Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T23:13:58.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Let the Sunshine In: The Issue of Neolithic Longhouse Orientation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2018

Václav Vondrovský
Václav Vondrovský*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is focused on the deliberate orientation of longhouses observed within the wide area of the Linear Pottery culture (LBK) and succeeding cultures (post-LBK). Spatial analysis is based on the assemblage of 1546 buildings, whose purpose it was to attempt to cover the whole area of longhouse distribution. Despite variability, which considerably increased over time, the alignment of house entrances towards the south or south-east was observed. The widely accepted theory of house alignment towards the ‘ancestral homeland’ is therefore challenged by a new hypothesis, which sees orientation governed by the celestial path of the sun. Using 3D-modelling of light-and-shadow and solar impact, sun alignment is discussed as an integral element of the longhouse concept already present by the time of its genesis. The tendency of aligning longhouse entrances towards the east, which emerged during the LBK expansion westwards, is considered to be a regionally limited pattern, as no analogical shift was observed in the eastern areas of longhouse distribution.

Cet article concerne l'orientation délibérément choisie des maisons longues disséminées sur une vaste zone occupée par les communautés du Rubané et du post-Rubané (LBK et post-LBK). Notre analyse se base sur un total de 1546 bâtiments dans le but de saisir l'ensemble de l'aire de distribution de ces maisons. Malgré une certaine diversité, qui augmenta sensiblement avec le temps, on observe un alignement des entrées des maisons vers le sud ou le sud-est. Une nouvelle hypothèse, qui contredit la théorie largement acceptée que l'orientation des maisons s'alignait sur une « terre ancestrale », soutient que l'orientation des maisons suivait la trajectoire du soleil dans le ciel. La modélisation tridimensionnelle de l'ombre et de la lumière et de l'exposition au soleil, nous permet de proposer que l'alignement avec le soleil formait partie intégrale du concept de la maison longue et que cette notion existait déjà au moment de sa genèse. Une tendance à orienter les entrées des maisons vers l'est, qui émergea au cours de l'expansion du Rubané vers l'ouest, semble être un développement régional car il n'existe pas d’évolution semblable dans la zone orientale du Rubané. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Dieser Artikel behandelt die absichtliche Orientierung der Langhäuser, die im größeren Verteilungsgebiet der Linearbandkeramischen Kultur (LBK) und späteren Kulturen (post-LBK) vorkommen. Um diesen ganzen Verteilungsraum zu erfassen, hat unsere räumliche Analyse 1546 Bauten betroffen. Trotz Schwankungen in der Orientierung, die mit der Zeit erheblich zunahmen, sind die Eingänge der Häuser in der Regel nach Süden oder Südosten gerichtet. Die weitgehend angenommene Theorie, dass die Hausorientierung sich nach einer „Urheimat” ausrichtete, wird hier infrage gestellt und eine neue Hypothese vorgeschlagen: dass der Sonnenlauf (oder Sonnenstand) die Ausrichtung der Häuser bestimmt. Die dreidimensionale Modellierung von Schatten und Licht sowie von der Bestrahlungsstärke deutet auf die Ausrichtung zur Sonne als integraler Bestandteil des Langhäuserphänomens, und zwar bereits von Beginn an. Die Orientierung der Hauseingänge nach Osten, die sich im Laufe der westlichen Ausdehnung des LBK Kulturraumes entwickelte, wird als regional begrenzte Erscheinung betrachtet, da es keinen analogen Wandel im östlichen Teil des Verteilungsgebietes der der Langhäuser gab. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

Linear Pottery culturepost-LBKlonghousehouse orientationlight-and-shadow analysissolar impactRubanépost-Rubanémaisons longuesorientation des maisonsanalyse de l'ombre et de la lumièreexposition au soleilLinearbandkeramische Kulturpost-LBK KulturenLanghausHausorientierungSchatten und Licht AnalyseBestrahlungsstärke
Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 528 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A.S. 2016. Church Orientation in the Landscape: A Perspective from Medieval Wales. Archaeological Journal, 173: 154–87.Google Scholar
