Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:26:28.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practice, Process, and Social Change in Third Millennium BC Europe: A View from the Sizandro Valley, Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Katina T. Lillios
Katina T. Lillios*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, The University of Iowa, USA
*
[email: katina-lillios@uiowa.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the shift from the practice of collective burials to individual (or double) burials in western Europe at the end of the Neolithic/Copper Age, around 2500–2000 BC, through the lens of a particular mortuary site—the artificial cave of Bolores (Torres Vedras, Portugal). It suggests that the practices involved in making and using collective burials played an important role in this transformation towards increasing social differentiation. It explores how a focus on materiality at different scales, both temporal and spatial, might contribute new insights into geographically widespread and relatively co-synchronous social change.

Cet article examine le passage de la pratique des sépultures collectives à des sépultures individuelles (ou doubles) en Europe occidentale à la fin du Néolithique/Âge du Cuivre, autour de 2500–2000 BC, par le biais d'un site mortuaire particulier: la caverne artificielle de Bolores (Torres Vedras, Portugal). On suggère que les pratiques menant à la préparation et l'utilisation des sépultures collectives ont joué un rôle important dans cette transformation vers une différenciation sociale croissante. L'article explore comment une focalisation sur la matérialité à des échelles différentes, à la fois temporelle et spatiale, pourrait contribuer à mieux comprendre le changement social largement répandu géographiquement et relativement cosynchrone. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Dieser Beitrag behandelt den Wechsel von der Praxis der Kollektivbestattung zu Einzel- (oder Doppel-) Bestattungen in Westeuropa um 2500–2000 v. Chr., am Ende des Neolithikums/der Kupferzeit, aus dem Blickwinkel eines bestimmten Bestattungsplatzes: der künstlichen Höhle von Bolores (Torres Vedras, Portugal). Es wird gezeigt, dass die Praktiken, die die Anlage und Nutzung von Kollektivbestattungen mit sich brachten, eine bedeutende Rolle in der Entwicklung hin zu einer zunehmenden sozialen Differenzierung spielten. Weiterhin wird untersucht, wie ein Fokus auf der Materialität in verschiedenen Maßstäben—gleichermaßen zeitlich wie auch räumlich—neue Erkenntnisse zu geographisch weit verbreitetem und relativ gleichzeitigen sozialen Wandel beisteuern kann. Traslation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

A partir da visão proporcionada por um sítio em particular—a gruta artificial de Bolores (Torres Vedras, Portugal)—este artigo trata da mudança de costumes funerários—de sepulcros colectivos para tumulações individuais (ou duplas)—ocorrida na Europa ocidental no final do Neolítico/Calcolítico, por volta de 2500–2000 AC. Argumenta-se que as práticas subjacentes à produção e utilização de sepulturas colectivas desempenharam um papel importante em processos de transformação que deram origem a graus mais elevados de diferenciação social. Discute-se como, pondo ênfase na materialidade (a diferentes escalas, tanto no tempo como no espaço), é possível obter novas perspectivas sobre fenómenos de mudança social que afectam vastas áreas geográficas de forma penecontemporânea.

