Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T19:26:15.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contesting Europe: the constitutive impact of discursive dynamics on national referendum campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2010

Stefan Seidendorf
Stefan Seidendorf*
Affiliation:
Deutsch-Französisches Institut, Asperger Straße 34 D–71634 Ludwigsburg, Germany
*
* E-mail: seidendorf@dfi.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A comparison of two referendum campaigns on Europe in France and Ireland shows two different patterns of mobilisation. Focusing on the perceived influence of the European treaties on national legislation on abortion, two different types of Euro-scepticism can be discerned. One is settled in a potentially universal project of ‘enlightenment’ (fearing the ‘criminalisation’ of abortion due to EU (European Union) regulations), the other is concerned with the defence of the nation’s democratic sovereignty against the EU (and fears ‘liberalisation’ of abortion due to the same EU regulations). A discourse analysis of these two different settings establishes the ‘discursive dynamics’ of each campaign: How were actors constituted (into ‘legitimate’ actors) and how could the (differing) interpretations of EU treaty provisions become plausible and constitute into different national discourses? Instead of perceiving social variables (norms, rules, identities) as ‘independent’ factors that explain outcomes, the social process of their constitution is at the centre of this analysis. Understanding how and when certain actors and certain topics (or problematiques) come into being (are ‘constituted’) may, in turn, allow some ‘reasoned claims’ on the character of popular Euro-scepticism.

Keywords

constructivismdiscourse analysisEuro-scepticismconstitutionalisationreferendum
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 423 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartolini, S., Hix, S. (2006), ‘Politics: the right or wrong sort of medicine for the EU’. Notre Europe: policy-paper, [online] No. 19’. Retrieved 2 October 2009 from http://www.notre-europe.eu/uploads/tx_publication/Policypaper19-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cederman, L.E.Daase, C. (2003), ‘Endogenizing corporate identities: the next step in constructivist IR theory’, European Journal of International Relations 9(1): 5–35.Google Scholar
Checkel, J.T. (2007), ‘Constructivism and EU politics’, in E.K. Joergensen, M.A. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds), Handbook of European Union politics, London: Sage, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., Vauchez, A. (2008), ‘Back to the ‘future of Europe’: A political sociology of EU constitutional saga’. EUI Working Papers RSCAS, 2008/33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, T. (1995), Neues Europa, altes Modell: die Konstruktion von Staatlichkeit im politischen Diskurs zur Zukunft der europäischen Gemeinschaft, Frankfurt/M., Germany: Haag und Herchen.Google Scholar
Diez, T. (2001), ‘Europe as a discursive battleground: discourse analysis and European integration studies’, Cooperation and Conflict 36(1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksen, E.O. (ed.) (2005), Making the European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the EU, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
European Union (Publications Office) (2007), ‘Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, Official Journal of the European Union 50(C 303): 1–17.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.Wodak, R. (1997), ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (Discourse Studies 2: a Multidisciplinary Introduction), London: Sage, pp. 258–284.Google Scholar
Fossum, J.E., Trenz, H.J. (2006), ‘When the people come in: constitution-making and the belated politicisation of the European Union’. European Governance Papers (EUROGOV), [online]. C-06-03. Retrieved 8 October 2009 from: http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-06-03.pdfGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997) [1969], Archäologie des Wissens, Frankfurt/M., Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1998), Die Ordnung des Diskurses: Inauguralvorlesung am Collège de France, 2. Dezember 1970, Frankfurt/M., Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar
Fouetillou, G. (2007), ‘Le web et le débat sur la constitution européenne en France [online] Observatoire présidentielle’. Retrieved 20 May 2009 from http://www.observatoire-presidentielle.fr/?pageid=20Google Scholar
Guzzini, S. (2000), ‘A reconstruction of constructivism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, J. (2001), Irish media: a critical history since 1922, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudemann, R.Soutou, G.H. (eds) (1994), Eliten in Deutschland und Frankreich im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert: Strukturen und Beziehungen/ Elites en France et en Allemagne aux XIXe et XXe siècles: structures et relations, München, Germany: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Irish Bishops’ Conference (2008), Fostering a community of values: pastoral reflection from the catholic bishops of Ireland on the occasion of the referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon [online]. Retrieved 21 December 2009 from http://www.catholicbishops.ie/images/stories/Google Scholar
Kerchner, B. (2006), ‘Diskursanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft: ein Forschungsüberblick’, in B. Kerchner and S. Schneider (eds), Foucault: Diskursanalyse der Politik: eine Einführung, Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, pp. 33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F.Ruggie, J.G. (1986), ‘International organization: a state of the art on an art of the state’, International Organization 40(4): 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzyzanowski, M.Oberhuber, F. (2007), (Un)doing Europe: Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution, Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Larsen, H. (1997), Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liebert, U. (2007), ‘Introduction: structuring political conflict about Europe: national media in transnational discourse analysis’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 8(3): 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebert, U., Trenz, H.J. (2008), Mass media and contested meanings: EU constitutional politics after popular rejection. EUI Working Papers RSCAS, 2008/28.Google Scholar
Maatsch, S. (2007), ‘The struggle to control the meanings: the French debate on the European Constitution in mass media’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 8(3): 261–280.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (2005), Dilemmas of European Integration: the Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, G.Steenbergen, M.R. (eds) (2004), European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mischi, J.Streith, M. (2004), ‘L’implantation du PCF: bastions ruraux, bastions urbains’, Études rurales 171–172(3–4): 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2006), ‘What can we learn from the collapse of the European Constitution project?’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS) 47(2): 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. (2005), The Idea of a European Superstate: Public Justification and European Integration, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, I.B. (2008), ‘Returning practice to the linguistic turn: the case of diplomacy’, in H. Bauer and E. Brighi (eds), Pragmatism in International Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 82–102.Google Scholar
Perrineau, P. (2005), ‘Introduction’, Les cahiers du Cevipof 42: 2–6.Google Scholar
Piar, C.Gerstlé, J. (2005), ‘Le cadrage du référendum sur la Constitution Européenne: la dynamique d’une campagne à rebondissements’, Les cahiers du Cevipof 42: 42–71.Google Scholar
Rytövuori-Apunen, H. (2005), ‘Forget ‘post-positivist’ IR: the legacy of IR theory as the locus for a pragmatist turn’, Cooperation and Conflict 40(2): 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. (2000), ‘Wendt’s world’, Review of International Studies 26(1): 121–153.Google Scholar
Titscher, S., Wodak, R., Meyer, M.Vetter, E. (2000), Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wendt, A.E. (1987), ‘The agent-structure problem in International Relations theory’, International Organization 41(3): 335–370.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R.Reisigl, M. (eds) (1998), Zur diskursiven Konstruktion nationaler Identität, Frankfurt/M., Germany: Suhrkamp. Translated into English, 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Wodak, R.Meyer, M. (2005), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage.Google Scholar