Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:17:56.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Uncertainties in the Sharing Economy: Opportunities for Social Capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mariana Zuleta Ferrari
Mariana Zuleta Ferrari*
Affiliation:
Tilburg Law School, The Netherlands; University of Milan, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sharing economy phenomenon is expected to expand and grow steadily in the coming years. Yet, this sector lacks solid regulation, which raises concerns about its potential risks. However, users continue to engage in sharing economy practices, as opportunities appear to outweigh the perceived risks. This article argues that it is important to look beyond regulatory frameworks, and unravel the social embeddedness of sharing practices in order to provide complementary approaches to risk analysis. In particular, the focus of this article will be placed on the opportunities for building and deploying social capital in the sharing economy and its fundamental role in the development of new sharing economy practices.

Type
Special Issue on the Risks and Opportunities of the Sharing Economy
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 664 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1- For an in-depth analysis of these sectors, see PWC, The Sharing Economy (Consumer Intelligence Series, 2015)Google Scholar. In addition, see Pierre Goudin, The Cost of Non-Europe in the Sharing Economy: Economic, Social and Legal Challenges and Opportunities, 2016).

2- Ranchordás, Sofia, ‘Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy’ (2015) 16 Minnesota journal of Law, Science & Technology 414 Google Scholar.

3- See Goudin, supra, note 1; PWC, supra, note 1; and European Commission, A European agenda for the collaborative economy (2016).

4- Pettit, Philip, ‘Trust, Reliance and the Internet’ (2004) 26 Analyse & Kritik 108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hardin, Russell, ‘Internet Capital’ (2004) 26 Analyse & Kritik 108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5- Gambetta, Diego, ‘Can We Trust Trust?’ in Gambetta, Diego (ed), Trust: Making and breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Black-well 1988)Google Scholar.

6- Lin, Nan, Social Capital. A theory of Social Structure and Action (Cambridge University Press 2001) 214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7- Rachel Botsman, Defining The Sharing Economy: What Is Collaborative Consumption—And What Isn’t? (2015)

8- Benkler, Yochai, ‘Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production’ (2004) 114 Yale Law Journal 278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9- Botsman, supra, note 7.

10- Ranchordás, supra, note 2.

11- Rachel Botsman, The Sharing Economy Lacks A Shared Definition (2013); Ranchordás, supra, note 2.

12- European Commission, supra, note 1, p. 3. See also footnote n.7 of the same document, in which the EC explains that “the term collaborative economy is often interchangeably used with the term ‘sharing economy’. Collaborative economy is a rapid evolving phenomenon and its definition may evolve accordingly”.

13- Botsman, supra, note 7.

14- Ibid; European Commission, supra, note 1.

15- Botsman, supra, note 7.

16- Ranchordás, supra, note 2; Benkler, supra, note 8.

17- see for instance Deputy Ministers’ Committee on Policy Innovation, Back to the Future - the Sharing Economy, 2015), p. 8PWC 2014) <http://www.pwc.co.uk/issues/megatrends/collisions/sharingeconomy/the-sharingeconomy-sizing-the-revenue-opportunity.html> accessed 25 July 2016.

18- See Katie Finley, ‘Trust in the Sharing Economy: An Exploratory Study’ (MA, The University of Warwick 2013); Ranchordás, supra, note 2.

19- See Phills, James A. Jr., Deiglmeier, Kriss and Miller, Dale T., ’Rediscovering Social Innovation’ (2008) 6 Stanford Social Innovation Review Google Scholar.

20- See for instance Barroso, José Manuel Durão, Speech by President Barroso at the Second Innovation Convention (2014) and European Union, Innovation Union . A pocket guide on a Europe 2020 initiative (Publications Office of the European Union 2013)Google Scholar.

21- See Goudin, supra, note 1 at 7.

22- Ibid; Finley, supra, note 18.

23- Ranchordás, supra, note 2 at 417.

24- Finley, supra, note 18 at 6.

25- Goudin, supra, note 1, p. 8.

26- Erickson, Kristofer and Sørensen, Inge, ‘Regulating the sharing economy’ (2016) 5 Internet Policy Review Google Scholar

27- For further information see point (42) and section 4 of European Commission, Directive 2000/31/EC (2000);

28- Goudin, supra, note 1, p.I133-135.

29- Signes, Adrian Todolí, ‘El impacto de la “Uber economy” en las relaciones laborales: los efectos de las plataformas virtuales en el contrato de trabajo’ (2015) IUSLabor Google Scholar.

30- European Commission, supra, note 13; Ranchordás, supra, note 2; Goudin, supra, note 1.

31- Goudin, supra, note 1 at I133-135.

32- Goudin, supra, note 1, p.I-133.

33- Ranchordás, supra, note 2.

34- Todolí Signes, supra, note 29.

35- Rothstein, Henry, Borraz, Olivier and Huber, Michael, ‘Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk-based governance across Europe’ (2013) Regulation & Governance 215 Google Scholar.

36- Ibid., supra, note 42.

37- See European Commission, supra, note 13 and its supporting analysis which can be downloaded at http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16881 (last accessed 12 July 2016).

38- Goudin, supra, note 1.

39- For further explanation on this and others risks, see ibid. at 26-27.

40- Deputy Ministers’ Committee on Policy Innovation, supra, note 17, and PWC, supra, note 17.

41- Barroso, supra, note 20.

42- Firth, Lucy and Mellor, David, ‘The Impact of Regulation on Innovation’ (1999) European Journal of Law and Economics 199, 203Google Scholar.

43- Ibid, pp. 203-204; North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For further discussion on the importance of the context of motivations see Hamari, Juho, Sjöklint, Mimmi and Ukkonen, Antti, ‘The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption’ (2015) Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology Google Scholar.

44- Finley, supra, note 18, p. 12.

45- Goudin, supra, note 1, p. 171.

46- Ranchordás, supra, note 2.

47- See World Values Survey, http://gss.norc.org/Documents/quex/1998%20GSS-ISSP.pdf, European Social Survey, OECD, ‘Society at a Glance 2011. OECD Social Indicators’ 2011) <http://www’.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/soc_glance-2011-en/00/01/index.html?contentType=%2fns%2fOECDBook%2c%2fns%2fBook%2c%2fns%2fStatisticalPublication&itemld=%2fcontent%2fbook%2fsoc_glance-2011-en&mimeType=text%2fhtml&containerItemId=%2fcontent%2fserial%2f19991290&accessItemIds=&option6=imprint&value6=http%3a%2f%2foecd.metastore.ingenta.com%2fcontent%2fimprint%2foecd>>Google Scholar; accessed 4 August 2016. This question was asked in the Special Eurobarometer 223/Wave 62.2 on Social Capital and 58% of the people replied that you can’t be too careful. the curious observation is that while offline trust is declining, apparently, guided by the growth of sharing economy platforms and the number of users, online trust is not, TNS Opinion & Social, Special Eurobarometer 223/ Wave 62.2, 2005).

48- Hardin, Russell, Trust (Polity 2006) 37sGoogle ScholarPubMed.

49- Fukuyama, Francis, Trust (Free Press Paperbacks 1995) 26 Google Scholar.

50- Uslaner, Eric M., ‘Trust as a Moral Value’ in Castiglione, Dario, van Deth, Jan W. and Wolleb, Guglielmo (eds), The Hanbook of Social Capital (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar.

51- Sztompka, Piotr, Trust, A Sociological Theory (Cambridge University Press 1999) 25 Google Scholar.

52- Uslaner, supra, note 50 at 103.

53- Ibid; in addition, see Hardin, Russell, ‘The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust’ (1992) 14 Analyse & Kritik 152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54- Uslaner, supra, note 50 at103.

55- Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness (Russell Sage Foundation 2002), p. 1; Hardin, supra, note 53.

56- Ibid; Hardin, supra, note 4; Hardin, supra, note 53.

57- Uslaner, supra, note 50 at 102.

58- Hardin, supra, note 53.

59- Sztompka, supra, note 51, ch1. See also North, supra, note 43.

60- Stickel, Darryl, Mayer, Roger C. and Sitkin, Sim B., ‘Understanding Social Capital: in Whom do we Trust?’ in Bartkus, Ona Viva and Davis, James H. (eds), Social capital Reaching Out, reaching In (Edward Elgar 2009)Google Scholar; Gambetta, supra, note 5; Pettit, Philip, ‘The Cunning of Trust’ (1995) 24 Philosophy and Public Affairs 202Google Scholar.

61- See Hardin, supra, note 60.

62- Gambetta, supra, note 5 at 218-219.

63- Ibid.

64- Ibid; see also Hardin, supra, note 4.

65- Hardin, supra, note 55 p. 37.

66- Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: towards a new modernity (Sage Publications 1992)Google Scholar; Beck, Ulrich, World Risk Society (Polity Press 1999)Google Scholar; Adam, Barbara, Beck, Ulrich and van Loon, Joost (eds), The Risk Society and Beyond (Sage Publications 2000)Google Scholar; de Giorgi, Raffaelle, ‘The risk of risk society and the limits of law’ (2009) Sociologia del Diritto 59 Google Scholar; Febbrajo, Alberto, ‘For a socio legal theory of risk’ (2009) XXXVI Sociologia del Diritto 2 Google Scholar.

67- Burt, Ronald S., ‘Network duality of social capital’ in Bartkus, Viva Ona and Davis, James H. (eds), Social capital Reaching Out, reaching In (Edward Elgar 2009) 39–40 Google Scholar.

68- Hardin, supra, note 55 at 37.

69- Goudin, supra, note 1, p.I91.

70- In this sense, for instance the EU underlines the importance of these building online trust mechanisms and encourages their improvement to foster a more “confident participation in the collaborative economy”, European Commission, supra, note 13, pp. 10-11.

71- Belk, Russell, “You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online” (2014) Journal of Business Research at 1598 Google Scholar.

72- Pettit, supra, note 4; Hardin, supra, note 4.; see also Taddeo, Mariarosaria and Floridi, Luciano, ‘The case for e-trus’ (2011) 13 Ethics and Information Technology which also introduces a special issue on e-trust Google Scholar.

73- Hardin, supra, note 4.

74- Ferrari, Mariana Zuleta, Trust in Legal Institutions: An Empirical Approach from a Social Capital Perspective (forthcoming 2016)Google Scholar.

75- Serageldin, Ismail, ‘Sustainability as Opportunity and the Problem of Social Capital’ (1996) 3 Brown Journal of World Affairs 196 Google Scholar.

76- See for instance Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail (eds), Social Capital. A Multifaceted Perspective (The World Bank 2000)Google Scholar; Bartkus, Viva Ona and Davis, James H., Social Capital: Reaching Out, Reaching in (Edward Elgar 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77- High levels of social capital have been associated with the improvement of children’s welfare, education, safety, economic prosperity, public health, individual well-being, confidence on institutions and democracy.

78- Bertilsson, Thora Margareta and Hjorth-Andersen, Christian, ‘The Nordic welfare state’ in Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard and Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase (eds), Handbook of Social Capital The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics (Edward Elgar 2009), p. 220 Google Scholar.

79- Stickel, Mayer and Sitkin, supra, note 60 at 304.

80- Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘The forms of social capital’ in Richardson, John G. (ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Greenwood Press 1986)Google Scholar.

81- Coleman, James S., Foundations of Social Theory (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1990) 302 Google Scholar.

82- Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Rafaella Y., Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy (Princeton University Press 1993), p. 167 Google Scholar.

83- Grootaert, Christiaan and van Bastelaer, Thierry, ‘Social Capital: From Definition to Measurement’ in Grootaert, Christiaan and van Bastelaer, Thierry (eds), Understanding and Measuring Social Capital A Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners (World Bank 2002) 3–4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84- Ibid, p. 4.

85- See for instance North, supra, note 43. The author explains that individuals are not only moved by an utilitarian or wealthmaximizing behavior, but also out of altruism and internal norms. In addition, the choices are made based on subjective cognitive aspects based on incomplete information on the environment.

86- Coleman, supra, note 81, p. 305.

87- Cfr. Ostrom, Elinor and Ahn, T. K., ‘The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action’ in Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard and Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase (eds), Handbook of Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics (Edward Elgar 2009) 27 Google Scholar.

88- Ibid. at 28.

89- Coleman, supra, note 81 at 304.

90- Serageldin, Ismail and Grootaert, Christiaan, ‘Defining Social Capital: An Integrating View’ in Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail (eds), Social Capital A Multifaceted Perspective (The World Bank 2000) 40–44 Google Scholar.

91- Sabatini, Fabio, ‘The labour market’ in Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard and Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase (eds), Handbook of Social Capital The Troika of Sociology (Edward Elgar 2009) 272–275 Google Scholar.

92- Putnam, Robert D., Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster 2000) 22 Google Scholar.

93- Ibid. He attributes coining these labels to Gittel, Ross and Vidal, Avis in Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1998), 8 Google Scholar.

94- de Souza Briggs, Xavier, ‘Social Capital and the Cities: Advice to Change Agents’ (International Workshop on Community Building)Google Scholar.

95- Sabatini, supra, note 91 at 272-275.

96- Field, John, Social Capital (Routledge 2003) 32 Google Scholar.

97- Coleman, James S., ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’ (1988) 94 The American Journal of Sociology 106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coleman, supra, note 81 at 318.

98- Sara|Muchnick, The Social Benefits of Renting Out a Room on Airbnb (2015). Other expressions refer to social capital as “the glue that holds societies together” Serageldin, supra, note 75, p. 196, or “the grease that makes different areas of life work well”, De Souza Briggs, supra, note 101 at 1.

99- Lin, supra, note 6, p. 217.

100- Ibid.

101- Jordan, Bill, ‘Social Capital and Welfare Policy’ in Castiglione, Dario, van Deth, Jan W. and Wolleb, Guglielmo (eds), The Handbook of Social Capital (Oxford University Press 2008) 656 Google Scholar.

102- Lin, supra, note 6 at 217.

103- Serageldin and Grootaert, supra, note 90 at 46.

104- Anderson, Alistair, Park, John and Jack, Sarah, ‘Entrepeneurial Social Capital’ (2007) 25 international Small Business journal 245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

105- Albinsson, Pia A. and Perera, B. Yasanthi, ‘Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events’ (2012) 11 journal of Consumer Behavior 309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106- Schor, Juliet, ‘Debating the Sharing Economy’ <http://www.greattransition.org/publication/debating-the-sharingeconomy> accessed 24 July 2016, p. 8 +accessed+24+July+2016,+p.+8>Google Scholar.

107- See Goudin, supra, note 1, pp.I76-77 and Molly Cohen and Corey Zehngebot, ‘Heads up’ (2014) 58 Boston Bar Journal.

108- This could be the case of local closed facebook groups, such as “CHEAP 2 CHEAP (reloaded)”, “CHEAP 2 CHEAP TIPS” and “CHEAP 2 CHEAP 2 ZN”.

109- Portes, Alejandro, ‘Social Capital: its origins and applications in Modern Sociology’ (1998) 24 Annual Review Sociology, p. 10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

110- See ibid for examples.

111- Belk, Russell, ‘Sharing’ (2010) 36 Journal of Consumer Research 715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112- Schor, supra, note 106, p. 8.

113- De Giorgi, supra, note 66.

114- Putnam, supra, note 92, p. 288.

115- Ibid.

116- Portes, supra, note 109, p. 12.

117- Ibid, p13. Portes atributes the coining of this term to Mark Granovetter in Mark Granovetter, 1974 (Harvard University Press Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers).

118- Putnam, supra, note 92.

119- See for instance Muchnick, supra, note 98: the author describes how interaction with strangers renting through Airbnb makes participants happier. First, due to the fact that when meeting a stranger one tends to smile and make eye contact at the first encounter. Secondly, sometimes, sharing accommodation provides the opportunity to share more than this and give space for forging relationships.

120- Belk, supra, note 71, p. 1597.

121- Albinsson and Perera, supra, note 105, p. 308.

122- Belk, supra, note 111, p. 717.

123- Ranchordás, supra, note 2 at 416.

124- Belk, supra, note 71 at 1599.

125- Belk, supra, note 111 at 717.

126- Ibid, p. 717.

127- Ibid, p. 727.

128- Uphoff, Norman, ‘Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation’ in Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail (eds), Social Capital A Multifaceted Perspective (World Bank 2000) 219–221 Google Scholar.

129- Ibid.

130- Belk, supra, note 71.

131- Ibid.at 1596.

132- Ibid, p. 1596.

133- Ranchordás, supra, note 2.

134- Schor, supra, note 106.

135- For instance, see Muchnick, supra, note 98.

136- Belk, supra, note 111 at 716.

137- See the administrative and preparatory documents for transforming Milan into a sharing city: “Milano Comune di Milano, ‘Milano Smart City’ <http://www.milanosmartcity.org/> accessed 12 October 2016.

138- Belk, supra, note 111 at 730.

139- Schor, supra, note 106, p. 11.

140- See Lin, supra, note 6.

141- See for instance Schor, supra, note 105.

142- Albinsson and Perera, supra, note 113 at 312.

143- Botsman, Rachel, ‘The Changing Rules of Trust in the Digital Age’ Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2015/10/the-changing-rules-of-trust-in-the-digital-age, accessed October 20, 2015 Google Scholar. See also Botsman, supra, note 11 and Rachel Botsman, ‘The currency of the new economy is trust’ June 2012) <https://www.ted.com/ talks/rachel_botsman_the_currency_of_the_new_economy_is _trust?language=en> accessed 10 October 2016.