Keywords

mortuary archaeologymultiscalar archaeologysocial changePortugalSpaincollective burialsNeolithicCopper AgeBronze Agearchéologie mortuairearchéologie multiscalairechangement socialPortugalEspagnesépultures collectivesNéolithiqueÂge du CuivreÂge du BronzeBestattungsarchäologiemultiskalare Archäologiesozialer WandelPortugalSpanienKollektivbestattungenNeolithikumKupferzeitKupferzeitBronzezeitarqueologia funerariaarqueologia de multi-escalamudança socialPortugalEspanhaenterramentos colectivosNeolíticoIdade do CobreIdade do Bronze
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , 2015 , pp. 245 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 the European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranda Jiménez, G. 2013. Against Uniformity Cultural Diversity: The ‘Others’ in Argaric Societies. In: Berrocal, M.C., García Sanjuán, L. & Gilman, A., eds. The Prehistory of Iberia: Debating Early Social Stratification and the State. London: Routledge, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belo, A.R., Trindade, L. & da Veiga Ferreira, O. 1961. A gruta da Cova da Moura (Torres Vedras). Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal, 45: 391–418.Google Scholar
Bolender, D.J. ed. 2010. Eventful Archaeologies: New Approaches to Social Transformation in the Archaeological Record. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, N. 2002. New Perspectives on the Bell-Beaker Culture. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 16 (3): 297–314.Google Scholar
Brooks, J.F., DeCorse, C.R.F. & Walker, J. eds. 2008. Small Worlds: Method, Meaning, and Narrative in Microhistory. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Brück, J. 2004. Material Metaphors: The Relational Construction of Identity in Early Bronze Age Burials in Ireland and Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology, 4 (3): 307–33.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 2012. The Negotiation of Place Value in the Landscape. In: Papadopoulos, J.K. & Urton, G., eds. The Construction of Value. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, pp. 66–89.Google Scholar
Dambeck, R., Thiemeyer, H., Herrmann, N., Kalis, A.J., Kunst, M., Lord, A., Rittweger, H., Stika, H.P. & Stobbe, A. 2010. Holozäne Talentwicklung und Landschaftswandel am Rio Sizandro. Geoarchäologische Beiträge zum ‘Projekt Sizandro-Alcabrichel' (Portugal). Madrider Mitteilungen, 51: 9–41.Google Scholar
da Veiga Ferreira, O. 1970. Grutas artificiais da Quinta das Lapas (Torres Vedras). Junta Distrital de Lisboa, Boletim Cultural, 73/ 74: 177–87.Google Scholar
da Veiga Ferreira, O. & Trindade, L. 1955. A necrópole do Cabeço da Arruda (Torres Vedras). Anais da Faculdade de Ciências do Porto, 38 (3): 193–212.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A. & Robb, J. eds. 2000. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F. 2003. The Materiality of Serial Practice. A Microarchaeology of Burial. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. 1990. Zur holozänen Landschaftsentwicklung im Tal des Rio Sizandro (Portugal). Madrider Mitteilungen, 31: 21–33.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. & Schulz, H.D. 1995. Cambio de situación de la línea costera y estratigrafia del holoceno en el Valle del Rio Sizandro/Portugal. In: Kunst, M., ed. Origens, estruturas e relações das culturas calcolíticas da Península Ibérica. Lisbon: Actas das Ias Jornadas Arqueológicas de Torres Vedras, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
Horwath, B., Waterman, A.J., Lillios, K.T. & Irish, J. 2014. Assessing Change in Diet and Biological Affinity between the 4th and 3rd Millennia cal BCE in the Portuguese Estremadura: A Preliminary Dental Comparison of Feteira II and Bolores. HOMO: Journal of Human Comparative Biology, 65: 87–100.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against Materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Janowitz, M.F. & Dallal, D. eds. 2013. Tales of Gotham, Historical Archaeology, Ethnohistory and Microhistory of New York City. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Jordão, P. & Mendes, P. 2006/2007. As grutas artificiais da Estremadura portuguesa: uma leitura crítica das arquitecturas. Arqueologia e História, 58/ 59: 43–78.Google Scholar
Joussaume, R., Laporte, L.L. & Scarre, C. eds. 2006. Origine et développement du mégalithisme de l'ouest de l'Europe/Origin and development of the megalithic monuments of western Europe. Colloque International/International Conference, Bougon, 26–30 October 2002. Bougon: Musée des Tumulus de Bougon.Google Scholar
Kunst, M. 2007. Zambujal (Torres Vedras, Lisboa): Relatório das escavações de 2001. Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia, 10 (1): 95–118.Google Scholar
Kunst, M. & Lutz, N. 2008. Zambujal (Torres Vedras, Portugal). Zur Präzision der absoluten Chronologie durch die Untersuchungen an der vierten Befestigungslinie. Madrider Mitteilungen, 49: 29–63.Google Scholar
Kunst, M. & Trindade, L. 1990. Zur Besiedlungesgeschicte des Sizandrotals: Ergebnisse aus der Küstenforschung. Madrider Mitteilungen, 31: 34–83.Google Scholar
Kunst, M. & Uerpmann, H.-P. 1996. Zambujal (Portugal). Vorbericht über die grabungen 1994. Madrider Mitteilungen, 37: 10–36.Google Scholar
Kunst, M. & Uerpmann, H.-P. 2002. Zambujal (Torres Vedras, Lisboa). Relatório das escavações de 1994 e 1995. Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia, 5: 67–120.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., Waterman, A.J., Artz, J.A. & Josephs, R.L. 2010. The Neolithic-Early Bronze Age Mortuary Rockshelter of Bolóres, Torres Vedras, Portugal: Results from the 2007 and 2008 Excavations. Journal of Field Archaeology, 35 (1): 19–39.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., Artz, J.A., Waterman, A.J., Mack, J., Thomas, J.T., Trindade, L. & Luna, I. in press. The Rock-Cut Tomb of Bolores (Torres Vedras): An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding the Social Landscape of the Late Neolithic of the Iberian Peninsula. Trabajos de Prehistoria. Google Scholar
Lock, G. & Molyneaux, B. eds. 2006. Confronting Scale in Archaeology—Issues of Theory and Practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lord, A., Cabral, M.C., Dambeck, R. & Kunst, M. 2010. Ostracod Evidence for the Neolithic Environment of Rio Sizandro, Portugal. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 91 (3): 1–14.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T.R. 2001. Practice and History in Archaeology. An Emerging Paradigm. Anthropological Theory, 1 (1): 73–98.Google Scholar
Robb, J. & Pauketat, T.R. eds. 2013. Big Histories, Human Lives: Tackling Problems of Scale in Archaeology. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E. & Schubart, H. 1981. Zambujal. Die Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E., Schubart, H. & Trindade, L. 1969. Escavações no castro eneolítico do Zambujal. O Arqueólogo Português, série III, 3: 71–114.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E., Schubart, H. & Trindade, L. 1970. Escavações na fortificação eneolítica do Zambujal. 1968. O Arqueólogo Português, série III, 4: 65–114.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E., Schubart, H. & Trindade, L. 1971. Escavações na fortificação da idade do cobre do Zambujal. Portugal, 1970. O Arqueólogo Português, série III, 5: 51–96.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E., Schubart, H. & Trindade, L. 1974–1977. Escavações na fortificação da idade do cobre do Zambujal. Portugal, 1972–1973. O Arqueólogo Português, IIIa série, 7–9: 125–4.Google Scholar
Shennan, A. 1982. Ideology, Change, and the European Early Bronze Age. In: Hodder, I. ed. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–61.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1986. Interaction and Change in Third Millennium BC Western and Central Europe. In: Renfrew, A.C. & Cherry, J., eds. Peer Polity Interaction and Sociopolitical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–48.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1981. Plough and Pastoralism: Aspects of the Secondary Products Revolution. In: Hodder, I., Isaac, G. & Hammond, N., eds. Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–305.Google Scholar
Spindler, K. 1981. Cova da Moura—Die Besiedlung des Atlantischen Küstengebietes Mittelportugals vom Neolithikum bis an das Ende der Bronzezeit. Madrider Beiträge, Band 7. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Spindler, K. & Gallay, G. 1972. Die Tholos von Pai Mogo, Portugal. Madrider Mitteilungen, 13: 38–108.Google Scholar
Spindler, K. & Trindade, L. 1970. A póvoa eneolitica do Penedo (Torres Vedras). Actas das Ias Jornadas Arqueológicas-Lisboa, 2: 57–191.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 2004. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology. Berg Publishers: Oxford.Google Scholar
Trindade, L. & da Veiga Ferreira, O. 1963. Sepultura pré-histórica de Serra da Vila (T. Vedras). Revista da Guimarães, 73 (1/2): 83–89.Google Scholar
Waterman, A.J. 2012. Marked in Life and Death: Identifying Biological Markers of Social Differentiation in Late Prehistoric Portugal (, University of Iowa).Google Scholar