Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T12:50:54.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The private consequences of public policies: active labor market policies and social ties in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Christopher J. Anderson
Christopher J. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
* E-mail: christopher.anderson@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Though comparative political economists have examined active labor market policies (ALMPs) by focusing narrowly on how they affect economic outcomes, this paper develops and argues for a broadened conception of how such policies can shape a variety of outcomes beyond the labor market. In particular, I argue that ALMPs have the potential to shape the quality of people’s private lives by enhancing their opportunities and motives to interact with social others. Analyses of data collected in 17 European countries show that individuals in countries with higher spending on ALMPs report more frequent social interactions and a reduced sense of social exclusion. Moreover, I find that the positive influence of labor market policies on social ties is stronger among individuals whose labor market position is more precarious. The results suggest that public policies have important and multifaceted consequences for people’s private lives and countries’ patterns of social cohesion.

Keywords

labor market policieswelfare statesEuropean politicssocial tiessocial cohesionpolicy feedback
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 341 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C.J.Pontusson, J. (2007), ‘Workers, worries, and welfare states: social protection and job insecurity in 15 OECD countries’, European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, E.W. (1933), The Unemployed Man: A Social Study, London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
Barrera, M. (1986), ‘Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models’, American Journal of Community Psychology 14(4): 413–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002), ‘Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: concept and measurement’, Social Indicators Research 58(1–3): 403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (1998), Political Parties, Growth and Equality, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, D.H.Stephens, J.D. (2007), ‘Employment performance in OECD countries: a test of neoliberal and institutionalist hypotheses’, Comparative Political Studies 40(12): 1486–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, M.H. (1973), Mental Illness and the Economy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. (1994), ‘Active labour market policy and unemployment: a framework for the analysis of crucial design features’, OECD Economic Studies 22(1): 7–47.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. (1995), ‘Labour market policy and unemployment’, European Economic Review 39(3–4): 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L.Forslund, A. (1991), ‘Real-wage determination and labour market policies: the Swedish experience’, Economic Journal 101(408): 1130–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L., Forslund, A.Hemström, M. (2004), ‘The effects of active labour market policies in Sweden: what is the evidence?’, in J. Agell, M.J. Keen and A.J. Weichenreider (eds), Labor Market Institutions and Public Regulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L.Skedinger, P. (1995), ‘Does active labour market policy increase employment? Theoretical considerations and some empirical evidence from Sweden’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 11(1): 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.L. (2003), How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.L. (2008), ‘Policy Feedbacks and the Political Mobilization of Mass Publics’. Unpublished MS, Department of Political Science, M.I.T.Google Scholar
Carling, K.Richardson, K. (2004), ‘The relative efficiency of labor market programs: Swedish experience from the 1990s’, Labour Economics 11(3): 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A.E.Oswald, A.J. (1994), ‘Unhappiness and unemployment’, Economic Journal 104(424): 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darity, W.Goldsmith, A.H. (1996), ‘Social psychology, unemployment and macroeconomics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, T.J.Kiefer, N.M. (1991), Empirical Labor Economics: The Search Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVroey, M. (2004), Involuntary Unemployment: The Elusive Quest for a Theory, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E.F. (2000), ‘Subjective wellbeing: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index’, American Psychologist 55(1): 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E.Oishi, S. (2005), ‘The nonobvious social psychology of happiness’, Psychological Inquiry 16(4): 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E.F., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E.Smith, H.L. (1999), ‘Subjective wellbeing: three decades of progress’, Psychological Bulletin 125(2): 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingeldey, I. (2007), ‘Between workfare and enablement – the different paths to transformation of the welfare state: a comparative analysis of activating labour market policies’, European Journal of Political Research 46(6): 823–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbes, P., Böckenholt, U.Wedel, M. (2004), ‘Regressor and random-effects dependencies in multilevel models’, Statistica Neerlandica 58(2): 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, P.Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1938), ‘The psychological effects of unemployment’, Psychological Bulletin 35(6): 358–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmeskov, J., Martin, J.P.Scarpetta, S. (1998), ‘Key lessons for labour market reforms: evidence from oecd countries’ experiences’, Swedish Economic Policy Review 5(2): 205–252.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2005), European Social Statistics: Labour Market Policy – Expenditure and Participants – Data 2003, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N.E. (2004), ‘Social cohesion’, Annual Review of Sociology 30: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G.Lange, P. (1991), ‘Political responses to interdependence’, International Organization 45(4): 539–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, A.H., Veum, J.R.Darity, W. (1996), ‘The impact of labor force history on self-esteem and its component parts, anxiety, alienation, and depression’, Journal of Economic Psychology 17(2): 183–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, E.Jackson, J. (1977), Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.A.Taylor, W.E. (1981), ‘Panel data and unobservable individual effects’, Econometrica 49(6): 1377–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J.J., LaLonde, R.J.Smith, J.A. (1999), ‘The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs’, in O. Ashenfelter and D.E. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. III, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
House, J.S., Umberson, D.Landis, K.R. (1988), ‘Structures and processes of social support’, Annual Review of Sociology 14: 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, R. (1994), ‘What can active labour market policy do?’, Swedish Economic Policy Review 1(1–2): 221–257.Google Scholar
Jackman, R., Pissarides, C.Savouri, S. (1990), ‘Labour market policies and unemployment in the OECD’, Economic Policy 5(2): 449–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T.Soskice, D. (2006a), ‘New macroeconomics and political science’, Annual Review of Political Science 9: 425–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T.Soskice, D. (2006b), ‘Electoral systems and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others’, American Political Science Review 100(2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1982), Employment and Unemployment: A Socio-Psychological Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janoski, T. (1990), The Political Economy of Unemployment, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Janoski, T. (1994), ‘Direct state intervention in the labor market’, in T. Janoski and A. Hicks (eds), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowell, R., the Central Co-ordinating Team (2003), European Social Survey 2002/2003: Technical Report, London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University. Retrieved from http://ess.nsd.uib.no/Google Scholar
Jusko, K.L.Shively, W.P. (2005), ‘Applying a two-step strategy to the analysis of cross-national public opinion data’, Political Analysis 13(4): 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.-S.Frees, E.W. (2007), ‘Multilevel modeling with correlated effects’, Psychometrika 72(4): 505–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. (1995), Actively Seeking Work? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kluve, J., Card, D., Fertig, M., Góra, M., Jacobi, L., Jensen, P., Leetmaa, R., Nima, L., Patacchini, E., Schaffner, S., Schmidt, C.M., van der Klaauw, B.Weber, A. (2007), Active Labor Market Policies in Europe: Performance and Perspectives, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluve, J.Schmidt, C.M. (2002), ‘Can Training and Employment Subsidies Combat European Unemployment?’, Economic Policy 17(35): 409–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, T. (1997), ‘Is utility related to employment status? Employment, unemployment, labor market policies and subjective wellbeing among Swedish youth’, Labour Economics 4(2): 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, S. (2004), The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, S.Rothstein, B. (2005), ‘Making and breaking social capital: the impact of welfare state institutions’, Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R., Nickell, S.Jackman, R. (1991), Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacFadyen, A., MacFadyen, H.Prince, N. (1996), ‘Economic stress and psychological well-being: an economic psychology framework’, Journal of Economic Psychology 17(3): 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, S.Manning, A. (1999), ‘The causes and consequences of longterm unemployment in Europe’, in O. Ashenfelter and D.E. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. III, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Marsden, P.V. (1987), ‘Core discussion networks of Americans’, American Sociological Review 52(1): 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.P. (2000), ‘What works among active labour market policies: evidence from OECD countries’ experiences’, OECD Economic Studies 30(I): 79–113.Google Scholar
Martin, C.J.Swank, D. (2004), ‘Does the organization of capital matter?’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L.Brashears, M.E. (2006), ‘Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades’, American Sociological Review 71(3): 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, S.B. (2002), ‘Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: policy feedback effects of the GI bill for World War II veterans’, American Political Science Review 96(2): 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, S.B.Soss, J. (2004), ‘The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: bridging policy studies and mass politics’, Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, S. (1997), ‘Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, S.Layard, R. (1999), ‘Labor market institutions and economic performance’, in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2003), OECD Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. (1986), ‘The economic theory of trade unions: an introductory survey’, in L. Calmfors and H. Horn (eds), Trade Unions, Wage Formation, and Macroeconomic Stability, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. (1978), The Politics of Buraucracy, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pierre, G. (1999), ‘A Framework for active labour market policy evaluation’. Employment and Training Papers No. 49. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993), ‘When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change’, World Politics 45(4): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilisuk, M.Minkler, M. (1985), ‘Supportive ties: a political economy perspective’, Health Education and Behavior 12(1): 93–106.Google ScholarPubMed
Putnam, R.D. (2007), ‘E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century – the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture’, Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2): 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaum, O., Torp, H., Zhang, T. (2002), ‘Do individual programme effects exceed the costs? Norwegian evidence on long run effects of labour market training’, University of Oslo, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B.Uslaner, E.M. (2005), ‘All for all: equality, corruption, and social trust’, World Politics 58(1): 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, D. (2005), ‘Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, D. (2007), Social Democracy Inside Out: Government Partisanship, Insiders, and Outsiders in Industrialized Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarpetta, S. (1996), ‘Assessing the role of labour market policies and institutional settings on unemployment: a cross-country study’, OECD Economic Studies 26(2): 43–98.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1997), ‘Inequality, unemployment, and contemporary Europe’, International Labour Review 136(2): 155–171.Google Scholar
Snijders, T.A.B.Bosker, R. (1999), Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Soss, J. (1999), ‘Lessons of welfare: policy design, political learning, and political action’, American Political Science Review 93(2): 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (2006), The Moral Economy of Class: Class and Attitudes in Comparative Perspective, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverke, M.Hellgren, J. (2002), ‘The nature of job insecurity: understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium’, Applied Psychology 51(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, D.Martin, C.J. (2000), ‘Employers and the welfare state’, Comparative Political Studies 34(8): 889–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J.B. (1995), ‘Economic context and the health effects of unemployment’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36(3): 213–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, S.C. (2003), ‘Implementation’, in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Handbook of Public Administration, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar