Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:15:23.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the Quality of Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2011

Bo Rothstein ,
Marcus Samanni  and
Jan Teorell
Bo Rothstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Marcus Samanni
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Jan Teorell
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
*
* E-mail: Bo.Rothstein@pol.gu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hitherto most successful theory explaining why similar industrialized market economies have developed such varying systems for social protection is the Power Resource Theory (PRT), according to which the generosity of the welfare state is a function of working class mobilization. In this paper, we argue that there is an under-theorized link in the micro-foundations for PRT, namely why wage earners trying to cope with social risks and demand for redistribution would turn to the state for a solution. Our approach, the Quality of Government (QoG) theory, stresses the importance of trustworthy, impartial, and uncorrupted government institutions as a precondition for citizens’ willingness to support policies for social insurance. Drawing on data on 18 OECD countries during 1984–2000, we find (a) that QoG positively affects the size and generosity of the welfare state, and (b) that the effect of working class mobilization on welfare state generosity increases with the level of QoG.

Keywords

good governancecorruptionlegitimacystate capacitybureaucratic quality
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , 08 February 2012 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åberg, R. (1989), ‘Distributive mechanisms of the welfare state – a formal analysis and an empirical application’, European Sociological Review 5(2): 188–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D.Robinson, J. (2008), The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development, Washington, DC: The World Bank (On behalf of the Commission on Growth and Development).Google Scholar
Adésínà, ′J.O. (2007), Social Policy in Sub-Saharan African Context: In Search of Inclusive Development, Social Policy in a Development Context, Basingstoke England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alber, J. (1984), ‘Government responses to challenges of unemployment’, in P. Flora (ed.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 151–184.Google Scholar
Alber, J. (2006), ‘Das “europäische Sozialmodell” und die USA’, Leviathan – Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft 34(2): 207–240.Google Scholar
Allan, J.P.Scruggs, L. (2004), ‘Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies’, American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, K., Gerber, M., Leimgruber, P., Beyler, M. (2008), Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2006: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Retrieved 18 June 2008 from http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.htmlGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. (1992), ‘Economic theory and the welfare state: a survey and interpretation’, Journal of Economic Literature 30: 741–803.Google Scholar
Beck, N.Katz, J. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-country datasets’, American Political Science Review 89(3): 632–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boadway, R.Keen, M. (2000), ‘Redistribution’, in A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds), Handbook of Income Distribution, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 677–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, F.J. (2008), ‘GRINTER: a Stata utility to graph interaction effects after regression models (Version 1.8)’.Google Scholar
Brautigam, D., Fjeldstad, O.-H.Moore, M. (2008), Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries: Capacity and Consent, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, M.E.Mares, I. (2007), ‘The welfare state in global perspective’, in C. Boix and S. Stokes (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinesen, P.T. (2011), When in Rome, do as the Romans do. An analysis of the acculturation of generalized trust of non-Western immigrants in Western Europe, PhD thesis. Aarhus: Department of Political Science, Aarhus University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T.Soskice, D. (2001), ‘Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state’, in P.A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallend, F. (1997), ‘The crisis of the Proporz governments: current political debates about the Constitutional system of government in the Austrian provinces’, Österreichische Zeitschrift Fur Politikwissenschaft 26(1): 23–40.Google Scholar
Forbarth, W.E. (1989), Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frisk Jensen, M. (2008), Korruption og embedsetik: Danske embedsmænds korruption i perioden 1800 til 1886, PhD thesis. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Gilley, B. (2006), ‘The determinants of state legitimacy: results for 72 countries’, International Political Science Review 27(1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (2003), ‘Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative politics’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harling, P. (1996), The Waning of ‘Old Corruption’. The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain 1779–1846, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattam, V.C. (1993), Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States, Princeton Studies in American Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckscher, G. (1952), Svensk statsförvaltning i arbete, Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Heinisch, R. (2002), Populism, Proporz, Parian: Austria Turns to the Right, New York: Nova Scotia Publishers.Google Scholar
Heston, A., Summers, R., Aten, B. (2002), Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, October 2002.Google Scholar
Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B.Nasiritousi, N. (2009), ‘Quality of government: what you get’, Annual Review of Political Science 13: 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E.Stephens, J.D. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J.D., Brady, D., Beckfield, J. (2004), ‘Comparative welfare state data set’. Northwestern University, University of North Carolina, Duke University and Indiana University.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2008), World Economic Outlook Database, October 2008. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. (2005), Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T.Soskice, D. (2006), ‘Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others’, American Political Science Review 100(2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T.Stephens, J.D. (2008), ‘Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation’, Comparative Political Studies 41(4–5): 600–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, L.Pontusson, J. (2005), ‘Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent Countries’, Perspectives on Politics 3(3): 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S.Keefer, P. (1995), ‘Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures’, Economics and Politics 7(3): 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, J., Rothstein, B.Rose-Ackerman, S. (2004), Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2001), ‘Contentious institutions – an augmented rational-action analysis of the origins and path dependency of welfare state institutions in Western countries’, Rationality and Society 13(2): 235–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (2006), ‘Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism – protagonists, consenters, and antagonists’, World Politics 58(2): 167–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W.Palme, J. (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review 63(5): 661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W.Palme, J. (2003), ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review 97(3): 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, S. (2004), The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C.A. (2006), The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support, Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Levi, M. (1998), Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2003), The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2005), ‘Social protection around the world – external insecurity, state capacity, and domestic political cleavages’, Comparative Political Studies 38(6): 623–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moene, K.-O.Wallerstein, M. (2001), ‘Targeting and political support for welfare spending’, Economics of Governance 2(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moene, K.-O.Wallerstein, M. (2003), ‘Earnings inequality and welfare spending: a disaggregated analysis’, World Politics 55(4): 485–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P.Inglehart, R. (2004), Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide, Cambridge Studies in Social Theory, Religion, and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2006), ‘Population and labour force statistics. release 02’. Retrieved 19 October 2007 from http://www.oecd.org/std/labourGoogle Scholar
OECD (2007), ‘Main economic indicators’. Retrieved 19 October 2007 from http://www.oecd.org/std/meiGoogle Scholar
Pasotti, E. (2010), Political Branding in Cities, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paster, T. (2009), Choosing Lesser Evils: The Role of Business in the Development of the German Welfare State from the 1880s to the 1990s, PhD thesis. San Domenico di Fiesole, Florence: Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Pontusson, J. (2005), Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. (1997), ‘The correlates of change in international financial regulation’, American Political Science Review 91(3): 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesco, M.Draibe, S.M. (eds) (2007), Latin America: A New Developmental Welfare State Model in the Making?, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rother, L. (1999), ‘Where taxes aren't so certain’. New York Times, 21 March 1999: 3.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1991), ‘State structures and variations in corporatism: the Swedish case’, Scandinavian Political Studies 14(3): 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. (2007), ‘Anti-Corruption: A “Big-Bang” Theory’. Working Paper no. 3, The Quality of Government Institute at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B.Teorell, J. (2008), ‘What is Quality of Government: a theory of impartial political institutions’, Governance – An International Journal of Policy and Administration 21(2): 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B.Uslaner, E.M. (2005), ‘All for all. Equality, corruption and social trust’, World Politics 58(3): 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, W.D. (1987), Elites and the Wealthy in Modern British History, Sussex: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Rudra, N. (2004), ‘Openness, welfare spending, and inequality in the developing world’, International Studies Quarterly 48(3): 683–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanni, M., Teorell, J., Kumlin, S., Rothstein, B. (2008), The QoG Social Policy Data Set, version 4Nov08. Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Samson, M.J. (2002), ‘The social, economic and fiscal impact of comprehensive social security reform for South Africa’, Social Dynamics – A Journal of the Centre for African Studies University of Cape Town 28(2): 69–97.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2002), ‘Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies 35(2): 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2009), ‘Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back in yet again’, World Politics 61(3): 516–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, J.T. (1998), ‘Trust, taxes and compliance’, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds), Trust & Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 135–196.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2002), ‘The Ghent system and union membership in Europe, 1970–1996’, Political Research Quarterly 55(2): 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2006), ‘Welfare state entitlements data set: a comparative institutional analysis of eighteen welfare states, version 1.2’. Retrieved 19 June 2007 from http://sp.uconn.edu/~scruggs/wp.htmGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2007), ‘Welfare state generosity across space and time’, in J. Clasen and N.A. Seigel (eds), Investigating Welfare State Change, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 133–165.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L.Allan, J. (2006), ‘Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: a replication and revision’, Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, M.A. (2002), ‘The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries’, Journal of Politics 64(2): 408–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1987), ‘America's incomplete welfare state. The limits of new deal reforms and the origins of the present crisis’, in M. Rein (ed.), Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992), Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeeding, T. (2004), ‘Twenty years of research on income inequality, poverty and redistribution in the developed world: introduction and overview’, Socio-Economic Review 2(2): 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorj, B.Martuccelli, D. (2008), The Latin America Challenge: Social Cohesion and Democracy, Buenos Aires: The Edelstein Center for Social Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, J.Schram, S.F. (2007), ‘A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback’, American Political Science Review 101(1): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (ed.) (2007), The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations, Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2002), Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, P. (2002), Capitalists Against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T.R. (1998), ‘Trust and democratic governance’, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds), Trust & Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 269–294.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E.M. (2008), Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law: The Bulging Pocket Makes the Easy Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, M.Skocpol, T. (1985), ‘State structures and the possibilities for “Keynesian” responses to the great depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States’, in P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, E. (2005), Montgelas – Der Architekt des modernen bayerischen Staates 1799–1838, München: Beck Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, B. (2001), ‘Bayesian thinking about Macrosociology’, American Journal of Sociology 107(2): 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. (1996), ‘Obstacles to social reform in Brazil's new democracy’, Comparative Politics 29(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2007), ‘HNPStats: health, population and nutrition data’. Retrieved 4 October 2007 from http://go.worldbank.org/N2N84RDV00Google Scholar
Young, H.P. (1998), Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuberi, D. (2006), Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univeristy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar