Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-10T05:24:44.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulating Nanotechnologies by Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

André Gazsó ,
Christiane Hauser  and
Mario Kaiser
André Gazsó
Affiliation:
Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria. Please send inquiries to agazso@oeaw.ac.at
Christiane Hauser
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Mario Kaiser
Affiliation:
Science Studies, University of Basel, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reports
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 103 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 European Commission, Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology (COM(2004)338), 2004.

2 European Commission, Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: An action plan for Europe, 2005-2009 (COM(2005)243), 2005.

3 Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Nano-Initiative – Action Plan 2010, Bonn, 2007.

4 Federal Office of Public Health FOPH, State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO, Federal Office for the Environment FOEN, Action Plan – Synthetic Nanomaterials, 2008.

5 Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management et al., Austrian Nanotechnology Action Plan, 2010.

6 BMBF, Aktionsplan Nanotechnologie 2015 (Bonn, Berlin 2010).

7 Irwin, Alan, “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance”, 36(2) Social Studies of Science (2006), pp. 299–320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Rowe, Gene and Frewer, Lynn J., “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms”, 30(2) Science, Technology, & Human Values (2005), pp. 251–290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Wilsdon, James and Willis, Rebecca, See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream (London: Demos, 2004)Google Scholar.

10 Ortwin Renn and Mike Roco, “White Paper on Nanotechnology – Risk Governance”, International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, available on the Internet at <http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_white_paper_2_PDF_final_version-2.pdf> (last accessed on 16 January 2012).

11 ETC Group, “The Big Down: From Genomes to Atoms”, January 2003, available on the Internet at <http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/171/01/thebigdown.pdf> (last accessed on 16 January 2012).

12 The Royal Society & Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and nanotechnlogies: opportunities and uncertainties, Report of 29 July 2004, available on the Internet at <http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm> (last accessed on 16 January 2012).

13 Rip, Arie and van Amerom, Marloes, “Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lockouts, and Lock-Ins” in Kaiser, Mario, Kurath, Monika, Maasen, Sabine and Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph (eds.), Governing future technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime (Dordrecht: Springer, 2010)Google Scholar.

14 Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter (1992), “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government”, 43(2) The British Journal of Sociology (1992), pp. 173–205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Habermas, Jürgen, Moral consciousness and communicative action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)Google Scholar.