Bánffy, E. 2013. Tracing the Beginning of Sedentary Life in the Carpathian Basin: The Formation of the LBK House. In: Hofmann, D. & Smyth, J., eds. Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe: Sedentism, Architecture and Practice. New York: Springer, pp. 117–49.Google Scholar
Bánffy, E. & Oross, K. 2010. The Earliest and Earlier Phase of the LBK in Transdanubia. In: Gronenborn, D. & Petrasch, J., eds. The Spread of the Neolithic to Central Europe: International Symposium, Mainz 24 June–26 June 2005. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, pp. 255–72.Google Scholar
Bickle, P. 2013. Of Time and the House: The Early Neolithic Communities of the Paris Basin and Their Domestic Architecture. In: Hofmann, D. & Smyth, J., eds. Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe: Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice. New York: Springer, pp. 151–81.Google Scholar
Boelicke, U., von Brandt, D., Lüning, J., Stehli, P. & Zimmermann, A. 1988. Der bandkeramische Siedlungsplatz Langweiler 8, Gemeinde Aldenhoven, Kreis Düren. Köln: Rheinland.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2001. Orientations and Origins: A Symbolic Dimension to the Long House in Neolithic Europe. Antiquity, 75: 50–56.Google Scholar
Brück, J. 1999. Ritual and Rationality: Some Problems of Interpretation in European Archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology, 2: 313–44.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. & Gaydarska, B. 2007. Parts and Wholes: Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. & Gaydarska, B. 2011. Can We Reconcile Individualisation with Relational Personhood? A Case Study from the Early Neolithic. Documenta Praehistorica, 38: 21–43.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. & Gaydarska, B. 2015. Spondylus gaederopus/Glycymeris Exchange Networks in the European Neolithic and Chalcolithic. In: Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofmann, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 639–56.Google Scholar
Chow, A., Fung, A.S. & Li, S. 2014. GIS Modeling of Solar Neighborhood Potential at a Fine Spatiotemporal Resolution. Buildings, 4: 195–206.Google Scholar
Conolly, J. & Lake, M. 2006. Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coudart, A. 1998. Architecture et société néolithique. L'unité et la variance de la maison néolithique (Documents d'Archéologie Française 67). Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Coudart, A. 2013. The Reconstruction of the Danubian Neolithic House and the Scientific Importance of Architectural Studies. EXARC Journal, 2013/3 [online]. Available at: <https://exarc.net/issue-2013-3/ea/reconstruction-danubian-neolithic-house-and-scientific-importance-architectural-studies> [accessed 17 December 2017].+[accessed+17+December+2017].>Google Scholar
Coudart, A. 2015. The Bandkeramik Longhouses: A Material, Social, and Mental Metaphor for Small-Scale Sedentary Societies. In: Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofmann, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–26.Google Scholar
Czerniak, L. 2016. House and Household in the LBK. In: Amkreutz, L., Haack, F., Hofmann, D. & van Wijk, I., eds. Something Out of the Ordinary? Interpreting Diversity in the Early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik and Beyond. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 33–64.Google Scholar
Einicke, R. 2011. Traditionen in der Orientierung bandkeramischer Häuser in Mitteldeutschland und Brandenburg. In: Beier, H.J., Einicke, R. & Biermann, E., eds. Varia Neolithica VII. Dechsel, Axt, Beil & Co. Werkzeug, Waffe, Kultgegenstand? Beiträge der Tagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Waffen im Archäologischen Zentrum Hitzacker 2010 und Aktuelles. Langenweissbach: Beier & Beran pp. 171–82.Google Scholar
Gibson, K.R. 1999. Social Transmission of Facts and Skills in the Human Species: Neural Mechanisms. In: Box, H.O. & Gibson, K.R., eds. Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 351–66.Google Scholar
González-García, A.C. & Belmonte, J.A. 2015. The Orientation of Pre-Romanesque Churches in the Iberian Peninsula. Nexus Network Journal, 17: 353–77.Google Scholar
Hachem, L. 2000. New Observations on the Bandkeramik House and Social Organization. Antiquity, 74: 308–12.Google Scholar
Hampel, A. 1989. Die Hausentwicklung im Mittelneolithikum Zentraleuropas. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Hauzeur, A. 2006. Houses of the Linear Pottery Culture: Orientation and Use of Landscape in Cultural Context. Case Studies of the Great-Duchy of Luxembourg. In: Guerci, A., Consigliere, S. & Castagno, S., eds. Il processo di umanizzazione. Atti del XVI Congresso degli Antropologi Italiani (Genova, 29–31 ottobre 2005). Milan: Edicolors, pp. 561–70.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D., Pechtl, J., Bentley, R.A., Bickle, P., Fibiger, L., Grupe, G., et al. 2013. Southern Bavaria. In: Bickle, P. & Whittle, A., eds. The First Farmers of Central Europe: Diversity in LBK Lifeways. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 205–48.Google Scholar
Ilett, M., Constantin, C., Coudart, A. & Demoule, J.-P. 1982. The Late Bandkeramik of the Aisne Valley: Environment and Spatial Organisation. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 15: 45–61.Google Scholar
Iwaniszewski, S. 2015. Cultural Interpretation of Archaeological Evidence Relating to Astronomy. In: Ruggles, C.L.N, ed. Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. New York: Springer, pp. 315–24.Google Scholar
Jakucs, J., Bánffy, E., Oross, K., Voicsek, V., Bronk Ramsey, C., Dunbar, E., et al. 2016. Between the Vinča and Linearbandkeramik Worlds: The Diversity of Practices and Identities in the 54th–53rd Centuries cal BC in Southwest Hungary and Beyond. Journal of World Prehistory, 29: 267–336.Google Scholar
Končelová, M. & Květina, P. 2015. Neolithic Longhouse Seen as a Witness of Cultural Change in the Post-LBK. Anthropologie, 53: 431–46.Google Scholar
Květina, P. 2010. The Spatial Analysis of Non-Ceramic Refuse from the Neolithic Site at Bylany, Czech Republic. European Journal of Archaeology, 13: 336–67.Google Scholar
Květina, P. & Pavlů, I. 2007. Neolithic Settlement at Bylany: Essential Database. Prague: Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Last, J. 1998. The Residue of Yesterday's Existence: Settlement Space and Discard at Miskovice and Bylany. In: Pavlů, I., ed. Bylany. Varia 1. Prague: Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar
Lenneis, E. 2013. Reconstruction of Domestic Units from Distribution Analysis and Study of Finds Density in Pit Fills. In: Hamon, C., Allard, P. & Ilett, M., eds. The Domestic Space in LBK Settlements. Rahden: Marie Leidorf, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1981. Environmental Adaptation and Structural Design in Axially-Pitched Longhouses from Neolithic Europe. World Archaeology, 13: 101–21.Google Scholar
Mattheußer, E. 1991. Die geographische Ausrichtung bandkeramischer Häuser (Studien zur Siedlungsarchäologie 1, Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 6). Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
McCluskey, S.C. 2015a. Analysing Light and Shadow Interactions. In: Ruggles, C.L.N., ed. Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. New York: Springer, pp. 427–44.Google Scholar
McCluskey, S.C. 2015b. Orientation of Christian Churches. In: Ruggles, C.L.N., ed. Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. New York: Springer, pp. 1703–10.Google Scholar
Meyer-Christian, W. 1976. Die Y-Pfostenstellung in Häusern der Älteren Linearbandkeramik. Bonner Jahrbücher, 176: 1–25.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R. 1970. Linearbandkeramik aus Elsloo und Stein. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 3: 1–217.Google Scholar
Oross, K. 2010: Architecture of the Linearbandkeramik Settlement at Balatonszárszó-Kiserdei-dűlő in Central Transdanubia. In: Gheorghiu, D., ed. Neolithic and Chalcolithic Archaeology in Eurasia: Building Techniques and Spatial Organisation. Proceedings of the XV World Congress UISPP (Lisbon, 4–9 September 2006) (BAR International Series 2097). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. & Richards, C. 1997. Ordering the World: Perceptions of Architecture, Space and Time. In: Parker Pearson, M. & Richards, C., eds. Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Pásztor, E. & Barna, J.P. 2015. Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age Houses in Central Europe. In: Ruggles, C.L.N., ed. Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. New York: Springer, pp. 1307–16.Google Scholar
Pavlů, I. 2000. Life on a Neolithic Site. Prague: Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Pechtl, J. 2009. Stephansposching und sein Umfeld. Studien zum Altneolithikum im bayerischen Donauraum (unpublished PhD dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Pechtl, J. 2010. Anmerkungen zum Kenntnisstand linienbandkeramischer Hausarchitektur im südöstlichen Bayern und zum Potenzial ihrer typologischen Auswertung. In: Chytráček, M., Gruber, H., Michálek, J., Sandner, R. & Schmotz, K., eds. Fines transire 19. Archäologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ostbayern/West- und Südböhmen/Oberösterreich, 19. Rahden: Marie Leidorf, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
Pope, R.E. 2007. Ritual and the Roundhouse: A Critique of Recent Ideas on Domestic Space in Later British Prehistory. In: Haselgrove, C.C. & Pope, R.E., eds. The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 204–28.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1982. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage.Google Scholar
Rück, O. 2009. New Aspects and Models for Bandkeramik Settlement Research. In: Hoffmann, D. & Bickle, P., eds. Creating Communities: New Advances in Central European Neolithic Research. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 159–85.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C.L.N. 2015. Long-Term Changes in the Appearance of the Sky. In: Ruggles, C.L.N., ed. Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. New York: Springer, pp. 473–82.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E. 1951. Zum Charakter der bandkeramischen Siedlung. Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission, 33: 89–109.Google Scholar
Sather, C. 2006. Posts, Hearths and Thresholds: The Iban Longhouse as a Ritual Structure. In: Fox, J.J., ed. Inside Austronesian Houses: Perspectives on Domestic Designs for Living. Canberra: Australian National University Press, pp. 67–120.Google Scholar
Sielmann, B. 1972. Die frühneolithische Besiedlung Mitteleuropas. In: Schwabedissen, H., ed. Die Anfänge des Neolithikums vom Orient bis Nordeuropa. Teil 5a: Westliches Mitteleuropa. Köln: Böhlau, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Sommer, U. 2001. ‘Hear the Instruction of Thy Father, and Forsake not the Law of Thy Mother’: Change and Persistence in the European Early Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology, 1: 244–70.Google Scholar
Soudský, B. 1969. Étude de la maison néolithique, Slovenská archeológia, 17: 5–96.Google Scholar
Startin, W. 1978. Linear Pottery Culture Houses: Reconstruction and Manpower. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 44: 143–59.Google Scholar
Stäuble, H. 2005. Häuser und absolute Datierung der Ältesten Bandkeramik. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Stäuble, H. & Lüning, J. 1999. Phosphatanalyse in bandkeramischen Häusern. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt, 29: 165–87.Google Scholar
Steklá, M. 1961. Chata kultury s vypíchanou keramikou v Libenicích u Kolína. Památky archeologické, 52: 85–92.Google Scholar
Tringham, R. 1971. Hunters, Fishers and Farmers of Eastern Europe, 6000–3000 bc. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
van de Velde, P. 2007. The Neolithic Houses. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 39: 21–70.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 2011. Grand Narratives and Shorter Stories. In: Hadjikoumis, A., Robinson, E. & Viner, S., eds. The Dynamics of Neolithisation in Europe: Studies in Honour of Andrew Sherratt. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 10–24.Google Scholar
Wolfram, S. 2013. Two Sides of the Coin: Ceramic Taphonomy and Domestic Space in the Linear Pottery Settlements Hanau–Klein-Auheim and Eythra (Germany). In: Hamon, C., Allard, P. & Ilett, M., eds. The Domestic Space in LBK Settlements. Rahden: Marie Leidorf, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
Zotti, G. 2015. Visualization Tools and Techniques. In: Ruggles, C.L.N., ed. Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. New York: Springer, pp. 445–57.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Vondrovský supplementary material

Vondrovský supplementary material 1

Download Vondrovský supplementary material(File)
File 51 KB