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen.Google Scholar
Wild, J.P., 1970. Textile Manufacture in the Northern Roman Provinces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wild, J. P., Cooke, W.D., Com, C.R. and Fang Lu, L., 1998. Vindolanda: some results of the Leverhulme Trust Programme. In Bender Jørgensen, L. and Rinaldo, C. (eds), Textiles in European Archaeology. Report from the 6th NESAT Symposium, 7-11th May 1996 in Borås: 85–98. Göteborg: Göteborg University, Department of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Willerding, U., 1973. Bronzezeitliche Pflanzenreste aus Iria und Synoro. Tiryns VI (Mainz): 221–240. Mainz: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Wincott Heckett, E. 2003. Viking Age Headcoverings from Dublin. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy (Medieval Dublin Excavations 1962–81 Ser. B. vol. 6).Google Scholar
Østergård, E., 2004. Woven into the Earth. Textiles from Norse Greenland. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar