Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:10:21.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulatory Impact Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lorenzo Allio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This section regularly examines Regulatory Impact Assessment (IA) at three levels: the EU, the Member States and internationally. Contributions aim to cover aspects such as the interface between IA and risk analysis, looking at methodologies as well as legal and political science-related issues. Contributions are meant to report and critically assess recent developments in the field, develop strategic thinking, and make constructive recommendations for improving performance in IA processes.

Type
Reports
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 76 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 European Commission (2002a), Communication on European Governance: Better Lawmaking, COM(2002) 275 final of 5 June 2002.

2 European Commission (2000), White Paper on Reforming the Commission – Part I and II (Action Plan), COM(2000) 200 final of 1 March 2000 (as amended by COM(2000) 200 final/2 of 5 April 2000).

3 European Commission (2005), Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, COM(2005) 97 final of 16 March 2005.

4 See http://ec.europa.eu/governance/better_regulation/simplification_en.htm (last accessed on 3 February 2010).

5 See http://ec.europa.eu/governance/better_regulation/admin_costs_en.htm (last accessed on 3 February 2010).

6 Allio, L., The Emergence of Better Regulation in the European Union, King's College London, London 2009.

7 See http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=760&langId=en&preview=cHJldmlld0VtcGxQb3J0YWwh (last accessed on 3 February 2010).

8 European Commission (2009a), Impact Assessment Guidelines, SEC(2009) 92 of 15 January 2009.

9 Kassim, H., “The Secretariat General of the European Commission, 1958–2003. A singular institution”, in Smith, A. (ed.), Politics and the European Commission. Actors, Interdependence, Legitimacy, 2004, pp.47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 See http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/better-regulation/administrative-burdens/high-level-group/index_en.htm (last accessed on 3 February 2010).

11 De facto, however, the Stoiber Group currently does not have a budget of its own, its secretariat sits within the Commission’s SecGen, and it is not entitled to determine its own agenda (which proposals to review).

12 European Commission (2002b), “Improving the Knowledge Base for Better Policies.” Communication on the Collection and Use of Expertise by the Commission: Principles and Guidelines, COM(2002) 713 final of 11 December 2002.

13 European Commission (2008), Decision 2008/721/EC of 5 August 2008 setting up an advisory structure of Scientific Committees and experts in the field of consumer safety, public health and the environment and repealing Decision 2004/210/EC, in OJ L 241 of 10 September 2008, pp.21–30.

14 See OJ C 321 of 31 December 2003, p. 1.

15 Meuwese, A.C.M., Impact Assessment in EU Lawmaking (Kluwer Law International 2008), The Hague Google Scholar.

16 Radaelli, C.M., “Diffusion without convergence: How political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment”, in Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.12/5, 2005, pp.924–943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Radaelli, C.M., “Desperately seeking Regulatory Impact Assessment: Diary of a reflective researcher”, in Evaluation, Vol.15/1, 2009, pp.31–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 OECD (2009), Indicators of Regulatory Management Systems. 2009 Report, Paris.

18 The OECD, in partnership with the European Commission, is carrying out a project reviewing regulatory reform in fifteen EU Member States. For more information, see http://www.oecd.org/document/24/0,3343,en_2649_34141_41909720_1_1_1_37421,00.html (last accessed on 3 February 2010).

19 See http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/09/400&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en (last accessed on 3 February 2010); and President Barroso's Political Guidelines for the Next Commission, 2009.

20 Wiener, J.B./Alemanno, A., “Comparing regulatory oversight bodies across the Atlantic: US OMB/OIRA and the EU IAB”, in Rose-Ackerman, S./Lindseth, P.L. (eds), Comparative Administrative Law (Yale University Press 2010).

21 Obama B., Memorandum of January 30, 2009 – Regulatory Review, 74 Fed. Reg. 5977 (published on 3 February 2009).

22 Wiener, J.B., Better Regulation in Europe, Paper 06-26, AEIBrookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington D.C., 2006.

23 See http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/1272&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=fr (last accessed on 3 February 2010).

24 Ideas and proposals for contributions may be forwarded to Alberto Alemanno () and Lorenzo Allio ().